skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Influence of partial charge on the material removal rate during chemical polishing

Journal Article · · Journal of the American Ceramic Society
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.15995· OSTI ID:1755833

A partial charge-based chemical polishing model has been developed, which can serve as metric for describing the relative polishing material removal rate for different combinations of slurries and workpieces. A series of controlled polishing experiments utilizing a variety of colloidal polishing slurries (SiO2, CeO2, ZrO2, MgO, Sb2O5) and optical materials [single crystals of Al2O3 (sapphire), SiC, Y3Al5O12 (YAG), CaF2, and LiB3O5 (LBO); a SiO2-Al2O3-P2O5-Li2O glass ceramic (Zerodur); and glasses of SiO2:TiO2 (ULE), SiO2 (fused silica), and P2O5-Al2O3-K2O-BaO (Phosphate)] was performed and its material removal rate was measured. As previously proposed by Cook (J Non-Cryst Solids. 1990;120:152), for many polishing systems, the removal rate is governed by a series of chemical reactions which include the formation of a surface hydroxide, followed by condensation of that hydroxyl moiety with the polishing particle, and a subsequent hydrolysis reaction. The rate of condensation can often be the rate limiting step, thus it can determine the polishing material removal rate. By largely keeping the numerous other factors that influence material removal rate fixed (such as due to particle size distributions, interface interactions, pad topography, kinematics, and applied pressure), the material removal rate is shown to scale exponentially with the partial charge difference (δwp-s) between the workpiece and polishing slurry particle for many of the slurry-workpiece combinations indicating that condensation rate is the rate limiting step. The partial charge (δ) describes the equilibrium distribution of electron density between chemically bonded atoms and is related to the electronegativity of the atoms chemically bonded to one another. This partial charge model also explains the age-old experimental finding of why cerium oxide is the most effective polishing slurry for chemical removal of many workpieces. Finally, some of the slurry-workpiece combinations that did not follow the partial charge dependence offer insight to other removal mechanisms or rate limiting reaction pathways.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344
OSTI ID:
1755833
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1468661
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-746065; 900931
Journal Information:
Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol. 102, Issue 4; ISSN 0002-7820
Publisher:
American Ceramic SocietyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 9 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (25)

Adsorption of silica colloids onto like-charged silica surfaces of different roughness journal May 2017
The structure of abraded glass surfaces journal February 1922
Chemical processes in glass polishing journal April 1990
Surface Chemical Processes in Chemical Mechanical Polishing journal January 2002
Effect of rogue particles on the sub-surface damage of fused silica during grinding/polishing journal April 2008
A model for lapping of glass journal January 1993
Feature-Scale Fluid-Based Erosion Modeling for Chemical-Mechanical Polishing journal January 1994
Effects of abrasive size distribution in chemical mechanical planarization: Modeling and verification journal August 2003
Microscopic Removal Function and the Relationship Between Slurry Particle Size Distribution and Workpiece Roughness During Pad Polishing journal November 2013
A fundamental model proposed for material removal in chemical–mechanical polishing journal February 2010
Chemical-Mechanical Polishing for Fabricating Patterned W Metal Features as Chip Interconnects journal January 1991
Mechanism and Simulation of Removal Rate and Surface Roughness During Optical Polishing of Glasses journal March 2016
Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: theory and modeling journal May 2001
The Basic Mechanism of Glass Polishing journal January 2000
Nanoscratching of Optical Glass Surfaces Near the Elastic–Plastic Load Boundary to Mimic the Mechanics of Polishing Particles journal January 2016
Simultaneous Temperature Measurement of Wafers in Chemical Mechanical Polishing of Silicon Dioxide Layer journal December 1995
Thermodynamic evaluation of a partial charge model assumptionfor the dissolved silica system journal February 2007
Materials Science and Technology of Optical Fabrication book January 2018
Mechanism of polishing of SiO2 films by CeO2 particles journal May 2001
A chemical mechanical polishing model based on the viscous flow of the amorphous layer journal September 2008
Relationship between surface μ‐roughness and interface slurry particle spatial distribution during glass polishing journal April 2017
Kinematic Analysis and Measurement of Temperature Rise on a Pad in Chemical Mechanical Planarization journal January 1999
Convergent Pad Polishing of Amorphous Silica journal February 2012
Sol-gel chemistry of transition metal oxides journal January 1988
Effect of Rogue Particles on the Sub-Surface Damage of Fused Silica during Grinding/Polishing conference January 2006

Similar Records

Nanoplastic removal function and the mechanical nature of colloidal silica slurry polishing
Journal Article · Thu Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2018 · Journal of the American Ceramic Society · OSTI ID:1755833

Towards predicting removal rate and surface roughness during grinding of optical materials
Journal Article · Wed Mar 27 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Applied Optics · OSTI ID:1755833

Subsurface mechanical damage correlations after grinding of various optical materials
Journal Article · Thu Apr 25 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · Optical Engineering · OSTI ID:1755833