DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Cost‐benefit assessment framework for robotics‐driven inspection of floating offshore wind farms

Abstract

Abstract Operations and maintenance (O&M) of floating offshore wind farms (FOWFs) poses various challenges in terms of greater distances from the shore, harsher weather conditions, and restricted mobility options. Robotic systems have the potential to automate some parts of the O&M leading to continuous feature‐rich data acquisition, operational efficiency, along with health and safety improvements. There remains a gap in assessing the techno‐economic feasibility of robotics in the FOWF sector. This paper investigates the costs and benefits of incorporating robotics into the O&M of a FOWF. A bottom‐up cost model is used to estimate the costs for a proposed multi‐robot platform (MRP). The MRP houses unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and remotely operated vehicle (ROV) to conduct the inspection of specific FOWF components. Emphasis is laid on the most conducive O&M activities for robotization and the associated technical and cost aspects. The simulation is conducted in Windfarm Operations and Maintenance cost‐Benefit Analysis Tool (WOMBAT), where the metrics of incurred operational expenditure (OPEX) and the inspection time are calculated and compared with those of a baseline case consisting of crew transfer vessels, rope‐access technicians, and divers. Results show that the MRP can reduce the inspection time incurred, but this reduction has dependencymore » on the efficacy of the robotic system and the associated parameterization e.g., cost elements and the inspection rates. Conversely, the increased MRP day rate results in a higher annualized OPEX. Residual risk is calculated to assess the net benefit of incorporating the MRP. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is conducted to find the key parameters influencing the OPEX and the inspection time variation. A key output of this work is a robust and realistic framework which can be used for the cost‐benefit assessment of future MRP systems for specific FOWF activities.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [6]
  1. MaREI Centre, Environmental Research Institute University College Cork Cork Ireland, School of Engineering and Architecture‐Electrical and Electronic Engineering University College Cork Cork Ireland, Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult Glasgow UK
  2. School of Engineering and Architecture‐Electrical and Electronic Engineering University College Cork Cork Ireland
  3. Offshore Renewable Energy Catapult Glasgow UK
  4. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Golden Colorado USA
  5. MaREI Centre, Environmental Research Institute University College Cork Cork Ireland
  6. Gavin and Doherty Geosolutions Dublin Ireland
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Wind Energy Technologies Office; European Union's Horizon 2020
OSTI Identifier:
2221876
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 2222833; OSTI ID: 2229073
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5000-86662
Journal ID: ISSN 1095-4244
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308; 860737
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Wind Energy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Wind Energy Journal Volume: 27 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 1095-4244
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
17 WIND ENERGY; cost estimation; floating offshore wind farm; operations and maintenance; robotics; WOMBAT

Citation Formats

Khalid, Omer, Hao, Guangbo, MacDonald, Hamish, Cooperman, Aubryn, Devoy McAuliffe, Fiona, and Desmond, Cian. Cost‐benefit assessment framework for robotics‐driven inspection of floating offshore wind farms. United Kingdom: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.1002/we.2881.
Khalid, Omer, Hao, Guangbo, MacDonald, Hamish, Cooperman, Aubryn, Devoy McAuliffe, Fiona, & Desmond, Cian. Cost‐benefit assessment framework for robotics‐driven inspection of floating offshore wind farms. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2881
Khalid, Omer, Hao, Guangbo, MacDonald, Hamish, Cooperman, Aubryn, Devoy McAuliffe, Fiona, and Desmond, Cian. Thu . "Cost‐benefit assessment framework for robotics‐driven inspection of floating offshore wind farms". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2881.
@article{osti_2221876,
title = {Cost‐benefit assessment framework for robotics‐driven inspection of floating offshore wind farms},
author = {Khalid, Omer and Hao, Guangbo and MacDonald, Hamish and Cooperman, Aubryn and Devoy McAuliffe, Fiona and Desmond, Cian},
abstractNote = {Abstract Operations and maintenance (O&M) of floating offshore wind farms (FOWFs) poses various challenges in terms of greater distances from the shore, harsher weather conditions, and restricted mobility options. Robotic systems have the potential to automate some parts of the O&M leading to continuous feature‐rich data acquisition, operational efficiency, along with health and safety improvements. There remains a gap in assessing the techno‐economic feasibility of robotics in the FOWF sector. This paper investigates the costs and benefits of incorporating robotics into the O&M of a FOWF. A bottom‐up cost model is used to estimate the costs for a proposed multi‐robot platform (MRP). The MRP houses unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and remotely operated vehicle (ROV) to conduct the inspection of specific FOWF components. Emphasis is laid on the most conducive O&M activities for robotization and the associated technical and cost aspects. The simulation is conducted in Windfarm Operations and Maintenance cost‐Benefit Analysis Tool (WOMBAT), where the metrics of incurred operational expenditure (OPEX) and the inspection time are calculated and compared with those of a baseline case consisting of crew transfer vessels, rope‐access technicians, and divers. Results show that the MRP can reduce the inspection time incurred, but this reduction has dependency on the efficacy of the robotic system and the associated parameterization e.g., cost elements and the inspection rates. Conversely, the increased MRP day rate results in a higher annualized OPEX. Residual risk is calculated to assess the net benefit of incorporating the MRP. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is conducted to find the key parameters influencing the OPEX and the inspection time variation. A key output of this work is a robust and realistic framework which can be used for the cost‐benefit assessment of future MRP systems for specific FOWF activities.},
doi = {10.1002/we.2881},
journal = {Wind Energy},
number = 2,
volume = 27,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Thu Nov 23 00:00:00 EST 2023},
month = {Thu Nov 23 00:00:00 EST 2023}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2881

