skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Large Cohort Dose-Volume Response Analysis of Parotid Gland Function After Radiotherapy: Intensity-Modulated Versus Conventional Radiotherapy

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1]; ; ;  [1];  [2]; ;  [1]
  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (Netherlands)
  2. Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht (Netherlands)

Purpose: To compare parotid gland dose-volume response relationships in a large cohort of patients treated with intensity-modulated (IMRT) and conventional radiotherapy (CRT). Methods and materials: A total of 221 patients (64 treated with IMRT, 157 with CRT) with various head-and-neck malignancies were prospectively evaluated. The distribution of tumor subsites in both groups was unbalanced. Stimulated parotid flow rates were measured before and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after radiotherapy. Parotid gland dose-volume histograms were derived from computed tomography-based treatment planning. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model proposed by Lyman was fit to the data. A complication was defined as stimulated parotid flow ratio <25% of the pretreatment flow rate. The relative risk of complications was determined for IMRT vs. CRT and adjusted for the mean parotid gland dose using Poisson regression modeling. Results: One year after radiotherapy, NTCP curves for IMRT and CRT were comparable with a TD{sub 50} (uniform dose leading to a 50% complication probability) of 38 and 40 Gy, respectively. Until 6 months after RT, corrected for mean dose, different complication probabilities existed for IMRT vs. CRT. The relative risk of a complication for IMRT vs. CRT after 6 weeks was 1.42 (95% CI 1.21-1.67), after 6 months 1.41 (95% CI; 1.12-1.77), and at 1 year 1.21 (95% CI 0.87-1.68), after correcting for mean dose. Conclusions: One year after radiotherapy, no difference existed in the mean dose-based NTCP curves for IMRT and CRT. Early after radiotherapy (up to 6 months) mean dose based (Lyman) models failed to fully describe the effects of radiotherapy on the parotid glands.

OSTI ID:
21172462
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 72, Issue 4; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.059; PII: S0360-3016(08)00404-5; Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Long-term parotid gland function after radiotherapy
Journal Article · Fri Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2005 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21172462

Parotid Gland Function After Radiotherapy: The Combined Michigan and Utrecht Experience
Journal Article · Fri Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2010 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21172462

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly reduces xerostomia compared with conventional radiotherapy
Journal Article · Wed Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2006 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:21172462