DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Validation of wind resource and energy production simulations for small wind turbines in the United States

Abstract

Due to financial and temporal limitations, the small wind community relies upon simplified wind speed models and energy production simulation tools to assess site suitability and produce energy generation expectations. While efficient and user-friendly, these models and tools are subject to errors that have been insufficiently quantified at small wind turbine heights. This study leverages observations from meteorological towers and sodars across the United States to validate wind speed estimates from the Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5), and the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), revealing average biases within ±0.5 m s-1 at small wind hub heights. Observations from small wind turbines across the United States provide references for validating energy production estimates from the System Advisor Model (SAM), Wind Report, MyWindTurbine.com, and Global Wind Atlas 3 (GWA3), which are seen to overestimate actual annual capacity factors by 2.5, 4.2, 11.5, and 7.3 percentage points, respectively. In addition to quantifying the error metrics, this paper identifies sources of model and tool discrepancies, noting that interannual fluctuation in the wind resource, wind speed class, and loss assumptions produces more variability in estimates than different horizontal andmore » vertical interpolation techniques. The results of this study provide small wind installers and owners with information about these challenges to consider when making performance estimates and thus possible adjustments accordingly. Looking to the future, recognizing these error metrics and sources of discrepancies provides model and tool researchers and developers with opportunities for product improvement that could positively impact small wind customer confidence and the ability to finance small wind projects.« less

Authors:
; ; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1856545
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1860228; OSTI ID: 1865325
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-166869; NREL/JA-2C00-82742
Journal ID: ISSN 2366-7451
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-76RL01830; AC36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Wind Energy Science (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Wind Energy Science (Online) Journal Volume: 7 Journal Issue: 2; Journal ID: ISSN 2366-7451
Publisher:
Copernicus GmbH
Country of Publication:
Germany
Language:
English
Subject:
17 WIND ENERGY

Citation Formats

Sheridan, Lindsay M., Phillips, Caleb, Orrell, Alice C., Berg, Larry K., Tinnesand, Heidi, Rai, Raj K., Zisman, Sagi, Duplyakin, Dmitry, and Flaherty, Julia E. Validation of wind resource and energy production simulations for small wind turbines in the United States. Germany: N. p., 2022. Web. doi:10.5194/wes-7-659-2022.
Sheridan, Lindsay M., Phillips, Caleb, Orrell, Alice C., Berg, Larry K., Tinnesand, Heidi, Rai, Raj K., Zisman, Sagi, Duplyakin, Dmitry, & Flaherty, Julia E. Validation of wind resource and energy production simulations for small wind turbines in the United States. Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022
Sheridan, Lindsay M., Phillips, Caleb, Orrell, Alice C., Berg, Larry K., Tinnesand, Heidi, Rai, Raj K., Zisman, Sagi, Duplyakin, Dmitry, and Flaherty, Julia E. Thu . "Validation of wind resource and energy production simulations for small wind turbines in the United States". Germany. https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022.
@article{osti_1856545,
title = {Validation of wind resource and energy production simulations for small wind turbines in the United States},
author = {Sheridan, Lindsay M. and Phillips, Caleb and Orrell, Alice C. and Berg, Larry K. and Tinnesand, Heidi and Rai, Raj K. and Zisman, Sagi and Duplyakin, Dmitry and Flaherty, Julia E.},
abstractNote = {Due to financial and temporal limitations, the small wind community relies upon simplified wind speed models and energy production simulation tools to assess site suitability and produce energy generation expectations. While efficient and user-friendly, these models and tools are subject to errors that have been insufficiently quantified at small wind turbine heights. This study leverages observations from meteorological towers and sodars across the United States to validate wind speed estimates from the Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5), and the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), revealing average biases within ±0.5 m s-1 at small wind hub heights. Observations from small wind turbines across the United States provide references for validating energy production estimates from the System Advisor Model (SAM), Wind Report, MyWindTurbine.com, and Global Wind Atlas 3 (GWA3), which are seen to overestimate actual annual capacity factors by 2.5, 4.2, 11.5, and 7.3 percentage points, respectively. In addition to quantifying the error metrics, this paper identifies sources of model and tool discrepancies, noting that interannual fluctuation in the wind resource, wind speed class, and loss assumptions produces more variability in estimates than different horizontal and vertical interpolation techniques. The results of this study provide small wind installers and owners with information about these challenges to consider when making performance estimates and thus possible adjustments accordingly. Looking to the future, recognizing these error metrics and sources of discrepancies provides model and tool researchers and developers with opportunities for product improvement that could positively impact small wind customer confidence and the ability to finance small wind projects.},
doi = {10.5194/wes-7-659-2022},
journal = {Wind Energy Science (Online)},
number = 2,
volume = 7,
place = {Germany},
year = {Thu Mar 24 00:00:00 EDT 2022},
month = {Thu Mar 24 00:00:00 EDT 2022}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-7-659-2022