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Cost-benefit Evaluation of Remote Inspection of Offshore Wind Farms by Simulating the Operation and Maintenance Phase
journal, January 2014


Placement and Routing Optimization for Automated Inspection With Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A Study in Offshore Wind Farm
journal, May 2021

  • Chung, Hwei-Ming; Maharjan, Sabita; Zhang, Yan
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, Vol. 17, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1109/TII.2020.3004816

Enhancing the Scientific Value of Industry Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) in Our Oceans
journal, April 2020

  • McLean, Dianne L.; Parsons, Miles J. G.; Gates, Andrew R.
  • Frontiers in Marine Science, Vol. 7
  • DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00220

Applications of robotics in floating offshore wind farm operations and maintenance: Literature review and trends
journal, July 2022

  • Khalid, Omer; Hao, Guangbo; Desmond, Cian
  • Wind Energy, Vol. 25, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/we.2773

A review: Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence and robotics in the offshore wind sector
journal, May 2022


O&M modeling of offshore wind farms — State of the art and future developments
conference, January 2016

  • Asgarpour, Masoud; Dalsgaard Sorensen, John
  • 2016 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)
  • DOI: 10.1109/RAMS.2016.7448057

The ERA5 global reanalysis
journal, June 2020

  • Hersbach, Hans; Bell, Bill; Berrisford, Paul
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 146, Issue 730
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.3803

Non-contact vibration monitoring of rotating wind turbines using a semi-autonomous UAV
journal, April 2020


A lifecycle techno-economic model of offshore wind energy for different entry and exit instances
journal, July 2018


Application of robotics in offshore oil and gas industry— A review Part II
journal, January 2016


Emerging Inspection Technologies – Enabling Remote Surveys/Inspections
conference, April 2019

  • Wen, Feng; Pray, Julie; McSweeney, Kevin
  • Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019
  • DOI: 10.4043/29450-MS

Testing the robustness of optimal access vessel fleet selection for operation and maintenance of offshore wind farms
journal, November 2017


Collaborative Unmanned Vehicles for Inspection, Maintenance, and Repairs of Offshore Wind Turbines
journal, May 2022


ROV launch and recovery from an unmanned autonomous surface vessel – Hydrodynamic modelling and system integration
journal, July 2021


Emergence of floating offshore wind energy: Technology and industry
journal, January 2019


Application of robotics in onshore oil and gas industry—A review Part I
journal, January 2016


Estimating the impact of drone-based inspection on the Levelised Cost of electricity for offshore wind farms
journal, March 2021


Survey on Autonomous Surface Vessels: Part I - A New Detailed Definition of Autonomy Levels
book, January 2017


Global growth in offshore wind turbine technology
journal, April 2022


Offshore renewable energy systems: Solutions for reduction in operational costs
conference, April 2017

  • Capocci, Romano; Dooly, Gerard; Toal, Daniel
  • 2017 Twelfth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER)
  • DOI: 10.1109/EVER.2017.7935940

The role of factor and activity-based models in offshore operating cost estimation
journal, March 2019


Climbing robots for maintenance and inspections of vertical structures—A survey of design aspects and technologies
journal, December 2013


Review of offshore wind farm cost components
journal, April 2017


Modeling offshore wind installation vessel day-rates in the United States
journal, May 2012

  • Kaiser, Mark J.; Snyder, Brian F.
  • Maritime Economics & Logistics, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1057/mel.2012.5

Current Status and Future Trends in the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review
journal, April 2021

  • Rinaldi, Giovanni; Thies, Philipp R.; Johanning, Lars
  • Energies, Vol. 14, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.3390/en14092484

Multicopter unmanned aerial vehicle for automated inspection of wind turbines
conference, June 2016

  • Schafer, Bjorn E.; Picchi, Davide; Engelhardt, Thomas
  • 2016 24th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED)
  • DOI: 10.1109/MED.2016.7536055