Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Hybrid statistical testing for nuclear material accounting data and/or process monitoring data in nuclear safeguards

Journal Article · · Energies
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/en8010501· OSTI ID:1193445
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
The aim of nuclear safeguards is to ensure that special nuclear material is used for peaceful purposes. Historically, nuclear material accounting (NMA) has provided the quantitative basis for monitoring for nuclear material loss or diversion, and process monitoring (PM) data is collected by the operator to monitor the process. PM data typically support NMA in various ways, often by providing a basis to estimate some of the in-process nuclear material inventory. We develop options for combining PM residuals and NMA residuals (residual = measurement - prediction), using a hybrid of period-driven and data-driven hypothesis testing. The modified statistical tests can be used on time series of NMA residuals (the NMA residual is the familiar material balance), or on a combination of PM and NMA residuals. The PM residuals can be generated on a fixed time schedule or as events occur.
Research Organization:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
OSTI ID:
1193445
Report Number(s):
LA-UR--14-27526; PII: en8010501
Journal Information:
Energies, Journal Name: Energies Journal Issue: 1 Vol. 8; ISSN ENERGA; ISSN 1996-1073
Publisher:
MDPI AGCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (17)

Safeguards design for a plutonium concentrator journal November 1980
Model selection and change detection for a time-varying mean in process monitoring
  • Burr, Tom; Hamada, Michael S.; Ticknor, Larry
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 751 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2014.03.023
journal July 2014
Fuel Conditioning Facility Electrorefiner Process Model journal June 2006
Simultaneous estimation of computer model parameters and model bias journal August 2012
Inspector interfaces to facilitate subjective reasoning about quantities in trends journal January 2013
Signal estimation and change detection in tank data for nuclear safeguards
  • Burr, Tom; Suzuki, Mitsutoshi; Howell, John
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 640, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.02.078
journal June 2011
Proof of concept experiments of the multi-isotope process monitor: An online, nondestructive, near real-time monitor for spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities
  • Orton, Christopher R.; Fraga, Carlos G.; Christensen, Richard N.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 672 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2011.12.083
journal April 2012
Numerical assessment of pyrochemical process performance for PEACER system journal June 2010
Integration of facility modeling capabilities for nuclear nonproliferation analysis journal January 2012
Kinetic model for electrorefining, part I: Model development and validation journal January 2014
Loss detection results on simulated tank data modified by realistic effects journal February 2012
Solution Monitoring: Quantitative and Qualitative Benefits to Nuclear Safeguards journal April 2003
Study on Loss Detection Algorithms Using Tank Monitoring Data journal February 2009
Estimating Alarm Thresholds for Process Monitoring Data under Different Assumptions about the Data Generating Mechanism journal January 2013
Revisiting Statistical Aspects of Nuclear Material Accounting journal January 2013
Smoothing and Time Series Modeling of Nuclear Material Accounting Data for Protracted Diversion Detection journal July 2014
Distribution-free discriminant analysis journal November 2007