Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

A comparison of the effect of the first and second upwind schemes on the predictions of the modified RELAP5/MOD3

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/115076· OSTI ID:115076
 [1]
  1. Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen (Switzerland)
As is well-known, both TRAC-BF1 and TRAC-PF are using the first upwind scheme when finite-differencing the phasic momentum equations. In contrast, RELAP5 uses the second upwind which is less diffusive. In this work, we shall assess the differences between the two schemes with our modified version of RELAP5/MOD3 by analyzing some transients of interest. These will include the LOFT LP-LB-1 and LOBI small break LOCA (SB-LOCA) BL34 tests, and a commercial PWR 200% hypothetical large break LOCA (LB-LOCA). In particular, we shall show that for some of these transients, the employment of the first upwind scheme results in significantly different code predictions than the ones obtained when the second upwind scheme is used.
Research Organization:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (United States). Div. of Systems Technology; American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL (United States); American Inst. of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY (United States); American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY (United States); Canadian Nuclear Society, Toronto, ON (Canada); European Nuclear Society (ENS), Bern (Switzerland); Atomic Energy Society of Japan, Tokyo (Japan); Japan Society of Multiphase Flow, Kyoto (Japan)
OSTI ID:
115076
Report Number(s):
NUREG/CP--0142-Vol.3; CONF-950904--Vol.3; ON: TI95017079
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

The RELAP5/MOD3 computer code
Conference · Sat Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1988 · OSTI ID:6980462

Plans and status of RELAP5/MOD3
Conference · Sat Dec 31 23:00:00 EST 1988 · OSTI ID:7038326

Higher-order linearization scheme for the interfacial shear of RELAP5/MOD3.1 and velocity iterations
Journal Article · Mon Dec 30 23:00:00 EST 1996 · Transactions of the American Nuclear Society · OSTI ID:427067