DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Designing Iowa Agricultural Landscapes to Improve Environmental Co-Benefits of Bioenergy Production

Abstract

Cellulosic bioenergy feedstocks are needed to improve carbon (C) management while provisioning biomass for bioproducts and biofuel. The transition to increased cellulosic biomass production can be guided by land management plans designed to improve economic, environmental, and ecological performance. We constructed a sustainability model to compare landscape designs for biofuel production from corn (Zea mays L.) stover and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in central Iowa, USA. We used the model to compare environmental and socioeconomic outcomes associated with four landscape management strategies, with and without cellulosic biomass markets. We evaluated (1) a fuelshed area containing over 1.2 million ha (3 million acres) of corn and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) within 80 km (50 miles) of a commercial-scale cellulosic biorefinery in Nevada, Iowa, and (2) the South Fork watershed containing over 72,000 ha (178,000 acres) of these row crops within eight north central Iowa HUC-12 (hydrologic unit code) watersheds. At both landscape scales, we found that it is possible to achieve multiple environmental and socioeconomic benefits concomitantly with cellulosic biomass production by strategically collecting corn stover and converting the 10% of the lowest-profitability row crop land to perennial switchgrass. Potential benefits from landscape design include increased biodiversity, soil and watermore » quality improvements, increased soil carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation, and reduced fertilizer use and cost. Our model results showed that increasing benefits can accrue when complementary conservation practices (e.g., reduced tillage, use of a rye cover crop) are combined and integrated throughout a fuelshed or watershed area. We conclude that ecologically based landscape designs offer valuable insights about costs and benefits of land management alternatives, with relevance for achieving stakeholder goals.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE); US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
OSTI Identifier:
1986560
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1987776
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Sustainability (Basel)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Sustainability (Basel) Journal Volume: 15 Journal Issue: 13; Journal ID: ISSN 2071-1050
Publisher:
MDPI AG
Country of Publication:
Switzerland
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; biodiversity; bioenergy; carbon sequestration; corn stover; ecosystem services; landscape management; soil quality; sustainability; switchgrass; water quality

Citation Formats

Parish, Esther S., Karlen, Douglas L., Kline, Keith L., Comer, Kevin S., and Belden, William W. Designing Iowa Agricultural Landscapes to Improve Environmental Co-Benefits of Bioenergy Production. Switzerland: N. p., 2023. Web. doi:10.3390/su151310051.
Parish, Esther S., Karlen, Douglas L., Kline, Keith L., Comer, Kevin S., & Belden, William W. Designing Iowa Agricultural Landscapes to Improve Environmental Co-Benefits of Bioenergy Production. Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310051
Parish, Esther S., Karlen, Douglas L., Kline, Keith L., Comer, Kevin S., and Belden, William W. Sun . "Designing Iowa Agricultural Landscapes to Improve Environmental Co-Benefits of Bioenergy Production". Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310051.
@article{osti_1986560,
title = {Designing Iowa Agricultural Landscapes to Improve Environmental Co-Benefits of Bioenergy Production},
author = {Parish, Esther S. and Karlen, Douglas L. and Kline, Keith L. and Comer, Kevin S. and Belden, William W.},
abstractNote = {Cellulosic bioenergy feedstocks are needed to improve carbon (C) management while provisioning biomass for bioproducts and biofuel. The transition to increased cellulosic biomass production can be guided by land management plans designed to improve economic, environmental, and ecological performance. We constructed a sustainability model to compare landscape designs for biofuel production from corn (Zea mays L.) stover and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in central Iowa, USA. We used the model to compare environmental and socioeconomic outcomes associated with four landscape management strategies, with and without cellulosic biomass markets. We evaluated (1) a fuelshed area containing over 1.2 million ha (3 million acres) of corn and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) within 80 km (50 miles) of a commercial-scale cellulosic biorefinery in Nevada, Iowa, and (2) the South Fork watershed containing over 72,000 ha (178,000 acres) of these row crops within eight north central Iowa HUC-12 (hydrologic unit code) watersheds. At both landscape scales, we found that it is possible to achieve multiple environmental and socioeconomic benefits concomitantly with cellulosic biomass production by strategically collecting corn stover and converting the 10% of the lowest-profitability row crop land to perennial switchgrass. Potential benefits from landscape design include increased biodiversity, soil and water quality improvements, increased soil carbon sequestration for climate change mitigation, and reduced fertilizer use and cost. Our model results showed that increasing benefits can accrue when complementary conservation practices (e.g., reduced tillage, use of a rye cover crop) are combined and integrated throughout a fuelshed or watershed area. We conclude that ecologically based landscape designs offer valuable insights about costs and benefits of land management alternatives, with relevance for achieving stakeholder goals.},
doi = {10.3390/su151310051},
journal = {Sustainability (Basel)},
number = 13,
volume = 15,
place = {Switzerland},
year = {Sun Jun 25 00:00:00 EDT 2023},
month = {Sun Jun 25 00:00:00 EDT 2023}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310051

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Sustainable agricultural residue removal for bioenergy: A spatially comprehensive US national assessment
journal, February 2013


Subfield profitability analysis reveals an economic case for cropland diversification
journal, January 2016


Engaging stakeholders to assess landscape sustainability
journal, June 2019


Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement
journal, July 2018


Monitoring Soil Quality to Assess the Sustainability of Harvesting Corn Stover
journal, January 2011

  • Karlen, Douglas L.; Varvel, Gary E.; Johnson, Jane M. F.
  • Agronomy Journal, Vol. 103, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2134/agronj2010.0160s

Assessing multimetric aspects of sustainability: Application to a bioenergy crop production system in East Tennessee
journal, February 2016

  • Parish, Esther S.; Dale, Virginia H.; English, Burton C.
  • Ecosphere, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1206

Perennial biomass feedstocks enhance avian diversity: BIOMASS FEEDSTOCKS AND AVIAN DIVERSITY
journal, December 2010


Targeted subfield switchgrass integration could improve the farm economy, water quality, and bioenergy feedstock production
journal, October 2017

  • Brandes, Elke; McNunn, Gabe S.; Schulte, Lisa A.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12481

Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy
journal, April 1998


Growing grasses in unprofitable areas of US Midwest croplands could increase species richness
journal, September 2021