DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A high-resolution, 3D groundwater-surface water simulation of the contiguous US: Advances in the integrated ParFlow CONUS 2.0 modeling platform

Abstract

Large-scale, high-resolution hydrologic modeling is an important tool to address questions of water quantity, availability, and potential recharge. Continental-to-Global scale models, particularly those that include groundwater, are growing in number. However, many of these approaches simplify aspects of the system and the connections between surface water and groundwater. The ParFlow CONUS modeling platform is a large-scale, hyper-resolution, hydrologic model that relies on the integrated solution of 3D partial differential equations that describe groundwater, soil, and 2D surface water flow. The prior version, ParFlow CONUS 1.0, was the first large-scale hydrologic model that included an explicit treatment of lateral groundwater flow for the contiguous US (CONUS). Here, we present the ParFlow CONUS 2.0 integrated hydrologic model. This model extends to the coastlines and contributing basins for CONUS and is consistent with the NOAA National Water Model. Here we document the roughly five years of technical development of this platform, present steady-state simulation results, rigorously compare these results to the prior ParFlow CONUS 1.0 simulations and evaluate the model performance based on observations. Simulated water table depth and streamflow were evaluated using more than 635K observations from USGS monitoring wells, other compiled groundwater datasets, and NHD and USGS streamflow gauges. Our resultsmore » demonstrate improvement in both groundwater and surface water simulations over the prior generation model for all USGS Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) basins. These results suggest that this current generation hydrologic model has good to excellent streamflow performance over the entire CONUS, with almost half of the HUC subbasins exhibiting excellent performance based on normalized root-square error (RSR). These results suggest that the current generation model approaches good performance for water table depth over the CONUS, a metric not usually compared directly at all in large-scale studies, with good-to-excellent performance exhibited over some HUC regions. We also delineate two regions that influence model performance, one where microtopography around streams dominates (D2), and another where a mix of subsurface heterogeneity and topographic gradients dominate (D1). Improvements in topography from CONUS1 to CONUS2 generally result in better streamflow and water table depth performances. Advancements in the subsurface depth and structure also produce better water table estimates.« less

Authors:
; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC); National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI Identifier:
2202898
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 2305641
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-191029
Journal ID: ISSN 0022-1694; S0022169423012362; 130294; PII: S0022169423012362
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231; AC05-76RL01830; OAC- 2054506; OAC-1835855
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Hydrology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Hydrology Journal Volume: 626 Journal Issue: PB; Journal ID: ISSN 0022-1694
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
Netherlands
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; ParFlow CONUS 2.0; large-scale; hyper-resolution; integrated hydrologic modeling; groundwater; surface water

