Health co-benefits and mitigation costs as per the Paris Agreement under different technological pathways for energy supply

Journal Article · Wed Jan 29 00:00:00 EST 2020 · Environment International

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105513· OSTI ID:1599855

Sampedro Martinez de Estivariz, Jon ^[1]; Smith, Steven J. ^[2]; Arto, Iñaki ^[3]; Gonzalez-Eguino, Mikel ^[3]; Markandya, Anil ^[3]; Mulvaney, Kathleen M. ^[4]; Pizarro-Irizar, Cristina ^[3]; van Dingenen, Rita ^[5]

---

1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), College Park, MD (United States). Joint Global Change Research Inst.; Univ. of the Basque Country, Donostia (Spain)
2. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), College Park, MD (United States). Joint Global Change Research Inst.
3. Univ. of the Basque Country, Donostia (Spain)
4. Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (United States)
5. European Commission, Ispra (Italy). Joint Research Centre

This study assesses the reductions in air pollution emissions and subsequent beneficial health effects from different global mitigation pathways consistent with the 2 °C stabilization objective of the Paris Agreement. We use an integrated modelling framework, demonstrating the need for models with an appropriate level of technology detail for an accurate co-benefit assessment. The framework combines an integrated assessment model (GCAM) with an air quality model (TM5-FASST) to obtain estimates of premature mortality and then assesses their economic cost. The results show that significant co-benefits can be found for a range of technological options, such as introducing a limitation on bioenergy, carbon capture and storage (CCS) or nuclear power. Cumulative premature mortality may be reduced by 17–23% by 2020–2050 compared to the baseline, depending on the scenarios. However, the ratio of health co-benefits to mitigation costs varies substantially, ranging from 1.45 when a bioenergy limitation is set to 2.19 when all technologies are available. As for regional disaggregation, some regions, such as India and China, obtain far greater co-benefits than others.

• Research Organization: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE
• Grant/Contract Number: AC05-76RL01830
• OSTI ID: 1599855
• Report Number(s): PNNL-ACT-SA--10474
• Journal Information: Environment International, Journal Name: Environment International Journal Issue: C Vol. 136; ISSN 0160-4120
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Air pollution
Co-benefits
Deep decarbonization
Health
Integrated assessment