DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The good, the bad, and the future: Systematic review identifies best use of biomass to meet air quality and climate policies in California

Abstract

Abstract California has large and diverse biomass resources and provides a pertinent example of how biomass use is changing and needs to change, in the face of climate mitigation policies. As in other areas of the world, California needs to optimize its use of biomass and waste to meet environmental and socioeconomic objectives. We used a systematic review to assess biomass use pathways in California and the associated impacts on climate and air quality. Biomass uses included the production of renewable fuels, electricity, biochar, compost, and other marketable products. For those biomass use pathways recently developed, information is available on the effects—usually beneficial—on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and there is some, but less, published information on the effects on criteria pollutants. Our review identifies 34 biomass use pathways with beneficial impacts on either GHG or pollutant emissions, or both—the “good.” These included combustion of forest biomass for power and conversion of livestock‐associated biomass to biogas by anaerobic digestion. The review identified 13 biomass use pathways with adverse impacts on GHG emissions, criteria pollutant emissions, or both—the “bad.” Wildfires are an example of one out of eight pathways which were found to be bad for both climate and air quality, whilemore » only two biomass use pathways reduced GHG emissions relative to an identified counterfactual but had adverse air quality impacts. Issues of high interest for the “future” included land management to reduce fire risk, future policies for the dairy industries, and full life‐cycle analysis of biomass production and use.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Department of Plant Sciences University of California Davis Davis California USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
2004594
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 2202697
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Global Change Biology. Bioenergy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy Journal Volume: 15 Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 1757-1693
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Freer‐Smith, Peter, Bailey‐Bale, Jack H., Donnison, Caspar L., and Taylor, Gail. The good, the bad, and the future: Systematic review identifies best use of biomass to meet air quality and climate policies in California. United Kingdom: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13101.
Freer‐Smith, Peter, Bailey‐Bale, Jack H., Donnison, Caspar L., & Taylor, Gail. The good, the bad, and the future: Systematic review identifies best use of biomass to meet air quality and climate policies in California. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13101
Freer‐Smith, Peter, Bailey‐Bale, Jack H., Donnison, Caspar L., and Taylor, Gail. Sat . "The good, the bad, and the future: Systematic review identifies best use of biomass to meet air quality and climate policies in California". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13101.
@article{osti_2004594,
title = {The good, the bad, and the future: Systematic review identifies best use of biomass to meet air quality and climate policies in California},
author = {Freer‐Smith, Peter and Bailey‐Bale, Jack H. and Donnison, Caspar L. and Taylor, Gail},
abstractNote = {Abstract California has large and diverse biomass resources and provides a pertinent example of how biomass use is changing and needs to change, in the face of climate mitigation policies. As in other areas of the world, California needs to optimize its use of biomass and waste to meet environmental and socioeconomic objectives. We used a systematic review to assess biomass use pathways in California and the associated impacts on climate and air quality. Biomass uses included the production of renewable fuels, electricity, biochar, compost, and other marketable products. For those biomass use pathways recently developed, information is available on the effects—usually beneficial—on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and there is some, but less, published information on the effects on criteria pollutants. Our review identifies 34 biomass use pathways with beneficial impacts on either GHG or pollutant emissions, or both—the “good.” These included combustion of forest biomass for power and conversion of livestock‐associated biomass to biogas by anaerobic digestion. The review identified 13 biomass use pathways with adverse impacts on GHG emissions, criteria pollutant emissions, or both—the “bad.” Wildfires are an example of one out of eight pathways which were found to be bad for both climate and air quality, while only two biomass use pathways reduced GHG emissions relative to an identified counterfactual but had adverse air quality impacts. Issues of high interest for the “future” included land management to reduce fire risk, future policies for the dairy industries, and full life‐cycle analysis of biomass production and use.},
doi = {10.1111/gcbb.13101},
journal = {Global Change Biology. Bioenergy},
number = 11,
volume = 15,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Sat Sep 23 00:00:00 EDT 2023},
month = {Sat Sep 23 00:00:00 EDT 2023}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.13101

