Shortwave radiative forcing, rapid adjustment, and feedback to the surface by sulfate geoengineering: analysis of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario

Kashimura, Hiroki; Abe, Manabu; Watanabe, Shingo; Sekiya, Takashi; Ji, Duoying; Moore, John C.; Cole, Jason N. S.; Kravitz, Ben

doi:10.5194/acp-17-3339-2017

Title: Shortwave radiative forcing, rapid adjustment, and feedback to the surface by sulfate geoengineering: analysis of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario

Journal Article · Wed Mar 08 00:00:00 EST 2017 · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online)

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3339-2017· OSTI ID:1358481

Kashimura, Hiroki ^[1]; Abe, Manabu ^[2]; Watanabe, Shingo ^[2]; Sekiya, Takashi ^[2]; Ji, Duoying ^[3]; Moore, John C. ^[3]; Cole, Jason N. S. ^[4];

^[5]

Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama (Japan); Kobe Univ., Kobe (Japan)
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama (Japan)
Beijing Normal Univ., Beijing (China). College of Global Change and Earth System Science
Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC (Canada). Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States). Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division

This paper evaluates the forcing, rapid adjustment, and feedback of net shortwave radiation at the surface in the G4 experiment of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project by analysing outputs from six participating models. G4 involves injection of 5 Tg yr^-1 of SO₂, a sulfate aerosol precursor, into the lower stratosphere from year 2020 to 2069 against a background scenario of RCP4.5. A single-layer atmospheric model for shortwave radiative transfer is used to estimate the direct forcing of solar radiation management (SRM), and rapid adjustment and feedbacks from changes in the water vapour amount, cloud amount, and surface albedo (compared with RCP4.5). The analysis shows that the globally and temporally averaged SRM forcing ranges from -3.6 to -1.6 W m^-2, depending on the model. The sum of the rapid adjustments and feedback effects due to changes in the water vapour and cloud amounts increase the downwelling shortwave radiation at the surface by approximately 0.4 to 1.5 W m^-2 and hence weaken the effect of SRM by around 50 %. The surface albedo changes decrease the net shortwave radiation at the surface; it is locally strong (~-4 W m^-2) in snow and sea ice melting regions, but minor for the global average. The analyses show that the results of the G4 experiment, which simulates sulfate geoengineering, include large inter-model variability both in the direct SRM forcing and the shortwave rapid adjustment from change in the cloud amount, and imply a high uncertainty in modelled processes of sulfate aerosols and clouds.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE

Grant/Contract Number:: AC05-76RL01830

OSTI ID:: 1358481

Report Number(s):: PNNL-SA-118834

Journal Information:: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online), Vol. 17, Issue 5; ISSN 1680-7324

Publisher:: European Geosciences UnionCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 18 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (68)

