DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
  1. Enabling bifacial thin film devices by developing a back surface field using CuxAlOy

    Bifacial solar cells have the potential to increase the energy yield per unit area over traditional monofacial devices without significant added cost, driving $/kWh costs lower and accelerating the adoption of solar photovoltaics. However, the performance of bifacial thin film solar cells significantly lags that achieved by crystalline silicon cells. Here we incorporate wide bandgap CuxAlOy as a back buffer layer for CdTe devices and achieve a backside illuminated device with high current density and high fill factor. Moreover, these values remain nearly constant even as the absorber layer thickness changes, indicating that a fully-depleted device is not required formore » efficient charge collection. We show that this response is indicative of a back surface field, albeit with a persistent high back surface recombination velocity. By managing electron reflection, we achieved a backside illumination conversion efficiency of 7.1% and bifaciality of 0.55 for a 3.3 µm CdTe device and 8.0% and 0.62 for a 2 µm device. Future improvements can be made by identifying and incorporating a passivation material that reduces the back surface recombination velocity.« less
  2. Measured and satellite-derived albedo data for estimating bifacial photovoltaic system performance

    The albedo of the ground surface is an important factor in the cost-effectiveness of a bifacial photovoltaic (PV) system. To improve the availability of reliable albedo data, datasets of ground albedo and associated meteorological data were developed by using existing measurement network data and data measured by the PV industry. The measured datasets include time-series data as well as summary information of tabular monthly and yearly data and plots of monthly and hourly albedo values. Satellite-derived values of albedo are available from the National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB). The NSRDB albedos were compared to the measured albedos for Surfacemore » Radiation budget (SURFRAD) network locations for the period 2001–2017, and the mean bias difference results were from -0.044 to +0.056. Overall, these differences are greater than the albedo measurement uncertainty of ±0.02; consequently, the NSRDB albedos should be used with caution for estimating the performance of bifacial PV systems. Differences between SURFRAD and NSRDB albedos are attributed to the NSRDB method for determining albedo and to the ground surfaces within the NSRDB 4 km spatial resolution pixel consisting of a mixture of surface types rather than just the single surface types viewed by the albedometers at the SURFRAD stations.« less
  3. Modeling Spectrally-Selective Reflection for Thermal Management in Monofacial and Bifacial Modules

    Parasitic absorption in photovoltaic modules is a major source of waste heat, which drives operating temperatures 20-30K above ambient. Spectrally-selective sub-bandgap reflection can reduce parasitic absorption, thereby improving module efficiency and power output. In this paper, we investigate the performance of 1-D spectrally-selective mirrors in monofacial Al BSF and PERC modules, and bifacial PERC modules. In monofacial modules, these mirrors offer >1.2% increase in energy yield compared to single-layer anti-reflection coatings, while cooling by over 1K on average. Mirrors reduced bifacial module parasitic absorption by up to 34 W/m2 out of 1240 W/m2 incident.
  4. Understanding and Advancing Bifacial Thin Film Solar Cells

  5. Ground sculpting to enhance energy yield of vertical bifacial solar farms

    The prospect of additional energy yield and improved reliability have increased commercial interest in bifacial solar modules. Recent publications have quantified the bifacial gain for several configurations. For example, a standalone, optimally-tilted bifacial panel placed over a flat ground (with 50% albedo) is expected to produce a bifacial energy gain of 30% (per module area). In contrast, self and mutual shading in a farm with periodically spaced panels reduces the bifacial gain to 10–15% (per farm area). Bifacial gain is negligible for vertical arrays—although the configuration is of significant interest since it can prevent soiling. Here, we calculate the bifacialmore » gain of a solar farm where vertical arrays are placed over sculpted/patterned ground. We conclude that vertical panels straddling (upward) triangle-shaped ground maximizes the energy output. Our worldwide calculation with up-triangle ground configuration and 50% albedo leads to the following conclusion. Compared to a traditional tilted monofacial design, the bifacial gain is (i) small up to 20° latitude, (ii) increases to 50% at 40° latitude, and (iii) reaches up to 100% at 60° latitude. Overall, high bifacial gains are observed in many regions particularly those with moderate to low clearness index. The enhanced output, along with reduced soiling loss and lower cleaning cost of the ground sculpted vertical bifacial (GvBF) solar farm could be of significant technological interest, especially in regions such as the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) susceptible to significant soiling losses.« less
...

Search for:
All Records
Subject
bifacial

Refine by:
Article Type
Availability
Journal
Creator / Author
Publication Date
Research Organization