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Dairy Cows and Their Waste as Measured by Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry
journal, February 2007

  • Shaw, Stephanie L.; Mitloehner, Frank M.; Jackson, Wendi
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 41, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/es061475e

Effects of biochar and fertilizer sources on nitrogen uptake by chilli pepper plants under Mediterranean climate
journal, September 2021

  • Duan, Yinghua; Gao, Suduan; Hanson, Brad
  • Soil Use and Management, Vol. 38, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/sum.12759

Life cycle assessment of rice husk torrefaction and prospects for decentralized facilities at rice mills
journal, December 2020


Projecting full build-out environmental impacts and roll-out strategies associated with viable hydrogen fueling infrastructure strategies
journal, November 2011

  • Stephens-Romero, Shane D.; Brown, Tim M.; Carreras-Sospedra, Marc
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 36, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.08.005

Feasibility Study of Biogas Reforming To Improve Energy Efficiency and To Reduce Nitrogen Oxide Emissions
journal, January 2017

  • Dabir, Sasan; Cao, Mingyuan; Prosser, Richard
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol. 56, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04290

Renewable natural gas in California: An assessment of the technical and economic potential
journal, December 2017


A synthesis of the ecosystem services impact of second generation bioenergy crop production
journal, June 2015


Impact of Composting Food Waste with Green Waste on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Compost Windrows
journal, January 2019


Source Apportionment of Ambient Methane Enhancements in Los Angeles, California, To Evaluate Emission Inventory Estimates
journal, March 2019

  • Kuwayama, Toshihiro; Charrier-Klobas, Jessica G.; Chen, Yanju
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 53, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02307

Using National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter to assess regional wildland fire smoke and air quality management
journal, October 2017


Volatile Fatty acids and Alcohols Production during Anaerobic Storage of Dairy Manure
journal, January 2011


Valorization of tomato pomace by sequential lycopene extraction and anaerobic digestion
journal, October 2017


Low carbon fuel standards: Implementation scenarios and challenges
journal, November 2010


Atmospheric impacts of black carbon emission reductions through the strategic use of biodiesel in California
journal, December 2015


Interannual Variations in PM2.5 due to Wildfires in the Western United States
journal, April 2008

  • Jaffe, Dan; Hafner, William; Chand, Duli
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 42, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/es702755v

Interactions of fire emissions and urban pollution over California: Ozone formation and air quality simulations
journal, September 2012


Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-mediated Responses
journal, March 2010


Direct Measurements of the Ozone Formation Potential from Livestock and Poultry Waste Emissions
journal, March 2010

  • Howard, Cody J.; Kumar, Anuj; Mitloehner, Frank
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1021/es901916b

Quantifying O 3 Impacts in Urban Areas Due to Wildfires Using a Generalized Additive Model
journal, November 2017

  • Gong, Xi; Kaulfus, Aaron; Nair, Udaysankar
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 51, Issue 22
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03130

Analysing the effects of the 2002 McNally fire on air quality in the San Joaquin Valley and southern Sierra Nevada, California
journal, January 2012

  • Cisneros, Ricardo; Schweizer, Donald; Zhong, Sharon
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire, Vol. 21, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1071/wf11025

Air-Quality Impacts and Intake Fraction of PM 2.5 during the 2013 Rim Megafire
journal, October 2016

  • Navarro, Kathleen M.; Cisneros, Ricardo; O’Neill, Susan M.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02252

Engine power generation and emission performance of syngas generated from low-density biomass
journal, September 2017


Inflammatory marker and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent responses in human macrophages exposed to emissions from biodiesel fuels
journal, April 2019


Biochar Field Study: Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Productivity, and Nutrients in Two Soils
journal, September 2016


Policy Implications of Uncertainty in Modeled Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Biofuels
journal, December 2010

  • Mullins, Kimberley A.; Griffin, W. Michael; Matthews, H. Scott
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/es1024993

