{sup 18}F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Radiotherapy Target Volume Definition in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Delineation by Radiation Oncologists vs. Joint Outlining With a PET Radiologist?
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, N. Ireland (United Kingdom)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, N. Ireland (United Kingdom)
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, N. Ireland (United Kingdom)
- Northern Ireland Regional Medical Physics Agency, Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, N. Ireland (United Kingdom)
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, N. Ireland (United Kingdom)
Purpose: {sup 18}F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has benefits in target volume (TV) definition in radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, an optimal protocol for TV delineation has not been determined. We investigate volumetric and positional variation in gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation using a planning PET/CT among three radiation oncologists and a PET radiologist. Methods and Materials: RTP PET/CT scans were performed on 28 NSCLC patients (Stage IA-IIIB) of which 14 patients received prior induction chemotherapy. Three radiation oncologists and one PET radiologist working with a fourth radiation oncologist independently delineated the GTV on CT alone (GTV{sub CT}) and on fused PET/CT images (GTV{sub PETCT}). The mean percentage volume change (PVC) between GTV{sub CT} and GTV{sub PETCT} for the radiation oncologists and the PVC between GTV{sub CT} and GTV{sub PETCT} for the PET radiologist were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Concordance index (CI) was used to assess both positional and volume change between GTV{sub CT} and GTV{sub PETCT} in a single measurement. Results: For all patients, a significant difference in PVC from GTV{sub CT} to GTV{sub PETCT} exists between the radiation oncologist (median, 5.9%), and the PET radiologist (median, -0.4%, p = 0.001). However, no significant difference in median concordance index (comparing GTV{sub CT} and GTV{sub FUSED} for individual cases) was observed (PET radiologist = 0.73; radiation oncologists = 0.66; p = 0.088). Conclusions: Percentage volume changes from GTV{sub CT} to GTV{sub PETCT} were lower for the PET radiologist than for the radiation oncologists, suggesting a lower impact of PET/CT in TV delineation for the PET radiologist than for the oncologists. Guidelines are needed to standardize the use of PET/CT for TV delineation in RTP.
- OSTI ID:
- 21438039
- Journal Information:
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 78, Issue 4; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.060; PII: S0360-3016(09)03395-1; Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved.; ISSN 0360-3016
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Reproducibility of 'Intelligent' Contouring of Gross Tumor Volume in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer on PET/CT Images Using a Standardized Visual Method
Target Volume Delineation in Oropharyngeal Cancer: Impact of PET, MRI, and Physical Examination
Related Subjects
CAT SCANNING
FLUORINE 18
FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE
LUNGS
NEOPLASMS
PLANNING
POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
RADIOLOGICAL PERSONNEL
RADIOTHERAPY
ANTIMETABOLITES
BETA DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
BETA-PLUS DECAY RADIOISOTOPES
BODY
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES
DISEASES
DRUGS
EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
FLUORINE ISOTOPES
HOURS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
ISOMERIC TRANSITION ISOTOPES
ISOTOPES
LIGHT NUCLEI
MEDICAL PERSONNEL
MEDICINE
NANOSECONDS LIVING RADIOISOTOPES
NUCLEAR MEDICINE
NUCLEI
ODD-ODD NUCLEI
ORGANS
PERSONNEL
RADIOISOTOPES
RADIOLOGY
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
THERAPY
TOMOGRAPHY