DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: How May the Choice of Downscaling Techniques and Meteorological Reference Observations Affect Future Hydroclimate Projections?

Abstract

Abstract We present an intercomparison of a suite of high‐resolution downscaled climate projections based on a six‐member General Circulation Model (GCM) ensemble from Coupled Models Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The CMIP6 GCMs have been downscaled using dynamical and statistical downscaling techniques based on two meteorological reference observations over the conterminous United States. We use the regional climate model, RegCM4, for dynamical downscaling, double bias correction constructed analogs method for statistical downscaling, and Daymet and Livneh datasets as the reference observations for statistical training and bias‐correction. We evaluate the performances of downscaled data in both historical and future periods under the SSP585 scenario. While dynamical downscaling improves the simulation of some performance evaluation indices, it adds an extra bias in others, highlighting the need for statistical correction before its use in impact assessments. Downscaled datasets after bias‐correction compare exceptionally well with observations. However, the choice of downscaling techniques and the underlying reference observations influence the hydroclimate characteristics of downscaled data. For instance, the statistical downscaling generally preserves the GCMs climate change signal but overestimates the frequency of hot extremes. Similarly, simulated future changes are sensitive to the choice of reference observations, particularly for precipitation extremes that exhibit a higher projected increase inmore » the ensembles trained and/or corrected by Daymet than Livneh. Overall, these results demonstrate that multiple factors, including downscaling techniques and reference observations, can substantially influence the outcome of downscaled climate projections and stress the need for a comprehensive understanding of such method‐based uncertainties.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Computational Sciences and Engineering Division Oak Ridge TN USA
  2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge TN USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Water Power Technologies Office
OSTI Identifier:
1880879
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1883923; OSTI ID: 1996021
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Earth's Future
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Earth's Future Journal Volume: 10 Journal Issue: 8; Journal ID: ISSN 2328-4277
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Rastogi, Deeksha, Kao, Shih‐Chieh, and Ashfaq, Moetasim. How May the Choice of Downscaling Techniques and Meteorological Reference Observations Affect Future Hydroclimate Projections?. United States: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1029/2022EF002734.
Rastogi, Deeksha, Kao, Shih‐Chieh, & Ashfaq, Moetasim. How May the Choice of Downscaling Techniques and Meteorological Reference Observations Affect Future Hydroclimate Projections?. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002734
Rastogi, Deeksha, Kao, Shih‐Chieh, and Ashfaq, Moetasim. Thu . "How May the Choice of Downscaling Techniques and Meteorological Reference Observations Affect Future Hydroclimate Projections?". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002734.
@article{osti_1880879,
title = {How May the Choice of Downscaling Techniques and Meteorological Reference Observations Affect Future Hydroclimate Projections?},
author = {Rastogi, Deeksha and Kao, Shih‐Chieh and Ashfaq, Moetasim},
abstractNote = {Abstract We present an intercomparison of a suite of high‐resolution downscaled climate projections based on a six‐member General Circulation Model (GCM) ensemble from Coupled Models Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The CMIP6 GCMs have been downscaled using dynamical and statistical downscaling techniques based on two meteorological reference observations over the conterminous United States. We use the regional climate model, RegCM4, for dynamical downscaling, double bias correction constructed analogs method for statistical downscaling, and Daymet and Livneh datasets as the reference observations for statistical training and bias‐correction. We evaluate the performances of downscaled data in both historical and future periods under the SSP585 scenario. While dynamical downscaling improves the simulation of some performance evaluation indices, it adds an extra bias in others, highlighting the need for statistical correction before its use in impact assessments. Downscaled datasets after bias‐correction compare exceptionally well with observations. However, the choice of downscaling techniques and the underlying reference observations influence the hydroclimate characteristics of downscaled data. For instance, the statistical downscaling generally preserves the GCMs climate change signal but overestimates the frequency of hot extremes. Similarly, simulated future changes are sensitive to the choice of reference observations, particularly for precipitation extremes that exhibit a higher projected increase in the ensembles trained and/or corrected by Daymet than Livneh. Overall, these results demonstrate that multiple factors, including downscaling techniques and reference observations, can substantially influence the outcome of downscaled climate projections and stress the need for a comprehensive understanding of such method‐based uncertainties.},
doi = {10.1029/2022EF002734},
journal = {Earth's Future},
number = 8,
volume = 10,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Aug 11 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Thu Aug 11 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002734

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Intercomparison of statistical and dynamical downscaling models under the EURO- and MED-CORDEX initiative framework: present climate evaluations
journal, May 2015

  • Vaittinada Ayar, Pradeebane; Vrac, Mathieu; Bastin, Sophie
  • Climate Dynamics, Vol. 46, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00382-015-2647-5

The National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: CCM3*
journal, June 1998


Near-term acceleration of hydroclimatic change in the western U.S.: NEAR-TERM WESTERN US SNOW
journal, October 2013

  • Ashfaq, Moetasim; Ghosh, Subimal; Kao, Shih-Chieh
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50816

Bias in dynamically downscaled rainfall characteristics for hydroclimatic projections
journal, January 2020

  • Potter, Nicholas J.; Chiew, Francis H. S.; Charles, Stephen P.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 24, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-24-2963-2020

Doubling of U.S. Population Exposure to Climate Extremes by 2050
journal, April 2020

  • Batibeniz, Fulden; Ashfaq, Moetasim; Diffenbaugh, Noah S.
  • Earth's Future, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019ef001421

Influence of climate model biases and daily-scale temperature and precipitation events on hydrological impacts assessment: A case study of the United States
journal, January 2010

  • Ashfaq, Moetasim; Bowling, Laura C.; Cherkauer, Keith
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 115, Issue D14
  • DOI: 10.1029/2009jd012965

