Terrestrial ecosystem model performance in simulating productivity and its vulnerability to climate change in the northern permafrost region: Modeled Productivity in Permafrost Regions
Journal Article
·
· Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences
more »
- East China Normal Univ. (ECNU), Shanghai (China). Research Center for Global Change and Ecological Forecasting and Tiantong National Field Observation Station for Forest Ecosystem, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences
- Univ. of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK (United States). US Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit
- National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
- Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter (United Kingdom)
- Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Environmental Sciences Division
- Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA (United States). Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering
- Centre National de Recherches Meteorologiques (CNRM), Toulouse (France)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
- Univ. of Victoria, BC (Canada). School of Earth and Ocean Sciences
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), Gif-sur-Yvette (France); Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Grenoble (France). Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Geophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE); Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble (France). Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Geophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE)
- Beijing Normal Univ., Beijing (China). College of Global Change and Earth System Science; Alfred Wegener Inst. Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Potsdam (Germany)
- Japan Agency for Marine-Earth, Yokohama (Japan). Dept. of Integrated Climate Change Projection Research
- Univ. of Copenhagen (Denmark). Center for Permafrost (CENPERM), Dept. of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management
- Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), Gif-sur-Yvette (France)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Grenoble (France). Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Geophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE); Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble (France). Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Geophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE); Irstea, Villeurbanne (France)
- Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME (United States). School of Forest Resources
- Beijing Normal Univ., Beijing (China). College of Global Change and Earth System Science
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Grenoble (France). Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Geophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE); Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble (France). Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Geophysique de l'Environnement (LGGE)
- Lund Univ. (Sweden). Dept. of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science
- National Inst. of Polar Research, Tachikawa (Japan); Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama (Japan)
- Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK (United States). Dept. of Microbiology and Plant Biology
- Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK (United States). Dept. of Microbiology and Plant Biology; Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China). Dept. for Earth System Science
Realistic projection of future climate-carbon (C) cycle feedbacks requires better understanding and an improved representation of the C cycle in permafrost regions in the current generation of Earth system models. Here we evaluated 10 terrestrial ecosystem models for their estimates of net primary productivity (NPP) and responses to historical climate change in permafrost regions in the Northern Hemisphere. In comparison with the satellite estimate from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS; 246 ± 6 g C m-2 yr-1), most models produced higher NPP (309 ± 12 g C m-2 yr-1) over the permafrost region during 2000–2009. By comparing the simulated gross primary productivity (GPP) with a flux tower-based database, we found that although mean GPP among the models was only overestimated by 10% over 1982–2009, there was a twofold discrepancy among models (380 to 800 g C m-2 yr-1), which mainly resulted from differences in simulated maximum monthly GPP (GPPmax). Most models overestimated C use efficiency (CUE) as compared to observations at both regional and site levels. Further analysis shows that model variability of GPP and CUE are nonlinearly correlated to variability in specific leaf area and the maximum rate of carboxylation by the enzyme Rubisco at 25°C (Vcmax_25), respectively. The models also varied in their sensitivities of NPP, GPP, and CUE to historical changes in climate and atmospheric CO2 concentration. In conclusion, these results indicate that model predictive ability of the C cycle in permafrost regions can be improved by better representation of the processes controlling CUE and GPPmax as well as their sensitivity to climate change.
- Research Organization:
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE; National Science Foundation (NSF); European Union (EU)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC05-00OR22725; SC0008270; SC0014085
- OSTI ID:
- 1394452
- Alternate ID(s):
- OSTI ID: 1402146
OSTI ID: 1476459
OSTI ID: 23159807
- Journal Information:
- Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences, Journal Name: Journal of Geophysical Research. Biogeosciences Journal Issue: 2 Vol. 122; ISSN 2169-8953
- Publisher:
- American Geophysical UnionCopyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Variability in the sensitivity among model simulations of permafrost and carbon dynamics in the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009
Journal Article
·
Fri Jul 08 00:00:00 EDT 2016
· Global Biogeochemical Cycles
·
OSTI ID:1324174