DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A framework to quantify mass flow and assess food loss and waste in the US food supply chain

Abstract

Abstract Reducing food loss and waste can improve the efficiency of food supply chains and provide food security. Here we estimate mass flow as well as food loss and waste along the US food supply chain for 10 commodity groups and nine management pathways to provide a baseline for designing efficient strategies to reduce, recycle, and recover food loss and waste. We estimate a total food loss and waste of 335.4 million metric tonnes from the U.S. food supply chain in 2016. Water evaporation (19%), recycling (55%), and landfill, incineration, or wastewater treatment (23%) accounted for most of the loss and waste. The consumption stage accounted for 57% of the food loss and waste disposed of through landfill, incineration, or wastewater treatment. Manufacturing was the largest contributor to food loss and waste (61%) but had a high recycling rate. High demand, perishable products accounted for 67% of food waste. We suggest that funding for infrastructure and incentives for earlier food donation can promote efficiency and sustainability of the supply chain, promote FLW collection and recycling along the U.S. FSC, and improve consumer education in order to move towards a circular economy.

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1861231
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1864451
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Communications Earth & Environment
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Communications Earth & Environment Journal Volume: 3 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2662-4435
Publisher:
Nature Publishing Group
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; environmental impact; sustainability

Citation Formats

Dong, Wenquan, Armstrong, Kristina, Jin, Mingzhou, Nimbalkar, Sachin, Guo, Wei, Zhuang, Jie, and Cresko, Joe. A framework to quantify mass flow and assess food loss and waste in the US food supply chain. United Kingdom: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.1038/s43247-022-00414-9.
Dong, Wenquan, Armstrong, Kristina, Jin, Mingzhou, Nimbalkar, Sachin, Guo, Wei, Zhuang, Jie, & Cresko, Joe. A framework to quantify mass flow and assess food loss and waste in the US food supply chain. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00414-9
Dong, Wenquan, Armstrong, Kristina, Jin, Mingzhou, Nimbalkar, Sachin, Guo, Wei, Zhuang, Jie, and Cresko, Joe. Tue . "A framework to quantify mass flow and assess food loss and waste in the US food supply chain". United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00414-9.
@article{osti_1861231,
title = {A framework to quantify mass flow and assess food loss and waste in the US food supply chain},
author = {Dong, Wenquan and Armstrong, Kristina and Jin, Mingzhou and Nimbalkar, Sachin and Guo, Wei and Zhuang, Jie and Cresko, Joe},
abstractNote = {Abstract Reducing food loss and waste can improve the efficiency of food supply chains and provide food security. Here we estimate mass flow as well as food loss and waste along the US food supply chain for 10 commodity groups and nine management pathways to provide a baseline for designing efficient strategies to reduce, recycle, and recover food loss and waste. We estimate a total food loss and waste of 335.4 million metric tonnes from the U.S. food supply chain in 2016. Water evaporation (19%), recycling (55%), and landfill, incineration, or wastewater treatment (23%) accounted for most of the loss and waste. The consumption stage accounted for 57% of the food loss and waste disposed of through landfill, incineration, or wastewater treatment. Manufacturing was the largest contributor to food loss and waste (61%) but had a high recycling rate. High demand, perishable products accounted for 67% of food waste. We suggest that funding for infrastructure and incentives for earlier food donation can promote efficiency and sustainability of the supply chain, promote FLW collection and recycling along the U.S. FSC, and improve consumer education in order to move towards a circular economy.},
doi = {10.1038/s43247-022-00414-9},
journal = {Communications Earth & Environment},
number = 1,
volume = 3,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Tue Apr 05 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Tue Apr 05 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions
journal, May 2012

  • Reay, Dave S.; Davidson, Eric A.; Smith, Keith A.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 2, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1458

Relationship between food waste, diet quality, and environmental sustainability
journal, April 2018


Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits
journal, October 2018


Assessing U.S. food wastage and opportunities for reduction
journal, March 2016


The urgency of food system transformation is now irrefutable
journal, September 2020


Impacts and costs of embodied and nutritional energy of food waste in the US food system: Distribution and consumption (Part B)
journal, April 2020


Nutritional and environmental losses embedded in global food waste
journal, September 2020


Impact of Optimized Packaging on Food Waste Prevention Potential among Consumers
journal, April 2021

  • Obersteiner, Gudrun; Cociancig, Marta; Luck, Sandra
  • Sustainability, Vol. 13, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.3390/su13084209

Impacts and costs of embodied and nutritional energy of food losses in the US food system: farming and processing (Part A)
journal, January 2020


Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: a mass flow analysis
journal, October 2019


Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging
journal, March 2012


The Estimated Amount, Value, and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States
journal, January 2014

  • Buzby, Jean C.; Farah-Wells, Hodan; Hyman, Jeffrey
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2501659

Material Flow Analysis as a Decision Support Tool for Waste Management: A Literature Review: MFA for Waste Management: A Literature Review
journal, September 2015

  • Allesch, Astrid; Brunner, Paul H.
  • Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 19, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12354

Quantifying food losses and the potential for reduction in Switzerland
journal, March 2013


Wasted Food, Wasted Energy: The Embedded Energy in Food Waste in the United States
journal, August 2010

  • Cuéllar, Amanda D.; Webber, Michael E.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1021/es100310d

An assessment of individual foodprints attributed to diets and food waste in the United States
journal, October 2017

  • Birney, Catherine I.; Franklin, Katy F.; Davidson, F. Todd
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8494

Climate Change and Food Systems
journal, November 2012


The science of food security
journal, August 2018

  • Cole, Martin Barry; Augustin, Mary Ann; Robertson, Michael John
  • npj Science of Food, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41538-018-0021-9

Review of the sustainability of food systems and transition using the Internet of Food
journal, October 2018

  • Holden, Nicholas M.; White, Eoin P.; Lange, Matthew. C.
  • npj Science of Food, Vol. 2, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41538-018-0027-3

Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector
journal, March 2016

  • Herrero, Mario; Henderson, Benjamin; Havlík, Petr
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2925