High-resolution ensemble projections of near-term regional climate over the continental United States: CLIMATE PROJECTIONS OVER THE U.S.
journal, September 2016

  • Ashfaq, Moetasim; Rastogi, Deeksha; Mei, Rui
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 121, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016jd025285

An assessment of differences in gridded precipitation datasets in complex terrain
journal, January 2018


Comparison of statistical and dynamical downscaling results from the WRF model
journal, February 2018


Dynamical and statistical downscaling of seasonal temperature forecasts in Europe: Added value for user applications
journal, January 2018


Dynamical and statistical downscaling of a global seasonal hindcast in eastern Africa
journal, January 2018


Erratum: Inter-comparison of multiple statistically downscaled climate datasets for the Pacific Northwest, USA
journal, March 2018

  • Jiang, Yueyang; Kim, John B.; Still, Christopher J.
  • Scientific Data, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.50

Shift Toward Intense and Widespread Precipitation Events Over the United States by Mid‐21st Century
journal, October 2020

  • Rastogi, Deeksha; Touma, Danielle; Evans, Katherine J.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1029/2020gl089899

Intensification of hot extremes in the United States: INTENSIFICATION OF HOT EXTREMES
journal, August 2010

  • Diffenbaugh, Noah S.; Ashfaq, Moetasim
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 37, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010gl043888

Errors in climate model daily precipitation and temperature output: time invariance and implications for bias correction
journal, January 2013


Simulation of regional-scale water and energy budgets: Representation of subgrid cloud and precipitation processes within RegCM
journal, December 2000

  • Pal, Jeremy S.; Small, Eric E.; Eltahir, Elfatih A. B.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 105, Issue D24
  • DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900415

A spatially comprehensive, hydrometeorological data set for Mexico, the U.S., and Southern Canada 1950–2013
journal, August 2015

  • Livneh, Ben; Bohn, Theodore J.; Pierce, David W.
  • Scientific Data, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2015.42

Utility of daily vs. monthly large-scale climate data: an intercomparison of two statistical downscaling methods
journal, January 2008


The role of soil ice in land-atmosphere coupling over the United States: A soil moisture–precipitation winter feedback mechanism
journal, January 2011

  • Tawfik, Ahmed B.; Steiner, Allison L.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 116, Issue D2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2010JD014333

Technical Note: Bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping
journal, January 2012

  • Thrasher, B.; Maurer, E. P.; McKellar, C.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 16, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-16-3309-2012

Empirical-statistical downscaling in climate modeling
journal, January 2004

  • Benestad, R. E.
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 85, Issue 42
  • DOI: 10.1029/2004eo420002

Bias correction for hydrological impact studies - beyond the daily perspective: INVITED COMMENTARY
journal, June 2014

  • Addor, Nans; Seibert, Jan
  • Hydrological Processes, Vol. 28, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10238

Extreme Climate Event Changes in China in the 1.5 and 2 °C Warmer Climates: Results From Statistical and Dynamical Downscaling
journal, September 2018

  • Li, Donghuan; Zou, Liwei; Zhou, Tianjun
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1029/2018jd028835

An intercomparison of statistical downscaling methods used for water resource assessments in the United States
journal, September 2014

  • Gutmann, Ethan; Pruitt, Tom; Clark, Martyn P.
  • Water Resources Research, Vol. 50, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014wr015559

Extreme hydrological changes in the southwestern US drive reductions in water supply to Southern California by mid century
journal, September 2016


Hydrologic Implications of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches to Downscaling Climate Model Outputs
journal, January 2004


Multisite bias correction of precipitation data from regional climate models: MULTISITE BIAS CORRECTION
journal, October 2016

  • Hnilica, Jan; Hanel, Martin; Puš, Vladimír
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 37, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.4890

Comparison of dynamically and statistically downscaled seasonal climate forecasts for the cold season over the United States: COMPARISON OF DOWNSCALING METHODS
journal, November 2012

  • Yoon, Jin-Ho; Ruby Leung, L.; Correia, James
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D21
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012jd017650

RegCM4: model description and preliminary tests over multiple CORDEX domains
journal, March 2012

  • Giorgi, F.; Coppola, E.; Solmon, F.
  • Climate Research, Vol. 52
  • DOI: 10.3354/cr01018

Regional hydrologic response to climate change in the conterminous United States using high-resolution hydroclimate simulations
journal, August 2016


Improved Bias Correction Techniques for Hydrological Simulations of Climate Change
journal, December 2015

  • Pierce, David W.; Cayan, Daniel R.; Maurer, Edwin P.
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology, Vol. 16, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1175/jhm-d-14-0236.1

An extreme-preserving long-term gridded daily precipitation data set for the conterminous United States
journal, May 2021


An Assessment of High-Resolution Gridded Temperature Datasets over California
journal, May 2018


A High Resolution Air Mass Transformation Model for Short-Range Weather Forecasting
journal, August 1990


Subsampling Impact on the Climate Change Signal over Poland Based on Simulations from Statistical and Dynamical Downscaling
journal, May 2019

  • Mezghani, Abdelkader; Dobler, Andreas; Benestad, Rasmus
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, Vol. 58, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1175/jamc-d-18-0179.1

Hydrologic extremes – an intercomparison of multiple gridded statistical downscaling methods
journal, January 2016


Shift in seasonal climate patterns likely to impact residential energy consumption in the United States
journal, July 2019

  • Rastogi, Deeksha; Holladay, James Scott; Evans, Katherine J.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab22d2

The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California
journal, January 2010

  • Maurer, E. P.; Hidalgo, H. G.; Das, T.
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 14, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/hess-14-1125-2010