DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Environmental controls on the light use efficiency of terrestrial gross primary production

Abstract

Abstract Gross primary production (GPP) by terrestrial ecosystems is a key quantity in the global carbon cycle. The instantaneous controls of leaf‐level photosynthesis are well established, but there is still no consensus on the mechanisms by which canopy‐level GPP depends on spatial and temporal variation in the environment. The standard model of photosynthesis provides a robust mechanistic representation for C 3 species; however, additional assumptions are required to “scale up” from leaf to canopy. As a consequence, competing models make inconsistent predictions about how GPP will respond to continuing environmental change. This problem is addressed here by means of an empirical analysis of the light use efficiency (LUE) of GPP inferred from eddy covariance carbon dioxide flux measurements, in situ measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and remotely sensed estimates of the fraction of PAR (fAPAR) absorbed by the vegetation canopy. Focusing on LUE allows potential drivers of GPP to be separated from its overriding dependence on light. GPP data from over 100 sites, collated over 20 years and located in a range of biomes and climate zones, were extracted from the FLUXNET2015 database and combined with remotely sensed fAPAR data to estimate daily LUE. Daytime air temperature, vapor pressure deficit,more » diffuse fraction of solar radiation, and soil moisture were shown to be salient predictors of LUE in a generalized linear mixed‐effects model. The same model design was fitted to site‐based LUE estimates generated by 16 terrestrial ecosystem models. The published models showed wide variation in the shape, the strength, and even the sign of the environmental effects on modeled LUE. These findings highlight important model deficiencies and suggest a need to progress beyond simple “goodness of fit” comparisons of inferred and predicted carbon fluxes toward an approach focused on the functional responses of the underlying dependencies.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]
  1. Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London Ascot UK
  2. Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich Switzerland, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland, Institute of Geography University of Bern Bern Switzerland, Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland
  3. Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley Berkeley California USA, Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA
  4. Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London Ascot UK, Department of Biological Sciences Macquarie University North Ryde New South Wales Australia, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modelling, Department of Earth System Science Tsinghua University Beijing China
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
OSTI Identifier:
1900055
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1900056; OSTI ID: 1987512
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-05CH11231; 80NSSC21K1705
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Global Change Biology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Global Change Biology Journal Volume: 29 Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 1354-1013
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; diffuse radiation; eddy covariance; FLUXNET; light use efficiency; soil moisture; temperature; terrestrial biosphere model; vapor pressure deficit

Citation Formats

Bloomfield, Keith J., Stocker, Benjamin D., Keenan, Trevor F., and Prentice, I. Colin. Environmental controls on the light use efficiency of terrestrial gross primary production. United Kingdom: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1111/gcb.16511.
Bloomfield, Keith J., Stocker, Benjamin D., Keenan, Trevor F., & Prentice, I. Colin. Environmental controls on the light use efficiency of terrestrial gross primary production. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16511
Bloomfield, Keith J., Stocker, Benjamin D., Keenan, Trevor F., and Prentice, I. Colin. Fri . "Environmental controls on the light use efficiency of terrestrial gross primary production". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16511.
@article{osti_1900055,
title = {Environmental controls on the light use efficiency of terrestrial gross primary production},
author = {Bloomfield, Keith J. and Stocker, Benjamin D. and Keenan, Trevor F. and Prentice, I. Colin},
abstractNote = {Abstract Gross primary production (GPP) by terrestrial ecosystems is a key quantity in the global carbon cycle. The instantaneous controls of leaf‐level photosynthesis are well established, but there is still no consensus on the mechanisms by which canopy‐level GPP depends on spatial and temporal variation in the environment. The standard model of photosynthesis provides a robust mechanistic representation for C 3 species; however, additional assumptions are required to “scale up” from leaf to canopy. As a consequence, competing models make inconsistent predictions about how GPP will respond to continuing environmental change. This problem is addressed here by means of an empirical analysis of the light use efficiency (LUE) of GPP inferred from eddy covariance carbon dioxide flux measurements, in situ measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and remotely sensed estimates of the fraction of PAR (fAPAR) absorbed by the vegetation canopy. Focusing on LUE allows potential drivers of GPP to be separated from its overriding dependence on light. GPP data from over 100 sites, collated over 20 years and located in a range of biomes and climate zones, were extracted from the FLUXNET2015 database and combined with remotely sensed fAPAR data to estimate daily LUE. Daytime air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, diffuse fraction of solar radiation, and soil moisture were shown to be salient predictors of LUE in a generalized linear mixed‐effects model. The same model design was fitted to site‐based LUE estimates generated by 16 terrestrial ecosystem models. The published models showed wide variation in the shape, the strength, and even the sign of the environmental effects on modeled LUE. These findings highlight important model deficiencies and suggest a need to progress beyond simple “goodness of fit” comparisons of inferred and predicted carbon fluxes toward an approach focused on the functional responses of the underlying dependencies.},
doi = {10.1111/gcb.16511},
journal = {Global Change Biology},
number = 4,
volume = 29,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Fri Nov 25 00:00:00 EST 2022},
month = {Fri Nov 25 00:00:00 EST 2022}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16511

