An evaluation of internal event level 1 PRA methods used in NUREG-1150
Conference
·
OSTI ID:6324022
As part of the effort to support NUREG-1150, Sandia National Laboratories and its subcontractors have developed innovative techniques for efficiently performing internal event Level I probabilistic risk assessments. This methodology is one of the alternatives for industry to use in performing individual plant evaluations in the future. While this new methodology was very successful, there are some areas where improvements can be made. This paper evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the methodology and makes some important recommendations for modifications in order to provide insights to future users. 10 refs.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC04-76DP00789
- OSTI ID:
- 6324022
- Report Number(s):
- SAND-88-1455C; CONF-890405-12; ON: DE89005232; TRN: 89-008351
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: International topical meeting on probability, reliability and safety assessment, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2 Apr 1989; Other Information: Portions of this document are illegible in microfiche products
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
DOE safety goals comparison using NUREG-1150 PRA (probabilistic risk assessment) methodology
Characterization of the internal event frequencies for the final NUREG-1150
N reactor level III probabilistic risk assessment using NUREG-1150 methods
Conference
·
Fri Jun 01 00:00:00 EDT 1990
·
OSTI ID:6324022
Characterization of the internal event frequencies for the final NUREG-1150
Conference
·
Thu Jun 30 00:00:00 EDT 1988
·
OSTI ID:6324022
N reactor level III probabilistic risk assessment using NUREG-1150 methods
Journal Article
·
Fri Nov 01 00:00:00 EST 1991
· Nuclear Technology; (United States)
·
OSTI ID:6324022
+9 more
Related Subjects
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
RISK ASSESSMENT
EVALUATION
GRAND GULF-1 REACTOR
GRAND GULF-2 REACTOR
HUMAN FACTORS
PEACH BOTTOM-1 REACTOR
PEACH BOTTOM-2 REACTOR
PEACH BOTTOM-3 REACTOR
PERFORMANCE
REACTOR ACCIDENTS
SEQUOYAH-1 REACTOR
SEQUOYAH-2 REACTOR
SURRY-1 REACTOR
SURRY-2 REACTOR
SURRY-3 REACTOR
SURRY-4 REACTOR
SYSTEM FAILURE ANALYSIS
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
US NRC
ACCIDENTS
BWR TYPE REACTORS
ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS
GAS COOLED REACTORS
GRAPHITE MODERATED REACTORS
HELIUM COOLED REACTORS
HTGR TYPE REACTORS
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
POWER PLANTS
POWER REACTORS
PWR TYPE REACTORS
REACTORS
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
THERMAL REACTORS
US ORGANIZATIONS
WATER COOLED REACTORS
WATER MODERATED REACTORS
220900* - Nuclear Reactor Technology- Reactor Safety
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
RISK ASSESSMENT
EVALUATION
GRAND GULF-1 REACTOR
GRAND GULF-2 REACTOR
HUMAN FACTORS
PEACH BOTTOM-1 REACTOR
PEACH BOTTOM-2 REACTOR
PEACH BOTTOM-3 REACTOR
PERFORMANCE
REACTOR ACCIDENTS
SEQUOYAH-1 REACTOR
SEQUOYAH-2 REACTOR
SURRY-1 REACTOR
SURRY-2 REACTOR
SURRY-3 REACTOR
SURRY-4 REACTOR
SYSTEM FAILURE ANALYSIS
SYSTEMS ANALYSIS
US NRC
ACCIDENTS
BWR TYPE REACTORS
ENRICHED URANIUM REACTORS
GAS COOLED REACTORS
GRAPHITE MODERATED REACTORS
HELIUM COOLED REACTORS
HTGR TYPE REACTORS
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
POWER PLANTS
POWER REACTORS
PWR TYPE REACTORS
REACTORS
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
THERMAL REACTORS
US ORGANIZATIONS
WATER COOLED REACTORS
WATER MODERATED REACTORS
220900* - Nuclear Reactor Technology- Reactor Safety