skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Radiation planning comparison for superficial tissue avoidance in radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the lower extremity

Journal Article · · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [4];  [4];  [5];  [5];  [5]
  1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  2. Department of Radiation Therapy, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  3. Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  4. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Musculoskeletal Oncology Unit, Mount Sinai Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Canada)
  5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Canada)

Purpose: Three types of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) plans for extremity soft tissue sarcoma were compared to determine the amount of dose reduction possible to the planned surgical skin flaps required for tumor resection and wound closure, without compromising target coverage. Methods and Materials: Twenty-four untreated patients with large, deep, lower extremity STS treated with preoperative RT and limb salvage surgery had their original conventional treatment plans re-created. The same clinical target volume was used for all three plans. The future surgical skin flaps were created virtually through contouring by the treating surgeon and regarded as an organ at risk. The original, conformal, and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) plans were created to deliver 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the clinical target volume. Clinical target volume and organ-at-risk dose-volume histograms were calculated and the plans compared for conformality, target coverage, and dose sparing. Results: The mean dose to the planned skin flaps was 42.62 Gy (range, 30.24-48.65 Gy) for the original plans compared with 40.12 Gy (range, 24.24-47.26 Gy) for the conformal plans and 26.71 Gy (range, 22.31-31.91 Gy) for the IMRT plans (p = 0.0008). An average of 86.4% (range, 53.2-97.4%) of the planned skin flaps received {>=}30 Gy in the original plans compared with 83.4% (range, 36.2-96.2%) in the conformal plans and only 34.0% (range, 22.5-53.3%) in the IMRT plans (p = 0.0001). IMRT improved target conformality compared with the original and conformal plans (1.27, 2.34, and 1.76, respectively, p = 0.0001). Conclusion: In a retrospective review, preoperative IMRT substantially lowered the dose to the future surgical skin flaps, sparing a greater percentage of this structure's volume without compromising target (tumor) coverage.

OSTI ID:
20944738
Journal Information:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics, Vol. 67, Issue 3; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.09.048; PII: S0360-3016(06)03223-8; Copyright (c) 2007 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 0360-3016
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: An IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors
Journal Article · Mon Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2005 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20944738

Proton Radiotherapy for High-Risk Pediatric Neuroblastoma: Early Outcomes and Dose Comparison
Journal Article · Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20944738

Intensity modulated radiation-therapy for preoperative posterior abdominal wall irradiation of retroperitoneal liposarcomas
Journal Article · Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2007 · International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics · OSTI ID:20944738