Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

S-factor and scattering-parameter extractions from $${}^{3}\mathrm{He}+{}^{4}\mathrm{He}{ \rightarrow }^{7}\mathrm{Be}+\gamma $$

Journal Article · · Journal of Physics. G, Nuclear and Particle Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States); Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States); San Diego State University
  2. San Diego State Univ., CA (United States)
  3. Ohio Univ., Athens, OH (United States); Technische Univ. Darmstadt (Germany); GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt (Germany)

Previous studies of the reaction $${}^{3}\mathrm{He}+{}^{4}\mathrm{He}\to {}^{7}\mathrm{Be}+\gamma $$ have mainly focused on providing the best central value and error bar for the S factor at solar energies. Experimental measurements of this capture reaction at higher energies, the $${}^{3}\mathrm{He}$$–$${}^{4}\mathrm{He}$$ scattering phase shifts, as well as properties of $${}^{7}\mathrm{Be}$$ and its excited state, have been used to constrain the theoretical models employed for this purpose. Here we show that much more information than was previously appreciated can be extracted from angle-integrated capture data alone. We use the next-to-leading-order (NLO) amplitude in an effective field theory (EFT) for $${}^{3}\mathrm{He}+{}^{4}\mathrm{He}\to {}^{7}\mathrm{Be}+\gamma $$ to perform the extrapolation. At this order the EFT describes the capture process using an s-wave scattering length and effective range, the asymptotic properties of $${}^{7}\mathrm{Be}$$ and its excited state, and short-distance contributions to the E1 capture amplitude. We extract the multi-dimensional posterior of all these parameters via a Bayesian analysis that uses capture data below 2 MeV. We find that properties of the $${}^{7}\mathrm{Be}$$ ground and excited states are well constrained. The total S factor $$S(0)\,={0.577}_{-0.016}^{+0.015}$$ keV b, while the branching ratio for excited- to ground-state capture at zero energy, $${Br}(0)={0.406}_{-0.011}^{+0.013}$$, both at 68% degree of belief. This S(0) is broadly consistent with other recent evaluations, and agrees with the previously recommended value $$S(0)=0.56\pm 0.03\,\,\mathrm{keV}$$ b, but has a smaller error bar. We also find significant constraints on $${}^{3}\mathrm{He}$$–$${}^{4}\mathrm{He}$$ scattering parameters, and we obtain constraints on the angular distribution of capture gamma rays, which is important for interpreting experiments. The path forward for this reaction seems to lie with better measurements of the scattering phase shifts and S(E)'s angular dependence away from zero energy, together with better understanding of the asymptotic normalization coefficients of the $${}^{7}$$Be bound states' wave functions. Lastly, data on these could further reduce the uncertainty on S(0).

Research Organization:
San Diego State Univ. Foundation, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP); National Nuclear Security Agency; NSF
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0019257; FG02-93ER40756; FG02-97ER41014; NA0003883
OSTI ID:
1769271
Journal Information:
Journal of Physics. G, Nuclear and Particle Physics, Journal Name: Journal of Physics. G, Nuclear and Particle Physics Journal Issue: 5 Vol. 47; ISSN 0954-3899
Publisher:
IOP PublishingCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (72)

