Toward Reconciling Magnitude Discrepancies Estimated from Paleoearthquake Data
We recognize a discrepancy in magnitudes estimated for several Basin and Range, U.S.A. faults. For example, magnitudes predicted for the Wasatch (Utah), Lost River (Idaho), and Lemhi (Idaho) faults from fault segment lengths (L{sub seg}) where lengths are defined between geometrical, structural, and/or behavioral discontinuities assumed to persistently arrest rupture, are consistently less than magnitudes calculated from displacements (D) along these same segments. For self-similarity, empirical relationships (e.g. Wells and Coppersmith, 1994) should predict consistent magnitudes (M) using diverse fault dimension values for a given fault (i.e. M {approx} L{sub seg}, should equal M {approx} D). Typically, the empirical relationships are derived from historical earthquake data and parameter values used as input into these relationships are determined from field investigations of paleoearthquakes. A commonly used assumption - grounded in the characteristic-earthquake model of Schwartz and Coppersmith (1984) - is equating L{sub seg} with surface rupture length (SRL). Many large historical events yielded secondary and/or sympathetic faulting (e.g. 1983 Borah Peak, Idaho earthquake) which are included in the measurement of SRL and used to derive empirical relationships. Therefore, calculating magnitude from the M {approx} SRL relationship using L{sub seg} as SRL leads to an underestimation of magnitude and the M {approx} L{sub seg} and M {approx} D discrepancy. Here, we propose an alternative approach to earthquake magnitude estimation involving a relationship between moment magnitude (Mw) and length, where length is L{sub seg} instead of SRL. We analyze seven historical, surface-rupturing, strike-slip and normal faulting earthquakes for which segmentation of the causative fault and displacement data are available and whose rupture included at least one entire fault segment, but not two or more. The preliminary Mw {approx} L{sub seg} results are strikingly consistent with Mw {approx} D calculations using paleoearthquake data for the Wasatch, Lost River, and Lemhi faults, demonstrating self-similarity and implying that the Mw {approx} L{sub seg} relationship should supplant M {approx} SRL relationships currently employed in seismic hazard analyses. The relationship will permit reliable use of L{sub seg} data from field investigations and proper use and weighting of multiple-segment-rupture scenarios in seismic hazard analyses, and eliminate the need to reconcile the Mw {approx} SRL and Mw {approx} D differences in a multiple-parameter relationship for segmented faults.
- Research Organization:
- Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE
- DOE Contract Number:
- DE-AC07-05ID14517
- OSTI ID:
- 1040594
- Report Number(s):
- INL/JOU-11-23246; TRN: US201210%%764
- Journal Information:
- Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 83, Issue 3; ISSN 0895-0695
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Summary of Holocene surface faulting and fault segmentation, Wasatch fault zone, Utah
Seismic hazards astride the boundary between the eastern Snake River Plain and northern Basin and Range Province Idaho