skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparing surface and stratospheric impacts of geoengineering with different SO2 injection strategies

Journal Article · · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030329· OSTI ID:1633530
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [2];  [5];  [6];  [6];  [6];  [7];  [5]
  1. BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)
  2. Cornell University
  3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, PO Box 3000-80307,
  4. University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
  5. NCAR
  6. National Center for Atmospheric Research
  7. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
+ Show Author Affiliations

Geoengineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosols can, to some extent, be designed to achieve different climate objectives. Here we use the the state-of-the-art Community Earth System Model, version 1, with the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model as its atmospheric component (CESM1(WACCM)), to compare surface climate and stratospheric effects of two geoengineering strategies. In one, SO2 is injected into the tropical lower stratosphere at the equator to keep global mean temperature nearly constant under an RCP8.5 scenario, as has been commonly simulated in previous studies. In another, the Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS), SO2 is injected into the lower stratosphere at four different locations (30°N/S and 15°N/S) to keep global mean temperature, the interhemispheric temperature gradient, and the equator-to-pole temperature gradient nearly unchanged. Both simulations are effective at offsetting changes in global mean temperature and the interhemispheric temperature gradient that result from increased greenhouse gases, but only GLENS offsets changes in the equator-to-pole temperature gradient. GLENS results in a more even aerosol distribution, whereas equatorial injection tends to result in an aerosol peak in the tropics. Many other aspects of surface climate changes, including precipitation and sea ice coverage, also show reduced changes in GLENS as compared to equatorial injection. Stratospheric changes, including heating, circulation, and effects on the quasi-biennial oscillation are greatly reduced in GLENS as compared to equatorial injection.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1633530
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-141301
Journal Information:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 14
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (54)

Modifications of the quasi-biennial oscillation by a geoengineering perturbation of the stratospheric aerosol layer: Aquila et al.: QBO modifications by geoengineering journal March 2014
Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle journal May 2008
Geoengineering as an optimization problem journal July 2010
The Science of Geoengineering journal May 2013
Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? journal July 2006
Tailoring Meridional and Seasonal Radiative Forcing by Sulfate Aerosol Solar Geoengineering journal January 2018
The CCSM4 Ocean Component journal March 2012
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) simulations of climate following volcanic eruptions: VOLCANIC IMPACTS IN THE CMIP5 MODELS journal September 2012
Microphysical simulations of sulfur burdens from stratospheric sulfur geoengineering journal January 2012
Extratropical Influence on ITCZ Shifts in Slab Ocean Simulations of Global Warming journal January 2012
Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO 2 -induced climate change journal July 2000
The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone journal October 2009
Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models journal September 2003
Increasing atmospheric poleward energy transport with global warming: INCREASING FLUXES journal December 2010
An overview of the Earth system science of solar geoengineering: Overview of the earth system science of solar geoengineering journal July 2016
Sensitivity of the radiative forcing by stratospheric sulfur geoengineering to the amount and strategy of the SO 2 injection studied with the LMDZ-S3A model journal January 2018
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GEOMIP MODEL RESPONSE journal August 2013
Explicit feedback and the management of uncertainty in meeting climate objectives with solar geoengineering journal April 2014
First Simulations of Designing Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering to Meet Multiple Simultaneous Climate Objectives journal December 2017
Geoengineering as a design problem journal January 2016
Climate effects of high-latitude volcanic eruptions: Role of the time of year journal January 2011
Sulfuric acid deposition from stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate aerosols journal January 2009
Toward a minimal representation of aerosols in climate models: description and evaluation in the Community Atmosphere Model CAM5 journal January 2012
The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations journal December 2017
Mission-driven research for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering journal January 2019
The Engineering of Climate Engineering journal May 2019
Dynamics of the coupled human–climate system resulting from closed-loop control of solar geoengineering journal June 2013
Geoengineering with stratospheric aerosols: What do we not know after a decade of research?: GEOENGINEERING: WHAT DO WE NOT KNOW? journal November 2016
Timescale for Detecting the Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering journal February 2019
The Effects of Doubling the CO 2 Concentration on the climate of a General Circulation Model journal January 1975
Radiative and Chemical Response to Interactive Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols in Fully Coupled CESM1(WACCM) journal December 2017
Changing transport processes in the stratosphere by radiative heating of sulfate aerosols journal January 2017
Sulfur injections for a cooler planet journal July 2017
What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO 2 ? journal January 2015
Understanding the Changes of Stratospheric Water Vapor in Coupled Chemistry–Climate Model Simulations journal October 2008
Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft: AEROSOL FROM CONDENSIBLE VAPOR journal September 2010
Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GeoMIP ozone response journal March 2014
Stratospheric Transport journal January 2002
An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols
  • Rasch, Philip J.; Tilmes, Simone; Turco, Richard P.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 366, Issue 1882 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0131
journal August 2008
Stratospheric Response in the First Geoengineering Simulation Meeting Multiple Surface Climate Objectives journal June 2018
Stratospheric Dynamical Response and Ozone Feedbacks in the Presence of SO 2 Injections journal December 2017
Volcanic eruptions and climate journal May 2000
Winter warming from large volcanic eruptions journal December 1992
Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO 2 injections journal January 2008
Impact of geoengineered aerosols on the troposphere and stratosphere journal January 2009
CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble Project journal November 2018
The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes journal May 2008
Effects of Different Stratospheric SO 2 Injection Altitudes on Stratospheric Chemistry and Dynamics journal May 2018
Sensitivity of Aerosol Distribution and Climate Response to Stratospheric SO 2 Injection Locations journal December 2017
The representative concentration pathways: an overview journal August 2011
Exploring accumulation-mode H 2 SO 4 versus SO 2 stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model journal January 2019
Sulfur deposition changes under sulfate geoengineering conditions: quasi-biennial oscillation effects on the transport and lifetime of stratospheric aerosols journal January 2018
Revisiting the observed surface climate response to large volcanic eruptions journal January 2017
The Total Meridional Heat Flux and Its Oceanic and Atmospheric Partition journal November 2005

Similar Records

Soil moisture and other hydrological changes in a stratospheric aerosol geoengineering large ensemble
Journal Article · Mon Dec 16 00:00:00 EST 2019 · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · OSTI ID:1633530
+5 more
The Climate Response to Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Can Be Tailored Using Multiple Injection Locations
Journal Article · Thu Dec 07 00:00:00 EST 2017 · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · OSTI ID:1633530
+5 more
Changes in Hadley circulation and intertropical convergence zone under strategic stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
Journal Article · Tue Apr 19 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science · OSTI ID:1633530
+11 more

Related Subjects