DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: How Useful are Conventional I–Vs for Performance Calibration of Single- and Two-Junction Perovskite Solar Cells? A Statistical Analysis of Performance Data on ≈200 Cells from 30 Global Sources

Abstract

As perovskite photovoltaics (PV) advance from the laboratory to commercial prototypes, their accurate and reliable performance testing is becoming increasingly important. The well‐documented dynamic response of perovskite solar cells to an external applied voltage has led to the development of steady‐state performance measurement methods; however, these methods have not been widely adopted by the perovskite PV community. A key reason for this is that steady‐state measurement methods take tens of minutes to complete, as opposed to conventional “fast” current–voltage ( I – V ) measurements usually lasting a few seconds. Fast I – V s arise from a snapshot, almost always not a steady‐state condition of the device; however, given their widespread use, the question arises: how do performance parameters of perovskite PV compare when measured with fast I – V and with a steady‐state method? Results compiled from approximately 200 perovskite PV cells, including single junction, and two‐terminal perovskite–perovskite and perovskite–Si tandems, show that fast I – V s can provide a useful measure of the open‐circuit voltage of the devices, while the short‐circuit current and the overall efficiency can be widely misestimated. The implications of these findings on performance testing protocols are discussed and possible options for fastmore » and accurate testing of perovskite PV are proposed.« less

Authors:
 [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Solar Energy Technologies Office
OSTI Identifier:
1837977
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1834217
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5900-81278
Journal ID: ISSN 2367-198X; MainId:82051;UUID:6a6a60c7-5442-4b53-bd91-13a0d1311820;MainAdminID:63498
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC36-08GO28308; 34351
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Solar RRL
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 6; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2367-198X
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
14 SOLAR ENERGY; linear regression analysis; performance calibration; perovskites; single and two-junction solar cells; tandem cells

Citation Formats

Song, Tao, Friedman, Daniel J., and Kopidakis, Nikos. How Useful are Conventional I–Vs for Performance Calibration of Single- and Two-Junction Perovskite Solar Cells? A Statistical Analysis of Performance Data on ≈200 Cells from 30 Global Sources. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.1002/solr.202100867.
Song, Tao, Friedman, Daniel J., & Kopidakis, Nikos. How Useful are Conventional I–Vs for Performance Calibration of Single- and Two-Junction Perovskite Solar Cells? A Statistical Analysis of Performance Data on ≈200 Cells from 30 Global Sources. United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202100867
Song, Tao, Friedman, Daniel J., and Kopidakis, Nikos. Thu . "How Useful are Conventional I–Vs for Performance Calibration of Single- and Two-Junction Perovskite Solar Cells? A Statistical Analysis of Performance Data on ≈200 Cells from 30 Global Sources". United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.202100867. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1837977.
@article{osti_1837977,
title = {How Useful are Conventional I–Vs for Performance Calibration of Single- and Two-Junction Perovskite Solar Cells? A Statistical Analysis of Performance Data on ≈200 Cells from 30 Global Sources},
author = {Song, Tao and Friedman, Daniel J. and Kopidakis, Nikos},
abstractNote = {As perovskite photovoltaics (PV) advance from the laboratory to commercial prototypes, their accurate and reliable performance testing is becoming increasingly important. The well‐documented dynamic response of perovskite solar cells to an external applied voltage has led to the development of steady‐state performance measurement methods; however, these methods have not been widely adopted by the perovskite PV community. A key reason for this is that steady‐state measurement methods take tens of minutes to complete, as opposed to conventional “fast” current–voltage ( I – V ) measurements usually lasting a few seconds. Fast I – V s arise from a snapshot, almost always not a steady‐state condition of the device; however, given their widespread use, the question arises: how do performance parameters of perovskite PV compare when measured with fast I – V and with a steady‐state method? Results compiled from approximately 200 perovskite PV cells, including single junction, and two‐terminal perovskite–perovskite and perovskite–Si tandems, show that fast I – V s can provide a useful measure of the open‐circuit voltage of the devices, while the short‐circuit current and the overall efficiency can be widely misestimated. The implications of these findings on performance testing protocols are discussed and possible options for fast and accurate testing of perovskite PV are proposed.},
doi = {10.1002/solr.202100867},
journal = {Solar RRL},
number = 1,
volume = 6,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Nov 25 00:00:00 EST 2021},
month = {Thu Nov 25 00:00:00 EST 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 58)
journal, June 2021

  • Green, Martin A.; Dunlop, Ewan D.; Hohl‐Ebinger, Jochen
  • Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 29, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/pip.3444

Challenges for commercializing perovskite solar cells
journal, September 2018


Anomalous Hysteresis in Perovskite Solar Cells
journal, April 2014

  • Snaith, Henry J.; Abate, Antonio; Ball, James M.
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, Vol. 5, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1021/jz500113x

Hysteresis and transient behavior in current–voltage measurements of hybrid-perovskite absorber solar cells
journal, January 2014

  • Unger, E. L.; Hoke, E. T.; Bailie, C. D.
  • Energy Environ. Sci., Vol. 7, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1039/C4EE02465F

How reliable are efficiency measurements of perovskite solar cells? The first inter-comparison, between two accredited and eight non-accredited laboratories
journal, January 2017

  • Dunbar, Ricky B.; Duck, Benjamin C.; Moriarty, Tom
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry A, Vol. 5, Issue 43
  • DOI: 10.1039/C7TA05609E

Comprehensive Performance Calibration Guidance for Perovskites and Other Emerging Solar Cells
journal, May 2021

  • Song, Tao; Friedman, Daniel J.; Kopidakis, Nikos
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 11, Issue 23
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202100728

Metastability in performance measurements of perovskite PV devices: a systematic approach *
journal, March 2021

  • Bardizza, Giorgio; Müllejans, Harald; Pavanello, Diego
  • Journal of Physics: Energy, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/2515-7655/abd678

Characterization of perovskite solar cells: Towards a reliable measurement protocol
journal, September 2016

  • Zimmermann, Eugen; Wong, Ka Kan; Müller, Michael
  • APL Materials, Vol. 4, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1063/1.4960759

Hill climbing hysteresis of perovskite-based solar cells: a maximum power point tracking investigation: Maximum power point tracking of perovskite-based solar cells
journal, June 2017

  • Pellet, Norman; Giordano, Fabrizio; Ibrahim Dar, M.
  • Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 25, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1002/pip.2894

NREL's Cell and Module Performance group's asymptotic Pmax protocol for perovskite devices
conference, June 2017

  • Moriarty, Tom; Levi, Dean
  • 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC)
  • DOI: 10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366424

Reliable Power Rating of Perovskite PV Modules
conference, June 2021