Field assessments in conjunction with whole effluent toxicity testing
Whole effluent toxicity (WET) tests are widely used to assess potential effects of wastewater discharges on aquatic life. This paper represents a summary of chapters in a 1996 Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry-sponsored workshop and a literature review concerning linkages between WET testing and associated field biomonitoring. Most published studies thus far focus primarily on benthic macroinvertebrates and on effluent-dominated stream systems in which effluents demonstrate little or no significant acute toxicity. Fewer studies examine WET test predictability in other aquatic ecosystems (e.g., wetlands, estuaries, large rivers) or deal with instream biota such as fish and primary producers. Published results indicate that standards for the usual WET freshwater test species, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas, may not always protect most of the species inhabiting a receiving stream. Although WET tests are useful in predicting aquatic individual responses, they are not meant to directly measure natural population or community responses. Further, they do not address bioconcentration or bioaccumulation of hydrophobic compounds; do not assess eutrophication effects in receiving systems; and lastly, do not reflect genotoxic effects or function to test for endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Consequently, a more direct evaluation of ecosystem health, using bioassessment techniques, may be needed to properly evaluate aquatic systems affected by wastewater discharges.
- Research Organization:
- Univ. of North Texas, Denton, TX (US)
- OSTI ID:
- 20075729
- Journal Information:
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 19, Issue 1; Other Information: PBD: Jan 2000; ISSN 0730-7268
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Tennessee's East Fork Poplar Creek: A biological monitoring and abatement program
What is the relationship between whole effluent toxicity and instream biological condition?