Size distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon particulate emission factors from agricultural burning
journal, April 2007


Technoeconomic and emissions evaluation of mobile in-woods biochar production
journal, November 2020


A causal analysis framework for land-use change and the potential role of bioenergy policy
journal, December 2016


From Grease to Gas: Anaerobic Digestion of Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) at the Hyperion Treatment Plant
conference, January 2011

  • Palacios, Ronald N.; Fan, Steven S.; Lee, Hansong
  • ASME 2011 5th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, Parts A, B, and C
  • DOI: 10.1115/ES2011-54108

Obtaining Multiple Coproducts from Red Grape Pomace via Anthocyanin Extraction and Biogas Production
journal, July 2018

  • Allison, Brittany J.; Simmons, Christopher W.
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol. 66, Issue 30
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02250

The future of bioenergy
journal, December 2019

  • Reid, Walter V.; Ali, Mariam K.; Field, Christopher B.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 26, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14883

Carbon Abatement and Emissions Associated with the Gasification of Walnut Shells for Bioenergy and Biochar Production
journal, March 2016


Seasonal Challenges for a Zero-Carbon Grid in California
conference, June 2021

  • Abido, Mahmoud Y.; Shiraishi, Kenji; Sanchez-Perez, Pedro Andres
  • 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)
  • DOI: 10.1109/PVSC43889.2021.9518816

Carbon intensity of corn ethanol in the United States: state of the science
journal, March 2021

  • Scully, Melissa J.; Norris, Gregory A.; Alarcon Falconi, Tania M.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 16, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abde08

Getting to Neutral: Options for Negative Carbon Emissions in California
report, January 2020

  • Baker, Sarah E.; Stolaroff, Joshuah K.; Peridas, George
  • DOI: 10.2172/1597217

Evaluating greenhouse gas impacts of organic waste management options using life cycle assessment
journal, May 2012

  • Kong, Dung; Shan, Jilei; Iacoboni, Mario
  • Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, Vol. 30, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1177/0734242x12440479

Impact of pine chip biochar on trace greenhouse gas emissions and soil nutrient dynamics in an annual ryegrass system in California
journal, June 2014


Sugar beet ethanol (Beta vulgaris L.): A promising low-carbon pathway for ethanol production in California
journal, January 2018


Biochar does not mitigate field-scale N2O emissions in a Northern California vineyard: An assessment across two years
journal, June 2014


PM2.5 source profiles for black and organic carbon emission inventories
journal, October 2011


Emissions of Acrolein and Other Aldehydes from Biodiesel-Fueled Heavy-Duty Vehicles
journal, July 2012

  • Cahill, Thomas M.; Okamoto, Robert A.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1021/es301659u

Innovative wood use can enable carbon-beneficial forest management in California
journal, November 2021

  • Cabiyo, Bodie; Fried, Jeremy S.; Collins, Brandon M.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 118, Issue 49
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2019073118

Regional sources of airborne ultrafine particle number and mass concentrations in California
journal, December 2019

  • Yu, Xin; Venecek, Melissa; Kumar, Anikender
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-14677-2019

Seasonal Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Methane, Carbon Dioxide, Nitrous Oxide) from Engineered Landfills: Daily, Intermediate, and Final California Cover Soils
journal, January 2011

  • Bogner, Jean E.; Spokas, Kurt A.; Chanton, Jeffrey P.
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 40, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2010.0407

Real-time and time-integrated PM2.5 and CO from prescribed burns in chipped and non-chipped plots: firefighter and community exposure and health implications
journal, May 2006

  • Naeher, Luke P.; Achtemeier, Gary L.; Glitzenstein, Jeff S.
  • Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, Vol. 16, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500497

Response to Santeramo and Searle (2019)
journal, February 2020


Field measurements and modeling to resolve m2 to km2 CH4 emissions for a complex urban source: An Indiana landfill study
journal, January 2017

  • Cambaliza, Maria Obiminda L.; Bogner, Jean E.; Green, Roger B.
  • Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, Vol. 5
  • DOI: 10.1525/elementa.145