Citation Formats

Yang, Chen, Tijerina-Kreuzer, Danielle T., Tran, Hoang V., Condon, Laura E., and Maxwell, Reed M. A high-resolution, 3D groundwater-surface water simulation of the contiguous US: Advances in the integrated ParFlow CONUS 2.0 modeling platform. Netherlands: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130294.
Yang, Chen, Tijerina-Kreuzer, Danielle T., Tran, Hoang V., Condon, Laura E., & Maxwell, Reed M. A high-resolution, 3D groundwater-surface water simulation of the contiguous US: Advances in the integrated ParFlow CONUS 2.0 modeling platform. Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130294
Yang, Chen, Tijerina-Kreuzer, Danielle T., Tran, Hoang V., Condon, Laura E., and Maxwell, Reed M. Wed . "A high-resolution, 3D groundwater-surface water simulation of the contiguous US: Advances in the integrated ParFlow CONUS 2.0 modeling platform". Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130294.
@article{osti_2202898,
title = {A high-resolution, 3D groundwater-surface water simulation of the contiguous US: Advances in the integrated ParFlow CONUS 2.0 modeling platform},
author = {Yang, Chen and Tijerina-Kreuzer, Danielle T. and Tran, Hoang V. and Condon, Laura E. and Maxwell, Reed M.},
abstractNote = {Large-scale, high-resolution hydrologic modeling is an important tool to address questions of water quantity, availability, and potential recharge. Continental-to-Global scale models, particularly those that include groundwater, are growing in number. However, many of these approaches simplify aspects of the system and the connections between surface water and groundwater. The ParFlow CONUS modeling platform is a large-scale, hyper-resolution, hydrologic model that relies on the integrated solution of 3D partial differential equations that describe groundwater, soil, and 2D surface water flow. The prior version, ParFlow CONUS 1.0, was the first large-scale hydrologic model that included an explicit treatment of lateral groundwater flow for the contiguous US (CONUS). Here, we present the ParFlow CONUS 2.0 integrated hydrologic model. This model extends to the coastlines and contributing basins for CONUS and is consistent with the NOAA National Water Model. Here we document the roughly five years of technical development of this platform, present steady-state simulation results, rigorously compare these results to the prior ParFlow CONUS 1.0 simulations and evaluate the model performance based on observations. Simulated water table depth and streamflow were evaluated using more than 635K observations from USGS monitoring wells, other compiled groundwater datasets, and NHD and USGS streamflow gauges. Our results demonstrate improvement in both groundwater and surface water simulations over the prior generation model for all USGS Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) basins. These results suggest that this current generation hydrologic model has good to excellent streamflow performance over the entire CONUS, with almost half of the HUC subbasins exhibiting excellent performance based on normalized root-square error (RSR). These results suggest that the current generation model approaches good performance for water table depth over the CONUS, a metric not usually compared directly at all in large-scale studies, with good-to-excellent performance exhibited over some HUC regions. We also delineate two regions that influence model performance, one where microtopography around streams dominates (D2), and another where a mix of subsurface heterogeneity and topographic gradients dominate (D1). Improvements in topography from CONUS1 to CONUS2 generally result in better streamflow and water table depth performances. Advancements in the subsurface depth and structure also produce better water table estimates.},
doi = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130294},
journal = {Journal of Hydrology},
number = PB,
volume = 626,
place = {Netherlands},
year = {Wed Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2023},
month = {Wed Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2023}
}

Works referenced in this record:

The groundwater–land-surface–atmosphere connection: Soil moisture effects on the atmospheric boundary layer in fully-coupled simulations
journal, December 2007


Studying the influence of groundwater representations on land surface-atmosphere feedbacks during the European heat wave in 2003: Groundwater Feedbacks on 2003 Heat Wave
journal, November 2016

  • Keune, Jessica; Gasper, Fabian; Goergen, Klaus
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025426

Global Topographic Slope Enforcement to Ensure Connectivity and Drainage in an Urban Terrain
journal, April 2016


Resolution matters when modeling climate change in headwaters of the Colorado River
journal, September 2020

  • Foster, Lauren M.; Williams, Kenneth H.; Maxwell, Reed M.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 15, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aba77f

The imprint of climate and geology on the residence times of groundwater
journal, January 2016

  • Maxwell, Reed M.; Condon, Laura E.; Kollet, Stefan J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015GL066916

Improved numerical solvers for implicit coupling of subsurface and overland flow
journal, December 2014


A glimpse beneath earth's surface: GLobal HYdrogeology MaPS (GLHYMPS) of permeability and porosity
journal, June 2014

  • Gleeson, Tom; Moosdorf, Nils; Hartmann, Jens
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 41, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014GL059856

Leveraging HPC accelerator architectures with modern techniques — hydrologic modeling on GPUs with ParFlow
journal, May 2021


Accelerating the Lagrangian simulation of water ages on distributed, multi-GPU platforms: The importance of dynamic load balancing
journal, September 2022


Proof of concept of regional scale hydrologic simulations at hydrologic resolution utilizing massively parallel computer resources: RAPID COMMUNICATION
journal, April 2010

  • Kollet, Stefan J.; Maxwell, Reed M.; Woodward, Carol S.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 46, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008730

Impact of grid resolution on the integrated and distributed response of a coupled surface-subsurface hydrological model for the des Anglais catchment, Quebec
journal, December 2010

  • Sulis, Mauro; Paniconi, Claudio; Camporese, Matteo
  • Hydrological Processes, Vol. 25, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7941