Uncertainties in the 20th century carbon budget associated with land use change: LUC UNCERTAINTIES IN 20TH CENTURY CARBON BUDGET Arora, V. K.; Boer, G. J. Global Change Biology, Vol. 16, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02202.x	journal	February 2010
Transient climate carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering Matthews, H. D.; Caldeira, K. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 104, Issue 24 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0700419104	journal	June 2007
Development and evaluation of an Earth-System model – HadGEM2 Collins, W. J.; Bellouin, N.; Doutriaux-Boucher, M. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 4, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1051-2011	journal	January 2011
Sea spray geoengineering experiments in the geoengineering model intercomparison project (GeoMIP): Experimental design and preliminary results: GEOMIP MARINE CLOUD BRIGHTENING Kravitz, Ben; Forster, Piers M.; Jones, Andy Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 19 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50856	journal	October 2013
Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5 Dufresne, J. -L.; Foujols, M. -A.; Denvil, S. Climate Dynamics, Vol. 40, Issue 9-10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1636-1	journal	February 2013
Climatic impacts of stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection Jones, Anthony C.; Haywood, James M.; Jones, Andy Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 16, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2843-2016	journal	January 2016
A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models Colman, R. Climate Dynamics, Vol. 20, Issue 7-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0310-z	journal	March 2003
The updated effective radiative forcing of major anthropogenic aerosols and their effects on global climate at present and in the future: AEROSOLS' EFFECTIVE RADIATIVE FORCING AND CLIMATIC EFFECTS Zhang, Hua; Zhao, Shuyun; Wang, Zhili International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 36, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4613	journal	January 2016
Chemical ozone loss in the Arctic winter 1991–1992 Tilmes, S.; Müller, R.; Salawitch, R. J. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 7, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-7-10097-2007	journal	January 2007
Radiative forcing and climate response to projected 21st century aerosol decreases Westervelt, D. M.; Horowitz, L. W.; Naik, V. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 22 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12681-2015	journal	January 2015
Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? Crutzen, Paul J. Climatic Change, Vol. 77, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y	journal	July 2006
Using an AGCM to Diagnose Historical Effective Radiative Forcing and Mechanisms of Recent Decadal Climate Change Andrews, Timothy Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-13-00336.1	journal	February 2014
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate Rasool, S. I.; Schneider, S. H. Science, Vol. 173, Issue 3992 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3992.138	journal	July 1971
Solar Radiation Effect on Crop Production Campillo, Carlos; Fortes, Rafael; del Henar Prieto, Maria Solar Radiation https://doi.org/10.5772/34796	book	March 2012
Quantifying the temperature-independent effect of stratospheric aerosol geoengineering on global-mean precipitation in a multi-model ensemble Ferraro, Angus J.; Griffiths, Hannah G. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 11, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034012	journal	March 2016
The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections Iversen, T.; Bentsen, M.; Bethke, I. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-389-2013	journal	January 2013
Inability of stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to preserve the West Antarctic Ice Sheet: STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOLS AND WAIS McCusker, K. E.; Battisti, D. S.; Bitz, C. M. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl064314	journal	June 2015
Impacts, effectiveness and regional inequalities of the GeoMIP G1 to G4 solar radiation management scenarios Yu, Xiaoyong; Moore, John C.; Cui, Xuefeng Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.02.010	journal	June 2015
The energy balance over land and oceans: an assessment based on direct observations and CMIP5 climate models Wild, Martin; Folini, Doris; Hakuba, Maria Z. Climate Dynamics, Vol. 44, Issue 11-12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2430-z	journal	December 2014
The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone Heckendorn, P.; Weisenstein, D.; Fueglistaler, S. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 4, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/045108	journal	October 2009
Stratospheric aerosol-Observations, processes, and impact on climate: Stratospheric Aerosol Kremser, Stefanie; Thomason, Larry W.; von Hobe, Marc Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 54, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000511	journal	May 2016
Geoengineering by stratospheric SO ₂ injection: results from the Met Office HadGEM2 climate model and comparison with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE Jones, A.; Haywood, J.; Boucher, O. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 10, Issue 13 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5999-2010	journal	January 2010
Chemical ozone loss in the Arctic winter 1991–1992 Tilmes, S.; Müller, R.; Salawitch, R. J. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 8, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1897-2008	journal	January 2008
What is the limit of climate engineering by stratospheric injection of SO ₂ ? Niemeier, U.; Timmreck, C. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 15, Issue 16 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9129-2015	journal	January 2015
Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO ₂ : climate responses simulated by four earth system models Schmidt, H.; Alterskjær, K.; Bou Karam, D. Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 3, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-3-63-2012	journal	January 2012
The hydrological sensitivity to global warming and solar geoengineering derived from thermodynamic constraints Kleidon, Axel; Kravitz, Ben; Renner, Maik Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl062589	journal	January 2015
The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Kravitz, Ben; Robock, Alan; Boucher, Olivier Atmospheric Science Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.316	journal	January 2011
Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GEOMIP MODEL RESPONSE Kravitz, Ben; Caldeira, Ken; Boucher, Olivier Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 15 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50646	journal	August 2013
An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols Rasch, Philip J.; Tilmes, Simone; Turco, Richard P. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 366, Issue 1882 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0131	journal	August 2008
The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 2: Climate response and scenario projections Iversen, T.; Bentsen, M.; Bethke, I. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 5, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-5-2933-2012	journal	January 2012
The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate Bentsen, M.; Bethke, I.; Debernard, J. B. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 6, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013	journal	January 2013
Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle Bala, G.; Duffy, P. B.; Taylor, K. E. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue 22 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711648105	journal	May 2008
Description and basic evaluation of Beijing Normal University Earth System Model (BNU-ESM) version 1 Ji, D.; Wang, L.; Feng, J. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 7, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-2039-2014	journal	January 2014
A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization Wigley, T. M. L. Science, Vol. 314, Issue 5798 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131728	journal	October 2006
