DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Regionalized Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Forest Biomass Use for Electricity Generation in the United States

Abstract

This study presents a cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis (LCA) of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the electricity generated from forest biomass in different regions of the United States (U.S.), taking into consideration regional variations in biomass availabilities and logistics. The regional biomass supply for a 20 MW bioelectricity facility is estimated using the Land Use and Resource Allocation (LURA) model. Results from LURA and data on regional forest management, harvesting, and processing are incorporated into the GHGs, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Technologies (GREET) model for LCA. The results suggest that GHG emissions of mill residues-based pathways can be 15-52% lower than those of pulpwood-based pathways, with logging residues falling in between. Nonetheless, our analysis suggests that screening bioenergy projects on specific feedstock types alone is not sufficient because GHG emissions of a pulpwood-based pathway in one state can be lower than those of a mill residue-based pathway in another state. Furthermore, the available biomass supply often consists of several woody feedstocks, and its composition is region-dependent. Forest biomass-derived electricity is associated with 86-93% lower life-cycle GHG emissions than the emissions of the average grid electricity in the U.S. Key factors driving bioelectricity GHG emissions include electricity generationmore » efficiency, transportation distance, and energy use for biomass harvesting and processing.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [1];  [3];  [1]
  1. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Lemont, IL (United States)
  2. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID (United States)
  3. US Dept. of Agriculture (USDA), Washington, DC (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
US Department of Agriculture (USDA)
OSTI Identifier:
1880354
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Environmental Science and Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 55; Journal Issue: 21; Journal ID: ISSN 0013-936X
Publisher:
American Chemical Society (ACS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; forest biomass; electricity; biopower; supply chain; greenhouse gas emissions

Citation Formats

Xu, Hui, Latta, Gregory, Lee, Uisung, Lewandrowski, Jan, and Wang, Michael. Regionalized Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Forest Biomass Use for Electricity Generation in the United States. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04301.
Xu, Hui, Latta, Gregory, Lee, Uisung, Lewandrowski, Jan, & Wang, Michael. Regionalized Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Forest Biomass Use for Electricity Generation in the United States. United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04301
Xu, Hui, Latta, Gregory, Lee, Uisung, Lewandrowski, Jan, and Wang, Michael. Fri . "Regionalized Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Forest Biomass Use for Electricity Generation in the United States". United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04301. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1880354.
@article{osti_1880354,
title = {Regionalized Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Forest Biomass Use for Electricity Generation in the United States},
author = {Xu, Hui and Latta, Gregory and Lee, Uisung and Lewandrowski, Jan and Wang, Michael},
abstractNote = {This study presents a cradle-to-grave life cycle analysis (LCA) of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of the electricity generated from forest biomass in different regions of the United States (U.S.), taking into consideration regional variations in biomass availabilities and logistics. The regional biomass supply for a 20 MW bioelectricity facility is estimated using the Land Use and Resource Allocation (LURA) model. Results from LURA and data on regional forest management, harvesting, and processing are incorporated into the GHGs, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Technologies (GREET) model for LCA. The results suggest that GHG emissions of mill residues-based pathways can be 15-52% lower than those of pulpwood-based pathways, with logging residues falling in between. Nonetheless, our analysis suggests that screening bioenergy projects on specific feedstock types alone is not sufficient because GHG emissions of a pulpwood-based pathway in one state can be lower than those of a mill residue-based pathway in another state. Furthermore, the available biomass supply often consists of several woody feedstocks, and its composition is region-dependent. Forest biomass-derived electricity is associated with 86-93% lower life-cycle GHG emissions than the emissions of the average grid electricity in the U.S. Key factors driving bioelectricity GHG emissions include electricity generation efficiency, transportation distance, and energy use for biomass harvesting and processing.},
doi = {10.1021/acs.est.1c04301},
journal = {Environmental Science and Technology},
number = 21,
volume = 55,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Fri Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Logging residue supply and costs for electricity generation: Potential variability and policy considerations
journal, May 2018


A Life-Cycle Assessment of Forest Resources of the Pacific Northwest, USA*
journal, September 2017


Are wood pellets a green fuel?
journal, March 2018


Coal-to-biomass retrofit in Alberta –value of forest residue bioenergy in the electricity system
journal, September 2018


