skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
  1. Software for the frontiers of quantum chemistry: An overview of developments in the Q-Chem 5 package

    This article summarizes technical advances contained in the fifth major release of the Q-Chem quantum chemistry program package, covering developments since 2015. A comprehensive library of exchange-correlation functionals, along with a suite of correlated many-body methods, continues to be a hallmark of the Q-Chem software. The many-body methods include novel variants of both coupled-cluster and configuration-interaction approaches along with methods based on the algebraic diagrammatic construction and variational reduced density-matrix methods. Methods highlighted in Q-Chem 5 include a suite of tools for modeling core-level spectroscopy, methods for describing metastable resonances, methods for computing vibronic spectra, the nuclear-electronic orbital method, andmore » several different energy decomposition analysis techniques. High-performance capabilities including multithreaded parallelism and support for calculations on graphics processing units are described. Q-Chem boasts a community of well over 100 active academic developers, and the continuing evolution of the software is supported by an "open teamware" model and an increasingly modular design.« less
  2. Effective empirical corrections for basis set superposition error in the def2-SVPD basis: gCP and DFT-C

    With the aim of mitigating the basis set error in density functional theory (DFT) calculations employing local basis sets, we herein develop two empirical corrections for basis set superposition error (BSSE) in the def2-SVPD basis, a basis which - when stripped of BSSE - is capable of providing near-complete-basis DFT results for non-covalent interactions. Specifically, we adapt the existing pairwise geometrical counterpoise (gCP) approach to the def2-SVPD basis, and we develop a beyond-pairwise approach, DFT-C, which we parameterize across a small set of intermolecular interactions. Both gCP and DFT-C are evaluated against the traditional Boys-Bernardi counterpoise correction across a setmore » of 3402 non-covalent binding energies and isomerization energies. We find that the DFT-C method represents a significant improvement over gCP, particularly for non-covalently-interacting molecular clusters. Furthermore, DFT-C is transferable among density functionals and can be combined with existing functionals - such as B97M-V - to recover large-basis results at a fraction of the cost.« less
  3. Assessing DFT-D3 Damping Functions Across Widely Used Density Functionals: Can We Do Better?

    With the aim of improving the utility of the DFT-D3 empirical dispersion correction, we herein generalize the DFT-D3 damping function by optimizing an additional parameter, an exponent, which controls the rate at which the dispersion tail is activated. This method- DFT-D3(op), shorthand for “optimized power,” where power refers to the newly introduced exponent- is then parametrized for use with ten popular density functional approximations across a small set of noncovalent interactions and isomerization energies; the resulting methods are then evaluated across a large independent test set of 2475 noncovalent binding energies and isomerization energies. We find that the DFT-D3(op) tailmore » represents a substantial improvement over existing damping functions, as it affords significant reductions in errors associated with noncovalent interaction energies and geometries. Finally, the revPBE0-D3(op) and MS2-D3(op) methods in particular stand out, and our extensive testing indicates they are competitive with other modern density functionals.« less
  4. Push it to the limit: Characterizing the convergence of common sequences of basis sets for intermolecular interactions as described by density functional theory

    With the aim of systematically characterizing the convergence of common families of basis sets such that general recommendations for basis sets can be made, we have tested a wide variety of basis sets against complete-basis binding energies across the S22 set of intermolecular interactions - noncovalent interactions of small and medium-sized molecules consisting of first- and second-row atoms - with three distinct density functional approximations: SPW92, a form of local-density approximation; B3LYP, a global hybrid generalized gradient approximation; and B97M-V, a meta-generalized gradient approximation with nonlocal correlation. We have found that it is remarkably difficult to reach the basis setmore » limit; for the methods and systems examined, the most complete basis is Jensen's pc-4. The Dunning correlation-consistent sequence of basis sets converges slowly relative to the Jensen sequence. The Karlsruhe basis sets are quite cost effective, particularly when a correction for basis set superposition error is applied: counterpoise-corrected def2-SVPD binding energies are better than corresponding energies computed in comparably sized Dunning and Jensen bases, and on par with uncorrected results in basis sets 3-4 times larger. These trends are exhibited regardless of the level of density functional approximation employed. In conclusion, a sense of the magnitude of the intrinsic incompleteness error of each basis set not only provides a foundation for guiding basis set choice in future studies but also facilitates quantitative comparison of existing studies on similar types of systems.« less

Search for:
All Records
Author / Contributor
0000000270167346

Refine by:
Resource Type
Availability
Author / Contributor
Research Organization