White paper on light sterile neutrino searches and related phenomenology
[1];
[2];
[3];
[5];
[6];
[7];
[8];
[7];
[4];
[9];
[10];
[11];
[13];
more »
- U. Atlantico, Barranquilla
- Harvard U., Phys. Dept.
- Minnesota U.; Minnesota U., Theor. Phys. Inst.; Perimeter Inst. Theor. Phys.
- Columbia U.
- CERN
- IIT, Chicago
- Fermilab
- Indiana U., Bloomington (main)
- Cincinnati U.
- Yale U.
- New South Wales U.
- Cairo U.
- Fermilab; Durham U., IPPP
- TRIUMF
- Valencia U., IFIC; Valencia U.
- Los Alamos
- Wisconsin U., Madison
- UC, Berkeley; Washington U., Seattle
- ICC, Barcelona U.
- Marseille, CPPM
- Royal Inst. Tech., Stockholm; Madrid, Autonoma U.; Stockholm U., OKC
- U. Paris-Saclay
- U. Hawaii (main)
- Adelaide U.
- MIT
- Brookhaven
- Madrid, Autonoma U.
- ABC Federal U.
- Medellin U.
- KEK, Tsukuba; J-PARC
- Harvard U., Phys. Dept.; Valencia U., IFIC; Valencia U.
- Paris U., VI-VII
- INFN, Turin
- Harish-Chandra Res. Inst.
- Hyderabad U.
- Tokyo U. of Sci., Noda Campus
- Imperial Coll., London; Moscow, INR
- Texas U., Arlington
- Michigan U.
- King's Coll. London (main)
- Sungkyunkwan U.
- Houston U.
- INFN, Padua
- Colorado School of Mines
- Beijing, Inst. High Energy Phys.; Beijing, GUCAS
- Virginia Tech.
- Michigan State U., East Lansing (main)
- Princeton U. (main)
- North Carolina Central U.
- KEK, Tsukuba
- Munich, Max Planck Inst.; Munich, Tech. U.
- Penn State U.
- Colorado State U., Fort Collins
- Rio de Janeiro, Pont. U. Catol.
- UC, Irvine
- IBS, Daejeon
- Stockholm U., OKC; Royal Inst. Tech., Stockholm
- Dortmund U.
- Duke U.
- U. Washington, Seattle (main)
- IJCLab, Orsay
- Sungkyunkwan U.; Utah U.
- Bhubaneswar, Inst. Phys.
- Imperial Coll., London
- UC, Berkeley; LBNL, Berkeley
- Stefan Inst., Ljubljana
- Texas A-M
- Tokyo U.
- Kyoto U.; Tokyo U., IPMU
- Colorado State U.
- Seoul Natl. U., Dept. Phys. Astron.
- PINSTECH, Islamabad
- Colombia, U. Natl.
- Pamplona U.
- LLNL, Livermore
- UC, Santa Barbara
- Unlisted, TW
- SLAC
- Mississippi U.
- Cambridge U.
- Argonne
- Charles U., Inst. Theor. Phys.
- U. Manchester (main)
- Munich, Tech. U.
- Granada U.; CAFPE, Granada
- Boston U.
- Goias U.
- Unlisted, US
- Korea Inst. Advanced Study, Seoul
- Bologna U.; INFN, Bologna
- Sheffield U.
- Edinburgh U.
- Virginia Tech.; Purdue U.
- Moscow, INR; Dubna, JINR
- Temple U.
- Bologna U.; Louvain U., CP3; Michigan U.
- Rutgers U., Piscataway (main)
- NIST, Wash., D.C.
- Drexel U.
- UC, San Diego (main)
- Florida U.
- Wayne State U.
- Wayne State U.; South Carolina U.
- Hebrew U.
- Charles U.
- Chicago U., EFI
- DESY
- Mainz U.; U. Mainz, PRISMA; Munich, Tech. U.
- Parana U.
- Tokyo U., IPMU
- Indiana U.
- Zhengzhou U.