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes
journal, September 2016

  • Novick, Kimberly A.; Ficklin, Darren L.; Stoy, Paul C.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate3114

Physiological basis of the light use efficiency model
journal, March 1998


Acclimation and adaptation components of the temperature dependence of plant photosynthesis at the global scale
journal, February 2019

  • Kumarathunge, Dushan P.; Medlyn, Belinda E.; Drake, John E.
  • New Phytologist, Vol. 222, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.15668

Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance: RECONCILING OPTIMAL AND EMPIRICAL STOMATAL MODELS
journal, January 2011


Seasonality of temperate forest photosynthesis and daytime respiration
journal, June 2016

  • Wehr, R.; Munger, J. W.; McManus, J. B.
  • Nature, Vol. 534, Issue 7609
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature17966

Kok Effect and the Quantum Yield of Photosynthesis: Light Partially Inhibits Dark Respiration
journal, May 1984

  • Sharp, Robert E.; Matthews, Mark A.; Boyer, John S.
  • Plant Physiology, Vol. 75, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1104/pp.75.1.95

On the direct effect of clouds and atmospheric particles on the productivity and structure of vegetation
journal, September 2001

  • Roderick, Michael L.; Farquhar, Graham D.; Berry, Sandra L.
  • Oecologia, Vol. 129, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s004420100760

Variation in photosynthetic light-use efficiency in a mountainous tropical rain forest in Indonesia
journal, April 2008


Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002–2017
journal, March 2019


Global photosynthetic capacity is optimized to the environment
journal, January 2019

  • Smith, Nicholas G.; Keenan, Trevor F.; Colin Prentice, I.
  • Ecology Letters, Vol. 22, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/ele.13210

Satellite chlorophyll fluorescence measurements reveal large-scale decoupling of photosynthesis and greenness dynamics in boreal evergreen forests
journal, June 2016

  • Walther, Sophia; Voigt, Maximilian; Thum, Tea
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 22, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13200

Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate
journal, July 2010


Photosynthetic Response and Adaptation to Temperature in Higher Plants
journal, June 1980


The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data
journal, July 2020


Visualization of Regression Models Using visreg
journal, January 2017


A Generalized Relationship between Photosynthetically Active Radiation and Solar Radiation 1
journal, March 1907


Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives
journal, January 2016


Strong thermal acclimation of photosynthesis in tropical and temperate wet-forest tree species: the importance of altered Rubisco content
journal, January 2017

  • Scafaro, Andrew P.; Xiang, Shuang; Long, Benedict M.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 23, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13566

A cross-biome comparison of daily light use efficiency for gross primary production: GPP LIGHT USE EFFICIENCY
journal, March 2003


Contrasting strategies of hydraulic control in two codominant temperate tree species
journal, December 2016

  • Matheny, Ashley M.; Fiorella, Richard P.; Bohrer, Gil
  • Ecohydrology, Vol. 10, Issue 3, Article No. e1815
  • DOI: 10.1002/eco.1815

Parallel adjustments in vegetation greenness and ecosystem CO2 exchange in response to drought in a Southern California chaparral ecosystem
journal, August 2006


Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling
journal, January 2015


Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO 2
journal, October 2020

  • Walker, Anthony P.; De Kauwe, Martin G.; Bastos, Ana
  • New Phytologist
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.16866