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

The WRF Model Forecast-Derived Low-Level Wind Shear Climatology over the United States Great Plains
journal, February 2010


Assessment of wind energy potential using reanalysis data: A comparison with mast measurements
journal, September 2021


The Wind Forecast Improvement Project (WFIP): A Public–Private Partnership Addressing Wind Energy Forecast Needs
journal, October 2015

  • Wilczak, James; Finley, Cathy; Freedman, Jeff
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 96, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00107.1

Recognition of and response to energy poverty in the United States
journal, March 2020


Evaluation of wind speed estimates in reanalyses for wind energy applications
journal, January 2021

  • Brune, Sebastian; Keller, Jan D.; Wahl, Sabrina
  • Advances in Science and Research, Vol. 18
  • DOI: 10.5194/asr-18-115-2021

The ERA5 global reanalysis
journal, June 2020

  • Hersbach, Hans; Bell, Bill; Berrisford, Paul
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 146, Issue 730
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.3803

Quality of wind characteristics in recent wind atlases over the North Sea
journal, February 2020

  • Kalverla, Peter C.; Holtslag, Albert A. M.; Ronda, Reinder J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 146, Issue 728
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.3748

Assessment of surface wind datasets for estimating offshore wind energy along the Central California Coast
journal, April 2019


Copernicus Global Land Cover Layers—Collection 2
journal, March 2020

  • Buchhorn, Marcel; Lesiv, Myroslava; Tsendbazar, Nandin-Erdene
  • Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.3390/rs12061044

System advisor model (SAM) simulation modelling of a concentrating solar thermal power plant with comparison to actual performance data
journal, January 2018


Wind climate estimation using WRF model output: method and model sensitivities over the sea: Offshore wind climate estimation using WRF output
journal, December 2014

  • Hahmann, Andrea N.; Vincent, Claire L.; Peña, Alfredo
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 35, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.4217

Distributed Wind Resource Assessment for Small, Kilowatt-Sized Wind Turbines using Computational Flow Modeling Software
journal, January 2020


The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit
journal, August 2015


ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling?
journal, October 2018


An Evaluation of Advanced Tools for Distributed Wind Turbine Performance Estimation
journal, January 2020


The importance of accurate wind resource assessment for evaluating the economic viability of small wind turbines
journal, May 2015


Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney or t-test? On assumptions for hypothesis tests and multiple interpretations of decision rules
journal, January 2010

  • Fay, Michael P.; Proschan, Michael A.
  • Statistics Surveys, Vol. 4, Issue 0
  • DOI: 10.1214/09-SS051

The Diurnal Wind Variation in the Lowest 1500 ft in Central Oklahoma. June 1966–May 1967
journal, February 1973


An Assessment of NASA’s GMAO MERRA-2 Reanalysis Surface Winds
journal, November 2019


Effects of climate oscillations on wind resource variability in the United States
journal, January 2015

  • Hamlington, B. D.; Hamlington, P. E.; Collins, S. G.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014GL062370

Comparison of ERA5 surface wind speed climatologies over Europe with observations from the HadISD dataset
journal, March 2021

  • Molina, María O.; Gutiérrez, Claudia; Sánchez, Enrique
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 41, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.7103

A global assessment of extreme wind speeds for wind energy applications
journal, January 2021


Renewable energy analysis in indigenous communities using bottom-up demand prediction
journal, August 2021

  • Fathollahzadeh, Mohammad Hassan; Speake, Andrew; Tabares-Velasco, Paulo Cesar
  • Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 71
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102932

What global reanalysis best represents near‐surface winds?
journal, August 2019

  • Ramon, Jaume; Lledó, Llorenç; Torralba, Verónica
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 145, Issue 724
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.3616

The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2)
journal, July 2017


Evaluation of ERA5, MERRA-2, COSMO-REA6, NEWA and AROME to simulate wind power production over France
journal, January 2020


Modelling the Swedish wind power production using MERRA reanalysis data
journal, April 2015


Can reanalysis products outperform mesoscale numerical weather prediction models in modeling the wind resource in simple terrain?
journal, January 2022

  • Pronk, Vincent; Bodini, Nicola; Optis, Mike
  • Wind Energy Science, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/wes-7-487-2022