A national topographic dataset for hydrological modeling over the contiguous United States
journal, January 2021


The global volume and distribution of modern groundwater
journal, November 2015

  • Gleeson, Tom; Befus, Kevin M.; Jasechko, Scott
  • Nature Geoscience, Vol. 9, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2590

Assessment of the ParFlow–CLM CONUS 1.0 integrated hydrologic model: evaluation of hyper-resolution water balance components across the contiguous United States
journal, November 2021

  • O'Neill, Mary M. F.; Tijerina, Danielle T.; Condon, Laura E.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 14, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-7223-2021

A global-scale two-layer transient groundwater model: Development and application to groundwater depletion
journal, April 2017


Impacts of grid resolution on surface energy fluxes simulated with an integrated surface-groundwater flow model
journal, January 2015


Deep Meteoric Water Circulation in Earth's Crust
journal, March 2021

  • McIntosh, Jennifer C.; Ferguson, Grant
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 48, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020GL090461

Global Groundwater Modeling and Monitoring: Opportunities and Challenges
journal, December 2021

  • Condon, Laura E.; Kollet, Stefan; Bierkens, Marc F. P.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 57, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020WR029500

A Global High‐Resolution Data Set of Soil Hydraulic and Thermal Properties for Land Surface Modeling
journal, September 2019

  • Dai, Yongjiu; Xin, Qinchuan; Wei, Nan
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001784

Global Patterns of Groundwater Table Depth
journal, February 2013


Hydrologic regulation of plant rooting depth
journal, September 2017

  • Fan, Ying; Miguez-Macho, Gonzalo; Jobbágy, Esteban G.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, Issue 40
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712381114

Hillslope Hydrology in Global Change Research and Earth System Modeling
journal, February 2019

  • Fan, Y.; Clark, M.; Lawrence, D. M.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 55, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018WR023903

Incorporating water table dynamics in climate modeling: 1. Water table observations and equilibrium water table simulations: WATER TABLE OBSERVATIONS
journal, May 2007

  • Fan, Ying; Miguez-Macho, Gonzalo; Weaver, Christopher P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 112, Issue D10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2006JD008111

Database-Related Accuracy and Uncertainty of Pedotransfer Functions
journal, January 1998


Continental Hydrologic Intercomparison Project, Phase 1: A Large‐Scale Hydrologic Model Comparison Over the Continental United States
journal, June 2021

  • Tijerina, Danielle; Condon, Laura; FitzGerald, Katelyn
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 57, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020WR028931

Groundwater deeper than 500 m contributes less than 0.1% of global river discharge
journal, February 2023

  • Ferguson, Grant; McIntosh, Jennifer C.; Jasechko, Scott
  • Communications Earth & Environment, Vol. 4, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-00697-6

Mapping permeability over the surface of the Earth: MAPPING GLOBAL PERMEABILITY
journal, January 2011

  • Gleeson, Tom; Smith, Leslie; Moosdorf, Nils
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 38, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010GL045565

A high-resolution simulation of groundwater and surface water over most of the continental US with the integrated hydrologic model ParFlow v3
journal, January 2015

  • Maxwell, R. M.; Condon, L. E.; Kollet, S. J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-923-2015

Integrated surface–groundwater flow modeling: A free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model
journal, July 2006


Mapping the global depth to bedrock for land surface modeling: GLOBAL MAP OF DEPTH TO BEDROCK
journal, January 2017

  • Shangguan, Wei; Hengl, Tomislav; Mendes de Jesus, Jorge
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016MS000686

A hydrological simulation dataset of the Upper Colorado River Basin from 1983 to 2019
journal, January 2022


Surface-subsurface model intercomparison: A first set of benchmark results to diagnose integrated hydrology and feedbacks
journal, February 2014

  • Maxwell, Reed M.; Putti, Mario; Meyerhoff, Steven
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 50, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013WR013725

The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d: model description and evaluation
journal, January 2021

  • Müller Schmied, Hannes; Cáceres, Denise; Eisner, Stephanie
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-1037-2021