Absolute cross section of the3He(?,?)7Be reaction journal June 1988
The3He(?,?)7Be reaction and the solar neutrino problem journal December 1982
A new algorithm for adaptive multidimensional integration journal May 1978
γ rays from an extranuclear direct capture process journal January 1961
The 3He(α, γ)7Be reaction at very low energy journal April 1969
Proton capture by 7Be journal May 1970
Measurement of the absolute cross section of the 3He(4He, γ)7Be reaction at Ec.m. = 525 keV journal October 1984
Low-energy behavior of the 3He(α, γ)7Be cross section journal April 1984
Coulomb corrections in non-relativistic scattering journal January 1973
Antisymmetrization effects in radiative capture reactions journal November 1985
A new expansion for nucleon-nucleon interactions journal April 1998
Improving the convergence of NN effective field theory journal February 2000
Energy levels of light nuclei A=5, 6, 7 journal September 2002
Effective field theory for halo nuclei: shallow -wave states journal December 2002
Effective field theory of short-range forces journal January 1999
Coulomb effects in low energy proton–proton scattering journal February 2000
Two-nucleon systems from effective field theory journal November 1998
Compilation and R-matrix analysis of Big Bang nuclear reaction rates journal September 2004
Bayesian methods for parameter estimation in effective field theories journal March 2009
Scattering length and effective range for collisions between light ions within a microscopic model journal July 2007
αα scattering in halo effective field theory journal September 2008
The S-factor at solar energies: The prompt γ experiment at LUNA journal December 2008
Electric properties of the Beryllium-11 system in Halo EFT journal August 2011
Activation measurement of the reaction cross section at high energies journal June 2013
Narrow resonances in effective field theory journal September 2003
Halo effective field theory constrains the solar 7Be + p → 8B + γ rate journal December 2015
He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 and H 3 ( α , γ ) Li 7 astrophysical S factors from the no-core shell model with continuum journal June 2016
Universal physics of bound states of a few charged particles journal November 2019
Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives journal January 2005
How well do we understand 7 Be + p8 B + γ ? An Effective Field Theory perspective journal January 2016
Radiative alpha-capture rates leading to A - 7 nuclei - Applications to the solar neutrino problem and Big Bang nucleosynthesis journal August 1987
Experimental, computational, and observational analysis of primordial nucleosynthesis journal March 1993
Cluster model of A=7 nuclei and the astrophysical S factor for 3 He(α,γ) 7 Be at zero energy journal January 1985
Cluster model of A=7 nuclei revisited, and the astrophysical S factors for 3 He(α,γ) 7 Be and 3 H(α,γ) 7 Li at zero energy journal October 1988
Effective field theory description of halo nuclei journal September 2017
Nuclear reaction network for primordial nucleosynthesis: a detailed analysis of rates, uncertainties and light nuclei yields journal December 2004
He 3 ( α ,   γ ) Be 7 Reaction journal September 1963
Direct-Capture Model for the He 3 ( α ,   γ ) Be 7 and T ( α ,   γ ) Li 7 Reactions journal September 1963
On the Interpretation of Neutron-Proton Scattering Data by the Schwinger Variational Method journal July 1949
Theory of the Effective Range in Nuclear Scattering journal July 1949
On the Interpretation of Resonance Levels and Their Widths in Terms of the Scattering Length and the Effective Range journal July 1951
Low-energy bound states, resonances, and scattering of light ions journal November 2019
Direct capture cross sections at low energy journal June 1981
Radiative capture reaction He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 at low energies journal January 1981
Electromagnetic and weak transitions in the seven-nucleon systems journal July 1983
Zero-energy determination of the astrophysical S factor and effective-range expansions journal January 2000
Radiative α -capture cross sections from realistic nucleon-nucleon interactions and variational Monte Carlo wave functions journal April 2001
He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 cross section at low energies journal March 2007
Astrophysical S factor of the He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 reaction measured at low energy via detection of prompt and delayed γ rays journal June 2007
He 3 + He 4 → Be 7 astrophysical S factor journal November 2007
AZURE: An R -matrix code for nuclear astrophysics journal April 2010
Astrophysical S factor of 3 He ( α , γ ) 7 Be journal June 2013
Publisher's Note: Astrophysical S factor of 3 He ( α , γ ) 7 Be [Phys. Rev. C 87 , 065804 (2013)] journal July 2013
Effective field theory for proton halo nuclei journal January 2014
Combining ab initio calculations and low-energy effective field theory for halo nuclear systems: The case of Be 7 + p → B 8 + γ journal May 2014
Monte Carlo uncertainty of the He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 reaction rate journal September 2014
Models, measurements, and effective field theory: Proton capture on Be 7 at next-to-leading order journal September 2018
Estimating reaction rates and uncertainties for primordial nucleosynthesis journal May 2000
Constraining big bang lithium production with recent solar neutrino data journal June 2015
Stellar and Primordial Nucleosynthesis of Be 7 : Measurement of He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 journal June 2009
Erratum: Stellar and Primordial Nucleosynthesis of Be 7 : Measurement of He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 , 232502 (2009)] journal October 2009
Microscopic Calculation of the He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 and H 3 ( α , γ ) Li 7 Capture Cross Sections Using Realistic Interactions journal January 2011
Model-Independent Calculation of Radiative Neutron Capture on Lithium-7 journal May 2011
New Precision Measurement of the H e 3 ( H e 4 , γ )   B e 7 Cross Section journal December 2004
Activation Measurement of the He 3 ( α , γ ) Be 7 Cross Section at Low Energy journal September 2006
Solar fusion cross sections journal October 1998
Solar fusion cross sections. II. The p p chain and CNO cycles journal April 2011
Universal properties and structure of halo nuclei journal August 2008
Radiative 3He( $\alpha , \gamma$ α , γ )7Be reaction in halo effective field theory journal May 2018
Solar Neutrinos: Status and Prospects journal August 2013
The Weighted Likelihood Ratio, Linear Hypotheses on Normal Location Parameters journal February 1971
Bayesian Estimation of Thermonuclear Reaction Rates journal October 2016