A comparison of battery testing protocols: Those used by the U.S. advanced battery consortium and those used in China
Two testing protocols, QC/T 743 and those used by the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC), were compared using cells based on LiFePO4/graphite chemistry. Differences in the protocols directly affected the data and the performance decline mechanisms deduced from the data. A change in capacity fade mechanism from linear-with-time to t1/2 was observed when the power density measurement was included in the QC/T 743 testing. The rate of resistance increase was linear with time using both protocols. Overall, the testing protocols produced very similar data when the testing conditions and metrics used to define performance were similar. The choice of depth of discharge and pulse width had a direct effect on estimated cell life. At greater percent depth of discharge (%DOD) and pulse width, the estimated life was shorter that at lower %DOD and shorter pulse width. This indicates that cells which were at the end of life based on the USABC protocol were not at end of life based on the QC/T 743 protocol by a large margin.
- Research Organization:
- Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Vehicle Technologies Office (EE-3V)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC02-06CH11357
- OSTI ID:
- 1391635
- Journal Information:
- Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 306, Issue C; ISSN 0378-7753
- Publisher:
- Elsevier
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Cycle life testing of lithium-ion batteries for small satellite LEO space missions
ANL's electric vehicle battery activities for USABC. [US Advanced Battery Consortium (USABC)]