Survival and behavior of Mojave desert tortoises head-started with and without outdoor rearing

Journal Article · Tue Feb 20 00:00:00 UTC 2024 · Journal of Wildlife Management

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22562 · OSTI ID:2350791

Glass, M. Susanna ^[1]; Todd, Brian D. ^[2]; Buhlmann, Kurt A. ^[3]; Rushing, Clark S. ^[4]; Tuberville, Tracey D.  ^[3]

---

1. Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL); Savannah River Ecology Laboratory - University of Georgia
2. Univ. of California, Davis, CA (United States)
3. Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL)
4. Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)

Mojave desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) populations in some regions have declined by >50% since 2004, prompting the need for more research on ways to recover populations. One possible recovery tool is head-starting (i.e., the act of protecting and raising juvenile tortoises to sizes that increase survival upon release); however, head-starting can have high start-up and maintenance costs that can limit its feasibility. Strategies that reduce cost and rearing duration may foster broader and more effective use. We released and radio-tracked 60 juvenile tortoises in the Mojave National Preserve in California, USA, that had been reared under 2 treatments: those reared 1 year indoors after hatching, then 1 year outdoors (combo) and those reared just 1 year indoors (indoor-only). We tested whether indoor-only rearing alone could be a more efficient means of producing robust head-started tortoises. We examined the behavior, movement, and survival of tortoises after release into the wild from 2020 to 2021 to determine whether these outcomes differed between husbandry treatments. Combo tortoises tended to perform settling behaviors (mean ± 1 SE days to building first burrow = 6.7 ± 0.8, entering dormancy = 23.3 ± 2.1, and emerging from dormancy = 189.6 ± 4.4) earlier than indoor-only tortoises (7.4 ± 0.9, 31.5 ± 2.6, and 193.9 ± 5.9, respectively), but this difference was not significant, suggesting the rearing method did not greatly alter settling behavior. Indoor-only tortoises dispersed at least twice as far from their release site (156.2 ± 26.3 m compared with 77.3 ± 20.6 m for combo tortoises), had larger mean use areas (3.7 ± 0.1 ha compared with 2.8 ± 0.3 ha for combo tortoises for 95% Brownian bridge movement model estimates), and greater variability in their movements than combo tortoises (daily average step length post-emergence: 4.3 ± 0.2 m compared with 2.8 ± 0.1 m for combo tortoises). Despite differences in their movements, indoor-only and combo tortoises had similar survival rates over the study, 51% versus 42%, respectively, during a period of extreme drought in 2021. The similarity in survival between groups gives head-starting practitioners freedom in their rearing methods. The indoor-only group had lower site fidelity, which should be considered when this is an undesirable trait for released tortoises.

• Research Organization: Savannah River Site (SRS), Aiken, SC (United States). Savannah River Ecology Laboratory (SREL)
• Sponsoring Organization: USDOE Office of Environmental Management (EM)
• Grant/Contract Number: EM0005228
• OSTI ID: 2350791
• Journal Information: Journal of Wildlife Management, Journal Name: Journal of Wildlife Management Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 88; ISSN 0022-541X
• Publisher: WileyCopyright Statement
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English