Benchmarking performance: Environmental impact statements in Egypt

Journal Article · Fri Apr 15 00:00:00 EDT 2011 · Environmental Impact Assessment Review

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.10.004· OSTI ID:21499674

Cashmore, Matthew ^[1]

---

1. InteREAM, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7TJ (United Kingdom)

Environmental impact assessment (EIA) was formally introduced in Egypt in 1994. This short paper evaluates 'how well' the EIA process is working in practice in Egypt, by reviewing the quality of 45 environmental impact statements (EISs) produced between 2000 and 2007 for a variety of project types. The Lee and Colley review package was used to assess the quality of the selected EISs. About 69% of the EISs sampled were found to be of a satisfactory quality. An assessment of the performance of different elements of the EIA process indicates that descriptive tasks tend to be performed better than scientific tasks. The quality of core elements of EIA (e.g., impact prediction, significance evaluation, scoping and consideration of alternatives) appears to be particularly problematic. Variables that influence the quality of EISs are identified and a number of broad recommendations are made for improving the effectiveness of the EIA system.

• OSTI ID: 21499674
• Journal Information: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 31, Issue 3; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.10.004; PII: S0195-9255(10)00144-7; Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0195-9255
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
EGYPTIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
EVALUATION
FORECASTING
PERFORMANCE
QUALITY CONTROL
RECOMMENDATIONS
RESOURCE ASSESSMENT
AFRICA
ARAB COUNTRIES
CONTROL
DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
DOCUMENT TYPES
MIDDLE EAST
PUBLIC OPINION