DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Evaluating 3 decades of precipitation in the Upper Colorado River basin from a high-resolution regional climate model

Abstract

Abstract. Convection-permitting regional climate models (RCMs) have recently become tractable for applications at multi-decadal timescales. These types of models have tremendous utility for water resource studies, but better characterization of precipitation biases is needed, particularly for water-resource-critical mountain regions, where precipitation is highly variable in space, observations are sparse, and the societal water need is great. This study examines 34 years (1987–2020) of RCM precipitation from the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF; v3.8.1), using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFS; CFSv2) initial and lateral boundary conditions and a 1 km × 1 km innermost grid spacing. The RCM is centered over the Upper Colorado River basin, with a focus on the high-elevation, 750 km2 East River watershed (ERW), where a variety of high-impact scientific activities are currently ongoing. Precipitation is compared against point observations (Natural Resources Conservation Service Snow Telemetry or SNOTEL), gridded climate datasets (Newman, Livneh, and PRISM), and Bayesian reconstructions of watershed mean precipitation conditioned on streamflow and high-resolution snow remote-sensing products. We find that the cool-season precipitation percent error between WRF and 23 SNOTEL gauges has a low overall bias (x^ = 0.25 %, s = 13.63 %) and that WRF has a higher percent error during the warm season (x^ = 10.37 %, s = 12.79 %). Warm-season bias manifests as a highmore » number of low-precipitation days, though the low-resolution or SNOTEL gauges limit some of the conclusions that can be drawn. Regional comparisons between WRF precipitation accumulation and three different gridded datasets show differences on the order of ± 20 %, particularly at the highest elevations and in keeping with findings from other studies. We find that WRF agrees slightly better with the Bayesian reconstruction of precipitation in the ERW compared to the gridded precipitation datasets, particularly when changing SNOTEL densities are taken into account. The conclusions are that the RCM reasonably captures orographic precipitation in this region and demonstrates that leveraging additional hydrologic information (streamflow and snow remote-sensing data) improves the ability to characterize biases in RCM precipitation fields. Error characteristics reported in this study are essential for leveraging the RCM model outputs for studies of past and future climates and water resource applications. The methods developed in this study can be applied to other watersheds and model configurations. Hourly 1 km × 1 km precipitation and other meteorological outputs from this dataset are publicly available and suitable for a wide variety of applications.« less

Authors:
; ORCiD logo;
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
OSTI Identifier:
2208870
Grant/Contract Number:  
DOE:DE-SC0019222
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Geoscientific Model Development (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Geoscientific Model Development (Online) Journal Volume: 16 Journal Issue: 22; Journal ID: ISSN 1991-9603
Publisher:
Copernicus GmbH
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Rudisill, William, Flores, Alejandro, and Carroll, Rosemary. Evaluating 3 decades of precipitation in the Upper Colorado River basin from a high-resolution regional climate model. Germany: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023.
Rudisill, William, Flores, Alejandro, & Carroll, Rosemary. Evaluating 3 decades of precipitation in the Upper Colorado River basin from a high-resolution regional climate model. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023
Rudisill, William, Flores, Alejandro, and Carroll, Rosemary. Wed . "Evaluating 3 decades of precipitation in the Upper Colorado River basin from a high-resolution regional climate model". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023.
@article{osti_2208870,
title = {Evaluating 3 decades of precipitation in the Upper Colorado River basin from a high-resolution regional climate model},
author = {Rudisill, William and Flores, Alejandro and Carroll, Rosemary},
abstractNote = {Abstract. Convection-permitting regional climate models (RCMs) have recently become tractable for applications at multi-decadal timescales. These types of models have tremendous utility for water resource studies, but better characterization of precipitation biases is needed, particularly for water-resource-critical mountain regions, where precipitation is highly variable in space, observations are sparse, and the societal water need is great. This study examines 34 years (1987–2020) of RCM precipitation from the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF; v3.8.1), using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFS; CFSv2) initial and lateral boundary conditions and a 1 km × 1 km innermost grid spacing. The RCM is centered over the Upper Colorado River basin, with a focus on the high-elevation, 750 km2 East River watershed (ERW), where a variety of high-impact scientific activities are currently ongoing. Precipitation is compared against point observations (Natural Resources Conservation Service Snow Telemetry or SNOTEL), gridded climate datasets (Newman, Livneh, and PRISM), and Bayesian reconstructions of watershed mean precipitation conditioned on streamflow and high-resolution snow remote-sensing products. We find that the cool-season precipitation percent error between WRF and 23 SNOTEL gauges has a low overall bias (x^ = 0.25 %, s = 13.63 %) and that WRF has a higher percent error during the warm season (x^ = 10.37 %, s = 12.79 %). Warm-season bias manifests as a high number of low-precipitation days, though the low-resolution or SNOTEL gauges limit some of the conclusions that can be drawn. Regional comparisons between WRF precipitation accumulation and three different gridded datasets show differences on the order of ± 20 %, particularly at the highest elevations and in keeping with findings from other studies. We find that WRF agrees slightly better with the Bayesian reconstruction of precipitation in the ERW compared to the gridded precipitation datasets, particularly when changing SNOTEL densities are taken into account. The conclusions are that the RCM reasonably captures orographic precipitation in this region and demonstrates that leveraging additional hydrologic information (streamflow and snow remote-sensing data) improves the ability to characterize biases in RCM precipitation fields. Error characteristics reported in this study are essential for leveraging the RCM model outputs for studies of past and future climates and water resource applications. The methods developed in this study can be applied to other watersheds and model configurations. Hourly 1 km × 1 km precipitation and other meteorological outputs from this dataset are publicly available and suitable for a wide variety of applications.},
doi = {10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023},
journal = {Geoscientific Model Development (Online)},
number = 22,
volume = 16,
place = {Germany},
year = {Wed Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2023},
month = {Wed Nov 15 00:00:00 EST 2023}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-6531-2023