MIROC-ESM 2010: model description and basic results of CMIP5-20c3m experiments Watanabe, S.; Hajima, T.; Sudo, K. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 4, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-845-2011	journal	January 2011
Shortwave and longwave radiative contributions to global warming under increasing CO ₂ Donohoe, Aaron; Armour, Kyle C.; Pendergrass, Angeline G. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 111, Issue 47 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412190111	journal	November 2014
The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): THE TERMINATION EFFECT IN GEOMIP G2 Jones, Andy; Haywood, Jim M.; Alterskjaer, Kari Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 17 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50762	journal	September 2013
Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models: CLIMATE SENSITIVITY IN CMIP5 MODELS Andrews, Timothy; Gregory, Jonathan M.; Webb, Mark J. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051607	journal	May 2012
Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases: ALLOWABLE FUTURE CARBON EMISSIONS Arora, V. K.; Scinocca, J. F.; Boer, G. J. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046270	journal	March 2011
Aerosol forcing in the Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate Bellouin, Nicolas; Rae, Jamie; Jones, Andy Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116, Issue D20 https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016074	journal	January 2011
Atmospheric and Surface Contributions to Planetary Albedo Donohoe, Aaron; Battisti, David S. Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 16 https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3946.1	journal	August 2011
Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO ₂ -induced climate change Govindasamy, Bala; Caldeira, Ken Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL006086	journal	July 2000
Impact of geoengineering schemes on the terrestrial biosphere: IMPACT OF GEOENGINEERING SCHEMES ON THE TERRESTRIAL BIOSPHERE Govindasamy, B.; Thompson, S.; Duffy, P. B. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 29, Issue 22 https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015911	journal	November 2002
Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate climate change from a quadrupling of CO2 Govindasamy, B.; Caldeira, K.; Duffy, P. B. Global and Planetary Change, Vol. 37, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(02)00195-9	journal	June 2003
A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity Gregory, J. M. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 31, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018747	journal	January 2004
Global sensitivity studies of the direct radiative forcing due to anthropogenic sulfate and black carbon aerosols Haywood, J. M.; Ramaswamy, V. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 103, Issue D6 https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD03426	journal	March 1998
Sensitivity of volcanic aerosol dispersion to meteorological conditions: A Pinatubo case study: Volcanic Aerosol and Meteorology Jones, Anthony C.; Haywood, James M.; Jones, Andy Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025001	journal	June 2016
The Delta-Eddington Approximation for Radiative Flux Transfer Joseph, J. H.; Wiscombe, W. J.; Weinman, J. A. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 33, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<2452:TDEAFR>2.0.CO;2	journal	December 1976
An energetic perspective on hydrological cycle changes in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project: GeoMIP ENERGETIC PERSPECTIVE Kravitz, Ben; Rasch, Philip J.; Forster, Piers M. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 23 https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020502	journal	December 2013
An overview of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GEOMIP INTRODUCTION Kravitz, Ben; Robock, Alan; Forster, Piers M. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 23 https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020569	journal	December 2013
Arctic sea ice and atmospheric circulation under the GeoMIP G1 scenario Moore, John C.; Rinke, Annette; Yu, Xiaoyong Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021060	journal	January 2014
The Impact of Mount Pinatubo on World-Wide Temperatures Parker, D. E.; Wilson, H.; Jones, P. D. International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 16, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199605)16:5<487::AID-JOC39>3.0.CO;2-J	journal	May 1996
Efficient formation of stratospheric aerosol for climate engineering by emission of condensible vapor from aircraft: AEROSOL FROM CONDENSIBLE VAPOR Pierce, Jeffrey R.; Weisenstein, Debra K.; Heckendorn, Patricia Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043975	journal	September 2010
Impact of Future Climate and Emission Changes on Stratospheric Aerosols and Ozone Pitari, G.; Mancini, E.; Rizi, V. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 59, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0414:IOFCAE>2.0.CO;2	journal	February 2002
Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): GeoMIP ozone response Pitari, Giovanni; Aquila, Valentina; Kravitz, Ben Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 119, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020566	journal	March 2014
Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size Rasch, Philip J.; Crutzen, Paul J.; Coleman, Danielle B. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 35, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032179	journal	January 2008
Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO ₂ injections Robock, Alan; Oman, Luke; Stenchikov, Georgiy L. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, Issue D16 https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010050	journal	January 2008
Stratospheric aerosol optical depths, 1850–1990 Sato, Makiko; Hansen, James E.; McCormick, M. Patrick Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 98, Issue D12 https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02553	journal	January 1993
Present-Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In Situ, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data Schmidt, Gavin A.; Ruedy, Reto; Hansen, James E. Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3612.1	journal	January 2006
Evolution of stratospheric sulfate aerosol from the 1991 Pinatubo eruption: Roles of aerosol microphysical processes: ROLE OF MICROPHYSICS IN VOLCANIC AEROSOL Sekiya, T.; Sudo, K.; Nagai, T. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024313	journal	March 2016
Adjustments in the Forcing-Feedback Framework for Understanding Climate Change Sherwood, Steven C.; Bony, Sandrine; Boucher, Olivier Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00167.1	journal	February 2015
An Assessment of Climate Feedbacks in Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models Soden, Brian J.; Held, Isaac M. Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3799.1	journal	July 2006
On the Use of Cloud Forcing to Estimate Cloud Feedback Soden, Brian J.; Broccoli, Anthony J.; Hemler, Richard S. Journal of Climate, Vol. 17, Issue 19 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<3661:OTUOCF>2.0.CO;2	journal	October 2004
Earth’s Energy Imbalance Trenberth, Kevin E.; Fasullo, John T.; Balmaseda, Magdalena A. Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00294.1	journal	May 2014
Diagnostic study of climate feedback processes in atmospheric general circulation models Zhang, M. H.; Hack, J. J.; Kiehl, J. T. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 99, Issue D3 https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD03523	journal	January 1994
Climatic impacts of stratospheric geoengineering with sulfate, black carbon and titania injection Jones, A. C.; Haywood, J. M.; Jones, A. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-30043-2015	posted_content	November 2015
Development and evaluation of an Earth-system model – HadGEM2 Collins, W. J.; Bellouin, N.; Doutriaux-Boucher, M. Geoscientific Model Development Discussions, Vol. 4, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmdd-4-997-2011	journal	January 2011
Geoengineering by stratospheric SO₂ injection: results from the Met Office HadGEM2 climate model and comparison with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE Jones, A.; Haywood, J.; Boucher, O. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-7421-2010	posted_content	March 2010

