Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Comparison of Experimental Methods for Estimating Matrix Diffusion Coefficients for Contaminant Transport Modeling

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/1407916· OSTI ID:1407916

Diffusion cell and diffusion wafer experiments were conducted to compare methods for estimating matrix diffusion coefficients in rock core samples from Pahute Mesa at the Nevada Nuclear Security Site (NNSS). A diffusion wafer method, in which a solute diffuses out of a rock matrix that is pre-saturated with water containing the solute, is presented as a simpler alternative to the traditional through-diffusion (diffusion cell) method. Both methods yielded estimates of matrix diffusion coefficients that were within the range of values previously reported for NNSS volcanic rocks. The difference between the estimates of the two methods ranged from 14 to 30%, and there was no systematic high or low bias of one method relative to the other. From a transport modeling perspective, these differences are relatively minor when one considers that other variables (e.g., fracture apertures, fracture spacings) influence matrix diffusion to a greater degree and tend to have greater uncertainty than diffusion coefficients. For the same relative random errors in concentration measurements, the diffusion cell method yields diffusion coefficient estimates that have less uncertainty than the wafer method. However, the wafer method is easier and less costly to implement and yields estimates more quickly, thus allowing a greater number of samples to be analyzed for the same cost and time. Given the relatively good agreement between the methods, and the lack of any apparent bias between the methods, the diffusion wafer method appears to offer advantages over the diffusion cell method if better statistical representation of a given set of rock samples is desired.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM)
DOE Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
1407916
Report Number(s):
LA-UR--17-30221
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Comparison of experimental methods for estimating matrix diffusion coefficients for contaminant transport modeling
Journal Article · Tue Jan 30 23:00:00 EST 2018 · Journal of Contaminant Hydrology · OSTI ID:1419758

Report and analysis of the BULLION forced-gradient experiment
Technical Report · Sat Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 1998 · OSTI ID:305939

Summary of micrographic analysis of fracture coating phases on drill cores from Pahute Mesa, Nevada Test Site. Revision 1
Technical Report · Mon Nov 30 23:00:00 EST 1998 · OSTI ID:304001