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Combining snow, streamflow, and precipitation gauge observations to infer basin-mean precipitation: TUOLUMNE SNOW, STREAMFLOW, AND PRECIPITATION
journal, November 2016

  • Henn, Brian; Clark, Martyn P.; Kavetski, Dmitri
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 52, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018564

Independent Evaluation of Frozen Precipitation from WRF and PRISM in the Olympic Mountains
journal, October 2017

  • Currier, William Ryan; Thorson, Theodore; Lundquist, Jessica D.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 18, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-17-0026.1

Gridded Ensemble Precipitation and Temperature Estimates for the Contiguous United States
journal, November 2015

  • Newman, Andrew J.; Clark, Martyn P.; Craig, Jason
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 16, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0026.1

Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences
journal, November 1992


A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States: Update and Extensions
journal, December 2013


Inverse streamflow routing
journal, January 2013


Assessment of Spatiotemporal Variability of Evapotranspiration and Its Governing Factors in a Mountainous Watershed
journal, January 2019

  • Tran, Anh; Rungee, Joseph; Faybishenko, Boris
  • Water, Vol. 11, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.3390/w11020243

Scaling Precipitation Input to Spatially Distributed Hydrological Models by Measured Snow Distribution
journal, December 2016


A Comparison of Statistical and Dynamical Downscaling of Winter Precipitation over Complex Terrain
journal, January 2012

  • Gutmann, Ethan D.; Rasmussen, Roy M.; Liu, Changhai
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 25, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1175/2011JCLI4109.1

The twenty-first century Colorado River hot drought and implications for the future: COLORADO RIVER FLOW LOSS
journal, March 2017

  • Udall, Bradley; Overpeck, Jonathan
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 53, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016WR019638

Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization
journal, December 2008

  • Thompson, Gregory; Field, Paul R.; Rasmussen, Roy M.
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 136, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/2008MWR2387.1

Regional Snow Parameters Estimation for Large‐Domain Hydrological Applications in the Western United States
journal, May 2019

  • Sun, Ning; Yan, Hongxiang; Wigmosta, Mark S.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 124, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018JD030140

The Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Overview, System Efforts, and Future Directions
journal, August 2017

  • Powers, Jordan G.; Klemp, Joseph B.; Skamarock, William C.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 98, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00308.1

LiDAR measurement of seasonal snow accumulation along an elevation gradient in the southern Sierra Nevada, California
journal, October 2014

  • Kirchner, P. B.; Bales, R. C.; Molotch, N. P.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 18, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-18-4261-2014

