Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

K-ε Turbulence Model Parameter Estimates Using an Approximate Self-similar Jet-in-Crossflow Solution

Journal Article · · AIAA Journal
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-4167· OSTI ID:1399490
 [1];  [2];  [2];  [2];  [1]
  1. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
  2. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)

The k-ε turbulence model has been described as perhaps “the most widely used complete turbulence model.” This family of heuristic Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence closures is supported by a suite of model parameters that have been estimated by demanding the satisfaction of well-established canonical flows such as homogeneous shear flow, log-law behavior, etc. While this procedure does yield a set of so-called nominal parameters, it is abundantly clear that they do not provide a universally satisfactory turbulence model that is capable of simulating complex flows. Recent work on the Bayesian calibration of the k-ε model using jet-in-crossflow wind tunnel data has yielded parameter estimates that are far more predictive than nominal parameter values. In this paper, we develop a self-similar asymptotic solution for axisymmetric jet-in-crossflow interactions and derive analytical estimates of the parameters that were inferred using Bayesian calibration. The self-similar method utilizes a near field approach to estimate the turbulence model parameters while retaining the classical far-field scaling to model flow field quantities. Our parameter values are seen to be far more predictive than the nominal values, as checked using RANS simulations and experimental measurements. They are also closer to the Bayesian estimates than the nominal parameters. A traditional simplified jet trajectory model is explicitly related to the turbulence model parameters and is shown to yield good agreement with measurement when utilizing the analytical derived turbulence model coefficients. Finally, the close agreement between the turbulence model coefficients obtained via Bayesian calibration and the analytically estimated coefficients derived in this paper is consistent with the contention that the Bayesian calibration approach is firmly rooted in the underlying physical description.

Research Organization:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
OSTI ID:
1399490
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1429825
Report Number(s):
SAND--2017-1388J; 651099
Journal Information:
AIAA Journal, Journal Name: AIAA Journal
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (14)

Turbulent Jets book January 2003
Bayesian calibration of the constants of the k–ε turbulence model for a CFD model of street canyon flow journal September 2014
Internal Flow: Concepts and Applications book January 2004
Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 1. Scaling laws for strong transverse jets journal September 2001
Structure and mixing of a transverse jet in incompressible flow journal November 1984
Profiles of the Round Turbulent Jet in A Cross Flow journal November 1967
Turbulent Energy Balance and Spectra of the Axisymmetric Wake journal January 1970
The Interaction of Jets with Crossflow journal January 2013
Scalar Fluctuation Modeling for High-Speed Aeropropulsive Flows journal May 2007
Crossplane Velocimetry of a Transverse Supersonic Jet in a Transonic Crossflow journal December 2006
Bayesian Parameter Estimation of a k-ε Model for Accurate Jet-in-Crossflow Simulations journal August 2016
Vortices induced in a jet by a subsonic cross flow journal February 1971
Turbulence model unification and assessment for high-speed aeropropulsive flows conference February 2013
Recalibration of the Shear Stress Transport Model to Improve Calculation of Shock Separated Flows conference January 2013

Cited By (1)

Adaptive wavelet compression of large additive manufacturing experimental and simulation datasets journal July 2018

Similar Records

Robust Bayesian Calibration of a k-ε Model for Compressible Jet-in-Crossflow Simulations
Journal Article · Fri Sep 28 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · AIAA Journal · OSTI ID:1478069

Estimation of k-ε parameters using surrogate models and jet-in-crossflow data
Technical Report · Sat Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · OSTI ID:1170402

Validation of Calibrated k–ε Model Parameters for Jet-in-Crossflow
Journal Article · Mon May 09 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · AIAA Journal · OSTI ID:1872012