skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Endovascular Treatment of Epistaxis: Indications, Management, and Outcome

Journal Article · · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
 [1];  [2]; ; ; ; ;  [1]; ; ;  [2]; ;  [1]
  1. University of Bonn, Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology (Germany)
  2. University of Bonn, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (Germany)

Objective: Epistaxis is a common clinical problem, and the majority of bleedings can be managed conservatively. However, due to extensive and sometimes life-threatening bleeding, further treatment, such as superselective embolization, may be required. We report our experience with endovascular treatment of life-threatening epistaxis. Methods: All patients presenting with excessive epistaxis, which received endovascular treatment at a German tertiary care facility between January 2001 and December 2009, were retrospectively identified. Demographic data, etiology, origin and clinical relevance of bleeding, interventional approach, therapy-associated complications, and outcome were assessed. Results: A total of 48 patients required 53 embolizations. Depending on the etiology of bleeding, patients were assigned to three groups: 1) idiopathic epistaxis (31/48), 2) traumatic or iatrogenic epistaxis (12/48), and 3) hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) (5/48). Eleven of 48 patients required blood transfusions, and 9 of these 11 patients (82%) were termed clinically unstable. The sphenopalatine artery was embolized unilaterally in 10 of 53 (18.9%) and bilaterally in 41 of 53 (77.4%) procedures. During the same procedure, additional vessels were embolized in three patients (3/53; 5.7%). In 2 of 53(3.8%) cases, the internal carotid artery (ICA) was occluded. Long-term success rates of embolization were 29 of 31 (93.5%) for group 1 and 11 of 12 (91.7%) for group 2 patients. Embolization of patients with HHT offered at least a temporary relief in three of five (60%) cases. Two major complications (necrosis of nasal tip and transient hemiparesis) occurred after embolization. Conclusions: Endovascular treatment proves to be effective for prolonged and life-threatening epistaxis. It is easily repeatable if the first procedure is not successful and offers a good risk-benefit profile.

OSTI ID:
21608660
Journal Information:
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 34, Issue 6; Other Information: DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0155-5; Copyright (c) 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE); Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0174-1551
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Microcatheter Embolization of Intractable Idiopathic Epistaxis
Journal Article · Mon Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 1999 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608660

Accessory Meningeal Arterial Supply to the Posterior Nasal Cavity: Another Reason for Failed Endovascular Treatment of Epistaxis
Journal Article · Mon Sep 15 00:00:00 EDT 2003 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608660

Radiological Diagnosis and Management of Epistaxis
Journal Article · Fri Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2013 · Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology · OSTI ID:21608660