When and where soil is important to modify the carbon and water economy of leaves
journal, July 2020

  • Paillassa, Jennifer; Wright, Ian J.; Prentice, I. Colin
  • New Phytologist, Vol. 228, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.16702

On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm
journal, September 2005


In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis: Modelling RuBP-limited photosynthesis
journal, July 2003


Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants
journal, January 1989


Stomatal acclimation to vapour pressure deficit doubles transpiration of small tree seedlings with warming: Stomatal acclimation increases transpiration
journal, August 2016

  • Marchin, Renée M.; Broadhead, Alice A.; Bostic, Laura E.
  • Plant, Cell & Environment, Vol. 39, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1111/pce.12790

What drives the seasonality of photosynthesis across the Amazon basin? A cross-site analysis of eddy flux tower measurements from the Brasil flux network
journal, December 2013


Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models
journal, January 2020


Incorporating diffuse radiation into a light use efficiency and evapotranspiration model: An 11-year study in a high latitude deciduous forest
journal, January 2018


Carbon Dioxide Exchange between an Undisturbed Old-Growth Temperate Forest and the Atmosphere
journal, January 1994

  • Hollinger, D. Y.; Kelliher, F. M.; Byers, J. N.
  • Ecology, Vol. 75, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.2307/1939390

Variation in Crown Light Utilization Characteristics among Tropical Canopy Trees
journal, December 2004


A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models
journal, November 2016

  • Rogers, Alistair; Medlyn, Belinda E.; Dukes, Jeffrey S.
  • New Phytologist, Vol. 213, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.14283

Balancing the costs of carbon gain and water transport: testing a new theoretical framework for plant functional ecology
journal, November 2013

  • Prentice, I. Colin; Dong, Ning; Gleason, Sean M.
  • Ecology Letters, Vol. 17, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/ele.12211

How eddy covariance flux measurements have contributed to our understanding of Global Change Biology
journal, September 2019

  • Baldocchi, Dennis D.
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 26, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14807

Modeling the Terrestrial Biosphere
journal, October 2014


Quantifying soil moisture impacts on light use efficiency across biomes
journal, March 2018

  • Stocker, Benjamin D.; Zscheischler, Jakob; Keenan, Trevor F.
  • New Phytologist, Vol. 218, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.15123

Convergence of terrestrial plant production across global climate gradients
journal, July 2014

  • Michaletz, Sean T.; Cheng, Dongliang; Kerkhoff, Andrew J.
  • Nature, Vol. 512, Issue 7512
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature13470

The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design
journal, January 2013


Plant Physiological Ecology
book, January 2008


Climate and the Efficiency of Crop Production in Britain [and Discussion]
journal, November 1977

  • Monteith, J. L.; Moss, C. J.
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 281, Issue 980
  • DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1977.0140

Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit
journal, March 2020

  • Grossiord, Charlotte; Buckley, Thomas N.; Cernusak, Lucas A.
  • New Phytologist, Vol. 226, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/nph.16485

Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003
journal, March 2007


Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world
journal, March 2015

  • Lin, Yan-Shih; Medlyn, Belinda E.; Duursma, Remko A.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 5, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2550

Solar Radiation and Productivity in Tropical Ecosystems
journal, December 1972

  • Monteith, J. L.
  • The Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.2307/2401901

How should we model plant responses to drought? An analysis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses to water stress
journal, December 2013


Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes
journal, June 2006

  • Turner, David P.; Ritts, William D.; Cohen, Warren B.
  • Remote Sensing of Environment, Vol. 102, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.02.017

How close are we to the temperature tipping point of the terrestrial biosphere?
journal, January 2021

  • Duffy, Katharyn A.; Schwalm, Christopher R.; Arcus, Vickery L.
  • Science Advances, Vol. 7, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay1052

SoilGrids1km — Global Soil Information Based on Automated Mapping
journal, August 2014


A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
journal, June 1980

  • Farquhar, G. D.; von Caemmerer, S.; Berry, J. A.
  • Planta, Vol. 149, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF00386231

Changes in global terrestrial ecosystem water use efficiency are closely related to soil moisture
journal, January 2020