Lidar measurement of snow depth: a review
journal, January 2013

  • Deems, Jeffrey S.; Painter, Thomas H.; Finnegan, David C.
  • Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 59, Issue 215
  • DOI: 10.3189/2013JoG12J154

Boundary condition and oceanic impacts on the atmospheric water balance in limited area climate model ensembles
journal, March 2021


Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration
journal, May 1961


WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas: NEW CLIMATE SURFACES FOR GLOBAL LAND AREAS
journal, May 2017

  • Fick, Stephen E.; Hijmans, Robert J.
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 37, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.5086

Gridded Ensemble Precipitation and Temperature Estimates over the Contiguous United States
dataset, January 2015

  • Rasmussen, Monaghan, A. J. , A. N. Newman, K. Ikeda, M. P. Clark, M. P. Barlage, L. Xue, J. R. Arnold, and R. M.
  • UCAR/NCAR - CISL - CDP
  • DOI: 10.5065/D6TH8JR2

Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling
journal, October 2009


The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements
journal, January 2011

  • Niu, Guo-Yue; Yang, Zong-Liang; Mitchell, Kenneth E.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116, Issue D12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JD015139

The 1990 Valentine's Day Arctic Outbreak. Part I: Mesoscale and Microscale Structure and Evolution of a Colorado Front Range Shallow Upslope Cloud
journal, July 1995

  • Rasmussen, Roy M.; Bernstein, Ben C.; Murakami, Masataka
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 34, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450-34.7.1481

Artificial amplification of warming trends across the mountains of the western United States
journal, January 2015

  • Oyler, Jared W.; Dobrowski, Solomon Z.; Ballantyne, Ashley P.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014GL062803

Efficiency of the Summer Monsoon in Generating Streamflow Within a Snow‐Dominated Headwater Basin of the Colorado River
journal, December 2020

  • Carroll, Rosemary W. H.; Gochis, David; Williams, Kenneth H.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020GL090856

Unravelling groundwater contributions to evapotranspiration and constraining water fluxes in a high‐elevation catchment
journal, January 2022

  • Ryken, Anna C.; Gochis, David; Maxwell, Reed M.
  • Hydrological Processes, Vol. 36, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14449

Hydrologically Aided Interpolation of Daily Precipitation and Temperature Fields in a Mesoscale Alpine Catchment
journal, November 2015

  • Le Moine, Nicolas; Hendrickx, Frédéric; Gailhard, Joël
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 16, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0162.1

The East River, Colorado, Watershed: A Mountainous Community Testbed for Improving Predictive Understanding of Multiscale Hydrological–Biogeochemical Dynamics
journal, January 2018

  • Hubbard, Susan S.; Williams, Kenneth Hurst; Agarwal, Deb
  • Vadose Zone Journal, Vol. 17, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2136/vzj2018.03.0061

Characterizing Biases in Mountain Snow Accumulation From Global Data Sets
journal, November 2019

  • Wrzesien, Melissa L.; Pavelsky, Tamlin M.; Durand, Michael T.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 55, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019WR025350

High-Resolution Coupled Climate Runoff Simulations of Seasonal Snowfall over Colorado: A Process Study of Current and Warmer Climate
journal, June 2011

  • Rasmussen, Roy; Liu, Changhai; Ikeda, Kyoko
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 24, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010JCLI3985.1

A low-to-no snow future and its impacts on water resources in the western United States
journal, October 2021

  • Siirila-Woodburn, Erica R.; Rhoades, Alan M.; Hatchett, Benjamin J.
  • Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, Vol. 2, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1038/s43017-021-00219-y

Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world
journal, April 2015

  • Working Group, Mountain Research Initiative EDW
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 5, p. 424-430
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2563

The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent and snow albedo
journal, October 2016

  • Painter, Thomas H.; Berisford, Daniel F.; Boardman, Joseph W.
  • Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 184
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.06.018

An assessment of differences in gridded precipitation datasets in complex terrain
journal, January 2018


A Meteorological Distribution System for High-Resolution Terrestrial Modeling (MicroMet)
journal, April 2006

  • Liston, Glen E.; Elder, Kelly
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1175/JHM486.1

PERSIANN-CDR: Daily Precipitation Climate Data Record from Multisatellite Observations for Hydrological and Climate Studies
journal, January 2015

  • Ashouri, Hamed; Hsu, Kuo-Lin; Sorooshian, Soroosh
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00068.1

