Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Determining fast-S and slow-S propagation directions with SV-P data produced by buried explosives and recorded with vertical geophones

Journal Article · · Interpretation
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [4]
  1. Consultant, Maumee, Ohio 43537, USA.(corresponding author).; OSTI
  2. Texseis, Houston, Texas 77055, USA..
  3. Battelle, Columbus, Ohio 43201, USA..
  4. CORE Energy, Traverse City, Michigan 49684, USA..

We have evaluated the concept of practicing S-wave reflection seismology with legacy 3D seismic data generated by a P-wave source and recorded with only vertical geophones. This type of S-wave imaging is based on the principle that seismic P-wave sources not only produce a downgoing illuminating P wavefield, but they also simultaneously produce a downgoing illuminating SV wavefield that, in almost all cases, is suitable for S-wave reflection imaging. The S-mode used in this study is the SV-P, or converted-P, mode. This mode involves a downgoing illuminating SV wavefield and an upgoing reflected P-mode that is recorded by vertical geophones. In flat-layered stratigraphy, the lengths of the SV and P raypaths in SV-P imaging are identical to the lengths of the SV and P raypaths in P-SV imaging with P-sources and 3C geophones. P-SV imaging of deep rocks has been practiced for more than two decades; SV-P imaging is a new concept. SV-P data should provide the same options for investigating deep rocks as do P-SV data. We have determined one of the equivalences between SV-P data extracted from vertical-geophone data and P-SV data extracted from horizontal geophones: that both modes react to azimuth-dependent variations in the S velocity in anisotropic rocks. Azimuthal variations in the SV-P traveltime can be used to define the polarization direction of the fast-S-wave mode, which is also the azimuth of the maximum horizontal stress (SHmax). Our investigation demonstrates a noninvasive method for monitoring changes in the SHmax azimuth across a CO2storage reservoir, or any targeted porous rock, as fluids are cycled into, and then out of, that rock’s pore space.

Research Organization:
Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
DOE Contract Number:
FE0031686
OSTI ID:
1849296
Journal Information:
Interpretation, Journal Name: Interpretation Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 9; ISSN 2324-8858
Publisher:
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (20)

Gas reservoir characterization using SV-P converted wave mode, a case study from western China conference August 2017
S-S imaging with vertical-force sources journal May 2014
Generating direct-S modes with simple, low-cost, widely available seismic sources journal May 2014
Pp + ps = ss journal November 2002
Using finite-difference modeling to understand direct-SV illumination produced by P sources conference August 2017
Land based S-wave reflection seismology with P sources — does it work? conference August 2017
Real-data comparisons of direct-S modes produced by “P” sources and “gold standard” S sources conference August 2017
Examples of SV-P images made with P sources and vertical geophones conference August 2017
Practicing S-wave reflection seismology with “P-wave” sources: Concepts, principles, and overview conference August 2017
Direct-SV radiation produced by land-based P-sources — Part 1: Surface sources journal August 2018
The winds of change: Anisotropic rocks—their preferred direction of fluid flow and their associated seismic signatures—Part 1 journal November 2004
“SV-P imaging compared to P-SV imaging: Analysis of statics and velocities required to create an SV-P image” conference August 2017
SV-P: An ignored seismic mode that has great value for interpreters journal May 2014
The winds of change: Anisotropic rocks—their preferred direction of fluid flow and their associated seismic signatures—Part 2 journal December 2004
Cracking the fractures—seismic anisotropy in an offshore reservoir journal January 2001
Direct-SV radiation produced by land-based P-sources — Part 2: Buried explosives journal August 2018
AVO and interpretive processing of Sv-P reflections coexisting with P-P reflections on P-wave legacy data conference August 2017
Improved reservoir delineation by using SV-P seismic data in Wellington field, Kansas conference August 2017
Delineation of fracture anisotropy signatures in Wudayhi Field by azimuthal seismic data journal December 2003
SV-P extraction and imaging for far-offset vertical seismic profile data journal August 2015

Similar Records

Estimating SHmax azimuth with P sources and vertical geophones: Use P-P reflection amplitudes or use SV-P reflection times?
Journal Article · Mon Feb 21 23:00:00 EST 2022 · Interpretation · OSTI ID:1980961

Stress analysis using direct-S wavelets produced by a vertical vibrator
Journal Article · Sun Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · Interpretation · OSTI ID:1849295

INTEGRATING P-WAVE AND S-WAVE SEISMIC DATA TO IMPROVE CHARACTERIZATION OF OIL RESERVOIRS
Technical Report · Tue Nov 30 23:00:00 EST 2004 · OSTI ID:838712