skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Probabilistic cost estimation methods for treatment of water extracted during CO2 storage and EOR

Journal Article · · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
 [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)

Extraction and treatment of in situ water can minimize risk for large-scale CO2 injection in saline aquifers during carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS), and for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Additionally, treatment and reuse of oil and gas produced waters for hydraulic fracturing will conserve scarce fresh-water resources. Each treatment step, including transportation and waste disposal, generates economic and engineering challenges and risks; these steps should be factored into a comprehensive assessment. We expand the water treatment model (WTM) coupled within the sequestration system model CO2-PENS and use chemistry data from seawater and proposed injection sites in Wyoming, to demonstrate the relative importance of different water types on costs, including little-studied effects of organic pretreatment and transportation. We compare the WTM with an engineering water treatment model, utilizing energy costs and transportation costs. Specific energy costs for treatment of Madison Formation brackish and saline base cases and for seawater compared closely between the two models, with moderate differences for scenarios incorporating energy recovery. Transportation costs corresponded for all but low flow scenarios (<5000 m3/d). Some processes that have high costs (e.g., truck transportation) do not contribute the most variance to overall costs. Other factors, including feed-water temperature and water storage costs, are more significant contributors to variance. These results imply that the WTM can provide good estimates of treatment and related process costs (AACEI equivalent level 5, concept screening, or level 4, study or feasibility), and the complex relationships between processes when extracted waters are evaluated for use during CCUS and EOR site development.

Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE; USDOE Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
1227102
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1251683
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-15-25635; PII: S1750583615300359
Journal Information:
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Vol. 41, Issue C; ISSN 1750-5836
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 7 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (24)

Fresh water generation from aquifer-pressured carbon storage: Feasibility of treating saline formation waters journal January 2011
Comparative study on the radioactivity of TE-NORM in different components of oil separator tanks journal November 2012
Fundamentals and costing of MSF desalination plants and comparison with other technologies journal November 2005
A preliminary cost and engineering estimate for desalinating produced formation water associated with carbon dioxide capture and storage journal September 2011
Origin and evolution of weber and tensleep formation waters in the greater green river and Uinta-Piceance basins, Northern rocky mountain area, U.S.A. journal August 1987
Combining brine extraction, desalination, and residual-brine reinjection with CO2 storage in saline formations: Implications for pressure management, capacity, and risk mitigation journal January 2011
Operational Cost Comparison of Several Pre-Treatment Techniques for OMW Treatment journal November 2011
Composite Geochemical Database for Coalbed Methane Produced Water Quality in the Rocky Mountain Region journal September 2011
Conventional pretreatment system for the Doha Reverse Osmosis Plant: Technical and economic assessment journal October 1995
A new chemical classification system of natural waters for desalination and other industrial uses journal August 2003
Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment journal October 2009
State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination journal October 2007
A methodology to investigate brackish groundwater desalination coupled with aquifer recharge by treated wastewater as an alternative strategy for water supply in Mediterranean areas journal May 2001
Reverse osmosis desalination: Water sources, technology, and today's challenges journal May 2009
Combining power plant water needs and carbon dioxide storage using saline formations: Implications for carbon dioxide and water management policies journal July 2011
UV/H 2 O 2 Treatment: A Practical Solution for Organic Contaminant Control and Primary Disinfection journal July 2007
A new optimization approach to energy network modeling: anthropogenic CO 2 capture coupled with enhanced oil recovery : A new optimization approach to energy network modeling journal December 2012
The cross-scale science of CO2 capture and storage: from pore scale to regional scale journal January 2012
Distribution of alkalinity in the surface waters of the major oceans journal February 1998
Advances in desalination technology journal January 2005
BTEX Removal from Produced Water Using Surfactant-Modified Zeolite journal March 2005
Desalination and Reuse of High-Salinity Shale Gas Produced Water: Drivers, Technologies, and Future Directions journal August 2013
Baseline geochemical characterization of potential receiving reservoirs for carbon dioxide in the Greater Green River Basin, Wyoming journal October 2010
A method and cost model for treatment of water extracted during geologic CO2 storage journal January 2013

Cited By (1)

Oil and Gas Produced Water, High‐Salinity Brines, and Associated Cost Modeling book January 2019