skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: SECONDARY ECLIPSE PHOTOMETRY OF WASP-4b WITH WARM SPITZER

Journal Article · · Astrophysical Journal
;  [1];  [2]; ;  [3]; ;  [4]; ;  [5];  [6];  [7]; ;  [8]
  1. Department of Astronomy, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 (United States)
  2. Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 05844 (United States)
  3. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 (United States)
  4. Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195 (United States)
  5. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA 02138 (United States)
  6. Planetary Systems Laboratory, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt MD 20771 (United States)
  7. Department of Physics, Principia College, Elsah, IL 62028 (United States)
  8. Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 (United States)

We present photometry of the giant extrasolar planet WASP-4b at 3.6 and 4.5 {mu}m taken with the Infrared Array Camera on board the Spitzer Space Telescope as part of Spitzer's extended warm mission. We find secondary eclipse depths of 0.319% {+-} 0.031% and 0.343% {+-} 0.027% for the 3.6 and 4.5 {mu}m bands, respectively, and show model emission spectra and pressure-temperature profiles for the planetary atmosphere. These eclipse depths are well fit by model emission spectra with water and other molecules in absorption, similar to those used for TrES-3 and HD 189733b. Depending on our choice of model, these results indicate that this planet has either a weak dayside temperature inversion or no inversion at all. The absence of a strong thermal inversion on this highly irradiated planet is contrary to the idea that highly irradiated planets are expected to have inversions, perhaps due the presence of an unknown absorber in the upper atmosphere. This result might be explained by the modestly enhanced activity level of WASP-4b's G7V host star, which could increase the amount of UV flux received by the planet, therefore reducing the abundance of the unknown stratospheric absorber in the planetary atmosphere as suggested in Knutson et al. We also find no evidence for an offset in the timing of the secondary eclipse and place a 2{sigma} upper limit on |ecos {omega}| of 0.0024, which constrains the range of tidal heating models that could explain this planet's inflated radius.

OSTI ID:
21567618
Journal Information:
Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 727, Issue 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/727/1/23; ISSN 0004-637X
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English