Bayesian inference of uncertainties in precipitation‐streamflow modeling in a snow affected catchment
journal, November 2012

  • Koskela, J. J.; Croke, B. W. F.; Koivusalo, H.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 48, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011WR011773

Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States
journal, December 2008

  • Daly, Christopher; Halbleib, Michael; Smith, Joseph I.
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 28, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.1688

Continental-scale convection-permitting modeling of the current and future climate of North America
journal, August 2016


The Convective‐To‐Total Precipitation Ratio and the “Drizzling” Bias in Climate Models
journal, August 2021

  • Chen, Di; Dai, Aiguo; Hall, Alex
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 126, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020JD034198

The Changing Character of Precipitation
journal, September 2003

  • Trenberth, Kevin E.; Dai, Aiguo; Rasmussen, Roy M.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 84, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-84-9-1205

Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework
journal, January 2015

  • Raleigh, M. S.; Lundquist, J. D.; Clark, M. P.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 19, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015

The hazards of split-sample validation in hydrological model calibration
journal, November 2018


Weather Radar Coverage over the Contiguous United States
journal, August 2002


Dynamical downscaling improves upon gridded precipitation products in the Sierra Nevada, California
journal, April 2017


Inroads of remote sensing into hydrologic science during the WRR era: REMOTE SENSING
journal, September 2015

  • Lettenmaier, Dennis P.; Alsdorf, Doug; Dozier, Jeff
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017616

Precipitation Characteristics in Eighteen Coupled Climate Models
journal, September 2006


Supporting Advancement in Weather and Water Prediction in the Upper Colorado River Basin: The SPLASH Campaign
journal, October 2023

  • de Boer, Gijs; White, Allen; Cifelli, Rob
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 104, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0147.1

Sensitivity of meteorological-forcing resolution on hydrologic variables
journal, January 2020

  • Maina, Fadji Z.; Siirila-Woodburn, Erica R.; Vahmani, Pouya
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 24, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-24-3451-2020

The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis
journal, August 2010

  • Saha, Suranjana; Moorthi, Shrinivas; Pan, Hua-Lu
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 91, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1

Investigation of satellite-related precipitation products for modeling of rainfed wheat production systems
journal, December 2021


The Resolution Dependence of Explicitly Modeled Convective Systems
journal, April 1997


Characteristics of the western United States snowpack from snowpack telemetry (SNOTEL) data
journal, July 1999

  • Serreze, Mark C.; Clark, Martyn P.; Armstrong, Richard L.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 35, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/1999WR900090

Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYDROLOGICAL MODELS
journal, August 2008

  • Clark, Martyn P.; Slater, Andrew G.; Rupp, David E.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 44, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007WR006735

Simulation of seasonal snowfall over Colorado
journal, September 2010


Best practices for estimating near‐surface air temperature lapse rates
journal, June 2020

  • Lute, A. C.; Abatzoglou, John T.
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 41, Issue S1
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.6668

Probabilistic programming in Python using PyMC3
journal, January 2016

  • Salvatier, John; Wiecki, Thomas V.; Fonnesbeck, Christopher
  • PeerJ Computer Science, Vol. 2
  • DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.55

Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user
journal, January 2010

  • Maraun, D.; Wetterhall, F.; Ireson, A. M.
  • Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 48, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009RG000314

Estimating mountain basin‐mean precipitation from streamflow using B ayesian inference
journal, October 2015

  • Henn, Brian; Clark, Martyn P.; Kavetski, Dmitri
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014WR016736

Our Skill in Modeling Mountain Rain and Snow is Bypassing the Skill of Our Observational Networks
journal, December 2019

  • Lundquist, Jessica; Hughes, Mimi; Gutmann, Ethan
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 100, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0001.1

The NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2
journal, March 2014


Glaciers as a Proxy to Quantify the Spatial Distribution of Precipitation in the Hunza Basin
journal, February 2012

  • Immerzeel, Walter Willem; Pellicciotti, Francesca; Shrestha, Arun B.
  • Mountain Research and Development, Vol. 32, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00097.1

Rain or snow: hydrologic processes, observations, prediction, and research needs
journal, January 2017

  • Harpold, Adrian A.; Kaplan, Michael L.; Klos, P. Zion
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 21, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-1-2017

Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers
journal, December 2019