Continental-scale evaluation of a fully distributed coupled land surface and groundwater model, ParFlow-CLM (v3.6.0), over Europe
journal, March 2023

  • Naz, Bibi S.; Sharples, Wendy; Ma, Yueling
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 16, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-16-1617-2023

Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models: REPRESENTING HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES IN EARTH SYSTEM MODELS
journal, August 2015

  • Clark, Martyn P.; Fan, Ying; Lawrence, David M.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 51, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015WR017096

A high-resolution global-scale groundwater model
journal, January 2015

  • de Graaf, I. E. M.; Sutanudjaja, E. H.; van Beek, L. P. H.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 19, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-19-823-2015

Quantitative assessment of groundwater controls across major US river basins using a multi-model regression algorithm
journal, August 2015


Compiling and Mapping Global Permeability of the Unconsolidated and Consolidated Earth: GLobal HYdrogeology MaPS 2.0 (GLHYMPS 2.0)
journal, February 2018

  • Huscroft, Jordan; Gleeson, Tom; Hartmann, Jens
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1002/2017GL075860

A spatially comprehensive, hydrometeorological data set for Mexico, the U.S., and Southern Canada 1950–2013
journal, August 2015

  • Livneh, Ben; Bohn, Theodore J.; Pierce, David W.
  • Scientific Data, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2015.42

Importance of Spatial Resolution in Global Groundwater Modeling
journal, March 2020

  • Reinecke, Robert; Wachholz, Alexander; Mehl, Steffen
  • Groundwater, Vol. 58, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gwat.12996

Simulating the sensitivity of evapotranspiration and streamflow to large-scale groundwater depletion
journal, June 2019


Soil structure is an important omission in Earth System Models
journal, January 2020


A review of the global soil property maps for Earth system models
journal, January 2019


Where Is the Bottom of a Watershed?
journal, March 2020

  • Condon, Laura E.; Markovich, Katherine H.; Kelleher, Christa A.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 56, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019WR026010

Evapotranspiration depletes groundwater under warming over the contiguous United States
journal, February 2020


Accelerating the Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Hydrologic Modeling to Continental‐Scale
journal, May 2023

  • Yang, Chen; Ponder, Carl; Wang, Bei
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 15, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1029/2022MS003507

Connections between groundwater flow and transpiration partitioning
journal, July 2016


GMD perspective: The quest to improve the evaluation of groundwater representation in continental- to global-scale models
journal, December 2021

  • Gleeson, Tom; Wagener, Thorsten; Döll, Petra
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 14, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-7545-2021

Continental Scale Hydrostratigraphy: Comparing Geologically Informed Data Products to Analytical Solutions
journal, September 2023

  • Swilley, Jackson S.; Tijerina‐Kreuzer, Danielle; Tran, Hoang V.
  • Groundwater
  • DOI: 10.1111/gwat.13354

A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United States*
journal, November 2002


Continental Scale Hydrostratigraphy: Basin‐Scale Testing of Alternative Data‐Driven Approaches
journal, October 2023

  • Tijerina‐Kreuzer, Danielle; Swilley, Jackson S.; Tran, Hoang V.
  • Groundwater
  • DOI: 10.1111/gwat.13357

Newton–Krylov-multigrid solvers for large-scale, highly heterogeneous, variably saturated flow problems
journal, July 2001


A Parallel Multigrid Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Groundwater Flow Simulations
journal, September 1996

  • Ashby, Steven F.; Falgout, Robert D.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 124, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE96-A24230

Challenges in developing a global gradient-based groundwater model (G<sup>3</sup>M v1.0) for the integration into a global hydrological model
journal, June 2019

  • Reinecke, Robert; Foglia, Laura; Mehl, Steffen
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-2401-2019

Capillary Conduction of Liquids Through Porous Mediums
journal, November 1931


A global soil data set for earth system modeling
journal, March 2014

  • Shangguan, Wei; Dai, Yongjiu; Duan, Qingyun
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2013MS000293

Accelerating the Lagrangian particle tracking of residence time distributions and source water mixing towards large scales
journal, June 2021