Life cycle human health and ecotoxicological impacts assessment of electricity production from wood biomass compared to coal fuel
journal, February 2017


Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Bioenergy Production from Different Wood Pellet Supply Chains
journal, October 2020

  • Sgarbossa, Andrea; Boschiero, Martina; Pierobon, Francesca
  • Forests, Vol. 11, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.3390/f11111127

A systems approach to assess climate change mitigation options in landscapes of the United States forest sector
journal, September 2018

  • Dugan, Alexa J.; Birdsey, Richard; Mascorro, Vanessa S.
  • Carbon Balance and Management, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13021-018-0100-x

Carbon debt and payback time – Lost in the forest?
journal, June 2017


Not carbon neutral: Assessing the net emissions impact of residues burned for bioenergy
journal, February 2018


Dynamic life-cycle carbon analysis for fast pyrolysis biofuel produced from pine residues: implications of carbon temporal effects
journal, September 2021


Socioeconomic Constraints to Biomass Removal from Forest Lands for Fire Risk Reduction in the Western U.S.
journal, May 2018

  • Nicholls, David; Halbrook, Jeffrey; Benedum, Michelle
  • Forests, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.3390/f9050264

Co-benefits of utilizing logging residues for bioenergy production: The case for East Texas, USA
journal, September 2007


Life cycle assessment of forest biomass energy feedstock in the Northeast United States
journal, July 2020

  • Quinn, Ryan J.; Ha, HakSoo; Volk, Timothy A.
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 12, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12725

Life-cycle impact and exergy based resource use assessment of torrefied and non-torrefied briquette use for heat and electricity generation
journal, October 2019


A Land Use and Resource Allocation (LURA) modeling system for projecting localized forest CO 2 effects of alternative macroeconomic futures
journal, February 2018


Life cycle assessment of co-firing coal and wood pellets in the Southeastern United States
journal, May 2017


A multi-sector intertemporal optimization approach to assess the GHG implications of U.S. forest and agricultural biomass electricity expansion
journal, December 2013

  • Latta, Gregory S.; Baker, Justin S.; Beach, Robert H.
  • Journal of Forest Economics, Vol. 19, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2013.05.003

Availability of Logging Residues and Likelihood of Their Utilization for Electricity Production in the US South
journal, August 2019

  • Pokharel, Raju; Grala, Robert K.; Latta, Gregory S.
  • Journal of Forestry, Vol. 117, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1093/jofore/fvz047

Does replacing coal with wood lower CO 2 emissions? Dynamic lifecycle analysis of wood bioenergy
journal, December 2017

  • Sterman, John D.; Siegel, Lori; Rooney-Varga, Juliette N.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa512

Economic evaluation of a roll-off trucking system removing forest biomass resulting from shaded fuelbreak treatments
journal, July 2010


Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States
journal, November 2006


Spatial and temporal quantification of forest residue volumes and delivered costs
journal, June 2016

  • Wells, Lucas A.; Chung, Woodam; Anderson, Nathaniel M.
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 46, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0451

Life cycle assessment of biochar produced from forest residues using portable systems
journal, March 2020


Climate impact potential of utilizing forest residues for bioenergy in Norway
journal, July 2012

  • Guest, Geoffrey; Cherubini, Francesco; Strømman, Anders Hammer
  • Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 18, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11027-012-9409-z

Estimating unit production cost, carbon intensity, and carbon abatement cost of electricity generation from bioenergy feedstocks in Georgia, United States
journal, January 2020

  • Masum, Md Farhad Hossain; Dwivedi, Puneet; Anderson, William F.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 117
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109514

Life-cycle assessment of forest harvesting and transportation operations in Tennessee
journal, March 2018


Life cycle assessment of forest-based biomass for bioenergy: A case study in British Columbia, Canada
journal, July 2019


The health impacts and economic value of wildland fire episodes in the U.S.: 2008–2012
journal, January 2018


Forest treatment residues for thermal energy compared with disposal by onsite burning: Emissions and energy return
journal, May 2010


Life cycle assessment demonstrates environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of low-carbon electricity supply options
journal, September 2017

  • Gibon, Thomas; Arvesen, Anders; Hertwich, Edgar G.
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 76
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.078