A New Approach to Maximize the Potential of Reciprocating Engines Operating on Bio-Fuel Energy
conference, January 2011

  • Lam, Henry; Richter, Mark; Ashton, Geoff
  • ASME 2011 5th International Conference on Energy Sustainability, Parts A, B, and C
  • DOI: 10.1115/ES2011-54496

Greenhouse gas emissions from green waste composting windrow
journal, January 2017


Prescribed Fire As a Means of Reducing Forest Carbon Emissions in the Western United States
journal, March 2010

  • Wiedinmyer, Christine; Hurteau, Matthew D.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/es902455e

Comparison of Heat Transfer and Soil Impacts of Air Curtain Burner Burning and Slash Pile Burning
journal, August 2017

  • Jang, Woongsoon; Page-Dumroese, Deborah; Han, Han-Sup
  • Forests, Vol. 8, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.3390/f8080297

Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of food waste and relevant air quality implications
journal, June 2017


Temporal and geographic drivers of biomass residues in California
journal, December 2018


Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard
journal, February 2022

  • Lark, Tyler J.; Hendricks, Nathan P.; Smith, Aaron
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 119, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101084119

Trade‐offs across productivity, GHG intensity, and pollutant loads from second‐generation sorghum bioenergy
journal, September 2017

  • Fertitta‐Roberts, Cara; Spatari, Sabrina; Grantz, David A.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12471

Assessment of the emissions and air quality impacts of biomass and biogas use in California
journal, September 2015

  • Carreras-Sospedra, Marc; Williams, Robert; Dabdub, Donald
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 66, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2015.1087892

The wood in the forest: Why California needs to reexamine the role of biomass in climate policy
journal, July 2015


Market Potential for CO2 Removal and Sequestration from Renewable Natural Gas Production in California
journal, March 2022

  • Wong, Jun; Santoso, Jonathan; Went, Marjorie
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 56, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02894

Systematic planning to optimize investments in hydrogen infrastructure deployment
journal, May 2010

  • Stephens-Romero, Shane D.; Brown, Tim M.; Kang, Jee E.
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 35, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.024

A special issue on the RCPs
journal, August 2011

  • van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Edmonds, James A.; Kainuma, Mikiko
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 109, Issue 1-2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0157-y

Production, fuel properties and combustion testing of an iso-olefins blendstock for modern vehicles
journal, February 2022


Evaluation of the Impacts of Biodiesel and Second Generation Biofuels on NOx Emissions for CARB Diesel Fuels
journal, July 2012

  • Hajbabaei, Maryam; Johnson, Kent C.; Okamoto, Robert A.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1021/es300739r

Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide for different arboricultural practices in Los Angeles, CA
journal, January 2015

  • McPherson, E. Gregory; Kendall, Alissa; Albers, Shannon
  • Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2015.04.004

A Survey of VOC Emissions from Rendering Plants
journal, January 2017

  • Guerra, Fernanda D.; Smith, Jr., Gary Douglas; Alexis, Frank
  • Aerosol and Air Quality Research, Vol. 17, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0391

Volatile organic compound emissions from green waste composting: Characterization and ozone formation
journal, March 2011


Direct green waste land application: How to reduce its impacts on greenhouse gas and volatile organic compound emissions?
journal, June 2016


Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter in Southeast Texas using a source-oriented 3D air quality model
journal, September 2010


The spatial and temporal distribution of crop residue burning in the contiguous United States
journal, October 2009

  • McCarty, Jessica L.; Korontzi, Stefania; Justice, Christopher O.
  • Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 407, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.009

Investigation of high ozone events due to wildfire smoke in an urban area
journal, December 2018


A review of variability in indirect land use change assessment and modeling in biofuel policy
journal, May 2013


Comparison of Field Measurements to Methane Emissions Models at a New Landfill
journal, August 2016

  • De la Cruz, Florentino B.; Green, Roger B.; Hater, Gary R.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 50, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00415