- UC, Berkeley
This white paper provides a comprehensive review of our present understanding of experimental neutrino anomalies that remain unresolved, charting the progress achieved over the last decade at the experimental and phenomenological level, and sets the stage for future programmatic prospects in addressing those anomalies. It is purposed to serve as a guiding and motivational "encyclopedic" reference, with emphasis on needs and options for future exploration that may lead to the ultimate resolution of the anomalies. We see the main experimental, analysis, and theory-driven thrusts that will be essential to achieving this goal being: 1) Cover all anomaly sectors -- given the unresolved nature of all four canonical anomalies, it is imperative to support all pillars of a diverse experimental portfolio, source, reactor, decay-at-rest, decay-in-flight, and other methods/sources, to provide complementary probes of and increased precision for new physics explanations; 2) Pursue diverse signatures -- it is imperative that experiments make design and analysis choices that maximize sensitivity to as broad an array of these potential new physics signatures as possible; 3) Deepen theoretical engagement -- priority in the theory community should be placed on development of standard and beyond standard models relevant to all four short-baseline anomalies and the development of tools for efficient tests of these models with existing and future experimental datasets; 4) Openly share data -- Fluid communication between the experimental and theory communities will be required, which implies that both experimental data releases and theoretical calculations should be publicly available; and 5) Apply robust analysis techniques -- Appropriate statistical treatment is crucial to assess the compatibility of data sets within the context of any given model.
- Research Organization:
- ABC Federal U.; Adelaide U.; Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); Beijing, GUCAS; Beijing, Inst. High Energy Phys.; Bhubaneswar, Inst. Phys.; Bologna U.; Boston U.; Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States); CAFPE, Granada; CERN; Cairo U.; Cambridge U.; Charles U.; Charles U., Inst. Theor. Phys.; Chicago U., EFI; Cincinnati U.; Colombia, U. Natl.; Colorado School of Mines; Colorado State U.; Colorado State U., Fort Collins; Columbia U.; DESY; Dortmund U.; Drexel U.; Dubna, JINR; Duke U.; Durham U., IPPP; Edinburgh U.; Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Florida U.; Goias U.; Granada U.; Harish-Chandra Res. Inst.; Harvard U., Phys. Dept.; Hebrew U.; Houston U.; Hyderabad U.; IBS, Daejeon; ICC, Barcelona U.; IIT, Chicago; IJCLab, Orsay; INFN, Bologna; INFN, Padua; INFN, Turin; Imperial Coll., London; Indiana U.; Indiana U., Bloomington (main); J-PARC; KEK, Tsukuba; King's Coll. London (main); Korea Inst. Advanced Study, Seoul; Kyoto U.; LBNL, Berkeley; Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); Louvain U., CP3; MIT; Madrid, Autonoma U.; Mainz U.; Marseille, CPPM; Medellin U.; Michigan State U., East Lansing (main); Michigan U.; Minnesota U.; Minnesota U., Theor. Phys. Inst.; Mississippi U.; Moscow, INR; Munich, Max Planck Inst.; Munich, Tech. U.; NIST, Wash., D.C.; New South Wales U.; North Carolina Central U.; PINSTECH, Islamabad; Pamplona U.; Parana U.; Paris U., VI-VII; Penn State U.; Perimeter Inst. Theor. Phys.; Princeton U. (main); Purdue U.; Rio de Janeiro, Pont. U. Catol.; Royal Inst. Tech., Stockholm; Rutgers U., Piscataway (main); SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States); Seoul Natl. U., Dept. Phys. Astron.; Sheffield U.; South Carolina U.; Stefan Inst., Ljubljana; Stockholm U., OKC; Sungkyunkwan U.; TRIUMF; Temple U.; Texas A-M; Texas U., Arlington; Tokyo U.; Tokyo U. of Sci., Noda Campus; Tokyo U., IPMU; U. Atlantico, Barranquilla; U. Hawaii (main); U. Mainz, PRISMA; U. Manchester (main); U. Paris-Saclay; U. Washington, Seattle (main); UC, Berkeley; UC, Irvine; UC, San Diego (main); UC, Santa Barbara; Unlisted, TW; Unlisted, US; Utah U.; Valencia U.; Valencia U., IFIC; Virginia Tech.; Washington U., Seattle; Wayne State U.; Wisconsin U., Madison; Yale U.; Zhengzhou U.
- Sponsoring Organization:
- US Department of Energy; USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC02-05CH11231; AC02-07CH11359
- OSTI ID:
- 1873691
- Report Number(s):
- FERMILAB-PUB-22-318-ND-SCD-T; oai:inspirehep.net:2051352; arXiv:2203.07323
- Journal Information:
- J.Phys.G, Journal Name: J.Phys.G
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
The superchips are here, but how to test them
Persistent anomaly forcing in a two-level global circulation model