Demonstrate the removal efficiency and capacity of MOF materials for krypton recovery
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Metal organic framework materials (MOFs) were developed and tested in support of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy, Fuel Cycle Technology Separations and Waste Forms Campaign. Specifically, materials are being developed for the removal of xenon (Xe) and krypton (Kr) from gaseous products of nuclear fuel reprocessing unit operations. Two metal organic framework structures were investigated in greater detail to demonstrate the removal efficiency and capacity of MOF materials for krypton recovery. Our two bed breakthrough measurements on NiDOBDC and FMOFCu indicate these materials can capture and separate parts per million levels of Xe and Kr from air. The removal efficiency and adsorption capacity for Kr on these two MOFs were further increased upon removal of Xe upfront.
- Research Organization:
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Supply Chain
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-76RL01830
- OSTI ID:
- 1111231
- Report Number(s):
- PNNL--22693; FCR&D-SWF--2013-000278; AF5805000
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
A Two-Column Method for the Separation of Kr and Xe from Process Off-Gases
Initial proof-of-principle for near room temperature Xe and Kr separation from air with MOFs
Facile xenon capture and release at room temperature using a metal-organic framework: a comparison with activated charcoal
Journal Article
·
Tue Jul 29 00:00:00 EDT 2014
· Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 53(32):12893-12899
·
OSTI ID:1171292
Initial proof-of-principle for near room temperature Xe and Kr separation from air with MOFs
Technical Report
·
Wed Jun 06 00:00:00 EDT 2012
·
OSTI ID:1122332
Facile xenon capture and release at room temperature using a metal-organic framework: a comparison with activated charcoal
Journal Article
·
Tue Jan 10 23:00:00 EST 2012
· Chemical Communications, 48(3):347-349
·
OSTI ID:1032679