skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Environmental and Operational Performance of CO2-EOR as a CCUS Technology: A Cranfield Example with Dynamic LCA Considerations

Journal Article · · Energies
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030448· OSTI ID:1493096
; ;

This study evaluates the potential of carbon dioxide-enhanced oil recovery (CO2-EOR) to reduce greenhouse gas emissions without compromising oil production goals. A novel, dynamic carbon lifecycle analysis (d-LCA) was developed and used to understand the evolution of the environmental impact (CO2 emissions) and mitigation (geologic CO2 storage) associated with an expanded carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) system, from start to closure of operations. EOR operational performance was assessed through CO2 utilization rates, which relate usage of CO2 to oil production. Because field operational strategies have a significant impact on reservoir engineering parameters that affect both CO2 storage and oil production (e.g., sweep efficiency, flood conformance, fluid saturation distribution), we conducted a scenario analysis that assessed the operational and environmental performance of four common and novel CO2-EOR field development strategies. Each scenario was evaluated with and without stacked saline carbon storage, an EOR/storage combination strategy where excess CO2 from the recycling facility is injected into an underlying saline aquifer for long-term carbon storage. The dynamic interplay between operational and environmental performance formed the basis of our CCUS technology analysis. The results showed that all CO2-EOR evaluated scenarios start operating with a negative carbon footprint and, years into the project, transitioned into operating with a positive carbon footprint. The transition points were significantly different in each scenario. Water-alternating-gas (WAG) was identified as the CO2 injection strategy with the highest potential to co-optimize EOR and carbon storage goals. The results provide an understanding of the evolution of the system’s net carbon balance in all four field development strategies studied. The environmental performance can be significantly improved with stacked storage, where a negative carbon footprint can be maintained throughout the life of the operation in most of the injection scenarios modelled. This information will be useful to CO2-EOR operators seeking value in storing more CO2 through a carbon credit program (e.g., the 45Q carbon credit program in the USA). Most importantly, this study serves as confirmation that CO2-EOR can be operationally designed to both enhance oil production and reduce greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere.

Research Organization:
Univ. of Texas, Austin, TX (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE)
Grant/Contract Number:
FE0024433; FC26-05NT42590
OSTI ID:
1493096
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1525484
Journal Information:
Energies, Journal Name: Energies Vol. 12 Journal Issue: 3; ISSN 1996-1073
Publisher:
MDPI AGCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
Switzerland
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 26 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (16)

Reducing Carbon Dioxide Emissions with Enhanced Oil Recovery Projects:  A Life Cycle Assessment Approach journal March 2001
Uncertainty Quantification for CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery journal January 2014
Update of Industry Experience With CO2 Injection conference April 2013
Analysis of CO 2 storage mechanisms at a CO 2 -EOR site, Cranfield, Mississippi : Original Research Article: Analysis of CO journal January 2018
Implications of Water-Alternate-Gas Injection, for Profile Control and Injectivity conference April 2013
Carbon Balance of CO2-EOR for NCNO Classification journal July 2017
Life-cycle Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Capture for Enhanced Oil Recovery journal June 2008
Life-Cycle Analysis of CO 2 EOR on EOR and Geological Storage through Economic Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis Using the Weyburn Unit as a Case Study † journal April 2006
Static and dynamic reservoir modeling for geological CO2 sequestration at Cranfield, Mississippi, U.S.A. journal October 2013
Carbon Dioxide Flooding As An Enhanced Oil Recovery Process journal September 1992
Impact of field development strategies on CO2 trapping mechanisms in a CO2–EOR field: A case study in the permian basin (SACROC unit) journal May 2018
Evaluating the Climate Benefits of CO 2 -Enhanced Oil Recovery Using Life Cycle Analysis journal June 2015
Effect of Heterogeneity on Fluid-Injectivity Loss During Water-Alternating-Gas Injection in the Scurry Area Canyon Reef Operators Committee Unit journal May 2017
Opportunities for Using Anthropogenic CO 2 for Enhanced Oil Recovery and CO 2 Storage journal March 2013
Life Cycle Inventory of CO 2 in an Enhanced Oil Recovery System journal November 2009
Co-optimization of CO 2 -EOR and storage processes in mature oil reservoirs : Original Research Article: Co-optimization of CO journal August 2016

Figures / Tables (13)

Table 1(p. 2)table Table 1
Figure 1(p. 4)figure Figure 1
Figure 2(p. 6)figure Figure 2
Figure 3(p. 6)figure Figure 3
Table 2(p. 8)table Table 2
Figure 4(p. 9)figure Figure 4
Figure 5(p. 9)figure Figure 5
Figure 6(p. 10)figure Figure 6
Figure 7(p. 11)figure Figure 7
Table 3(p. 11)table Table 3
Figure 8(p. 12)figure Figure 8
Figure 9(p. 12)figure Figure 9
Table 4(p. 13)table Table 4

Similar Records

Related Subjects

58 GEOSCIENCES
CO2-EOR
geologic carbon sequestration
CCUS
co-optimization
carbon balance
LCA