skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Food security under high bioenergy demand toward long-term climate goals

Journal Article · · Climatic Change
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7]
  1. Ritsumeikan Univ., Kusatsu (Japan); National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba (Japan). Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research
  2. US Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Kansas City, MO (United States). Economic Research Service Beacon Facility
  3. CIRAD, UMR CIRED, Nogent-sur-Marne (France)
  4. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), College Park, MD (United States)
  5. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg (Austria
  6. National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES), Tsukuba (Japan). Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research; Kyoto Univ. (Japan); International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg (Austria)
  7. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Potsdam (Germany)

Bioenergy is expected to play an important role in the achievement of stringent climate-change mitigation targets requiring the application of negative emissions technology. Using a multi-model framework, we assess the effects of high bioenergy demand on global food production, food security, and competition for agricultural land. Various scenarios simulate global bioenergy demands of 100, 200, 300, and 400 exajoules (EJ) by 2100, with and without a carbon price. Six global energy-economy-agriculture models contribute to this study, with different methodologies and technologies used for bioenergy supply and greenhouse-gas mitigation options for agriculture. We find that the large-scale use of bioenergy, if not implemented properly, would raise food prices and increase the number of people at risk of hunger in many areas of the world. For example, an increase in global bioenergy demand from 200 to 300 EJ causes a -11% to +40% change in food crop prices and decreases food consumption from -45 to -2 kcal person-1 day-1, leading to an additional 0 to 25 million people at risk of hunger compared with the case of no bioenergy demand (90th percentile range across models). This risk does not rule out the intensive use of bioenergy but shows the importance of its careful implementation, potentially including regulations that protect cropland for food production or for the use of bioenergy feedstock on land that is not competitive with food production.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE; JSPS KAKENHI; Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency of Japan
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830; JPMEERF20202002; 19 K24387
OSTI ID:
1837666
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-134663
Journal Information:
Climatic Change, Vol. 163, Issue 3; ISSN 0165-0009
Publisher:
SpringerCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (29)

The Nexus Land-Use model version 1.0, an approach articulating biophysical potentials and economic dynamics to model competition for land-use journal January 2012
Implications of alternative metrics for global mitigation costs and greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture journal October 2012
Estimating the Degree of Market Integration journal February 2008
Land-use protection for climate change mitigation journal November 2014
Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture without compromising food security? journal October 2017
Understanding the contribution of non-carbon dioxide gases in deep mitigation scenarios journal July 2015
Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields journal March 2015
Climate change effects on agriculture: Economic responses to biophysical shocks journal December 2013
Consequence of Climate Mitigation on the Risk of Hunger journal June 2015
Scenarios for the risk of hunger in the twenty-first century using Shared Socioeconomic Pathways journal January 2015
Land use representation in a global CGE model for long-term simulation: CET vs. logit functions journal September 2014
Reducing emissions from agriculture to meet the 2 °C target journal July 2016
SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways journal January 2017
The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century journal January 2017
Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways journal January 2017
Diagnostic indicators for integrated assessment models of climate policy journal January 2015
A multi-model assessment of food security implications of climate change mitigation journal May 2019
Economic and Physical Modeling of land use in gcam 3.0 and an Application to Agricultural Productivity, Land, and Terrestrial Carbon journal May 2014
Ethanol Expansion in the Food versus Fuel Debate: How Will Developing Countries Fare? journal January 2007
Climate change mitigation through livestock system transitions journal February 2014
Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution journal May 2014
Global land-use allocation model linked to an integrated assessment model journal February 2017
Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways journal January 2017
Impacts of increased bioenergy demand on global food markets: an AgMIP economic model intercomparison journal December 2013
Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management journal December 2013
Policy Options for Integrated Energy and Agricultural Markets * journal September 2008
Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy journal July 2018
Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparison journal July 2018
Land-use transition for bioenergy and climate stabilization: model comparison of drivers, impacts and interactions with other land use based mitigation options journal September 2013

Similar Records

Impacts of increased bioenergy demand on global food markets: an AgMIP economic model intercomparison
Journal Article · Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2014 · Agricultural Economics, 45(1):103-116 · OSTI ID:1837666

Reconciling food security and bioenergy: priorities for action
Journal Article · Tue Jun 14 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy · OSTI ID:1837666

Evaluating the regional risks to food availability and access from land-based climate policies in an Integrated Assessment Model
Journal Article · Sun May 22 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · Environment Systems and Decisions · OSTI ID:1837666