Cited By (6)

Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering Ji, Duoying; Fang, Songsong; Curry, Charles L. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018	journal	January 2018
Global streamflow and flood response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering Wei, Liren; Ji, Duoying; Miao, Chiyuan Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 21 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16033-2018	journal	January 2018
Land Surface Cooling Induced by Sulfate Geoengineering Constrained by Major Volcanic Eruptions Plazzotta, Maxime; Séférian, Roland; Douville, Hervé Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl077583	journal	June 2018
Developing a monthly radiative kernel for surface albedo change from satellite climatologies of Earth's shortwave radiation budget: CACK v1.0 Bright, Ryan M.; O'Halloran, Thomas L. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3975-2019	journal	January 2019
Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering Ji, Duoying; Fang, Songsong; Curry, Charles L. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-131	posted_content	March 2018
A statistical examination of the effects of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering on tropical storm genesis Wang, Qin; Moore, John C.; Ji, Duoying Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 13 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9173-2018	journal	January 2018

Similar Records

Impact of solar geoengineering on temperatures over the Indonesian Maritime Continent

Journal Article · Wed Sep 29 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · International Journal of Climatology · OSTI ID:1358481

Kuswanto, Heri; Kravitz, Ben; Miftahurrohmah, Brina; +3 more

The G4Foam Experiment: Global climate impacts of regional ocean albedo modification

Journal Article · Thu Jan 12 00:00:00 EST 2017 · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (Online) · OSTI ID:1358481

Gabriel, Corey J.; Robock, Alan; Xia, Lili; +2 more

Contributions of Different Cloud Types to Feedbacks and Rapid Adjustments in CMIP5*

Journal Article · Mon Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2013 · Journal of Climate · OSTI ID:1358481

Zelinka, Mark D.; Klein, Stephen A.; Taylor, Karl E.; +4 more

Related Subjects

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
58 GEOSCIENCES

Title: Shortwave radiative forcing, rapid adjustment, and feedback to the surface by sulfate geoengineering: analysis of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G4 scenario

Citation Formats

References (68)

Cited By (6)

Similar Records

Related Subjects