DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Marine ice sheet experiments with the Community Ice Sheet Model

Abstract

Ice sheet models differ in their numerical treatment of dynamical processes. Simulations of marine-based ice are sensitive to the choice of Stokes flow approximation and basal friction law and to the treatment of stresses and melt rates near the grounding line. We study the effects of these numerical choices on marine ice sheet dynamics in the Community Ice Sheet Model (CISM). In the framework of the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project 3d (MISMIP3d), we show that a depth-integrated, higher-order solver gives results similar to a 3D (Blatter–Pattyn) solver. We confirm that using a grounding line parameterization to approximate stresses in the grounding zone leads to accurate representation of ice sheet flow with a resolution of ~2 km, as opposed to ~0.5 km without the parameterization. In the MISMIP+ experimental framework, we compare different treatments of sub-shelf melting near the grounding line. In contrast to recent studies arguing that melting should not be applied in partly grounded cells, it is usually beneficial in CISM simulations to apply some melting in these cells. This suggests that the optimal treatment of melting near the grounding line can depend on ice sheet geometry, forcing, or model numerics. In both experimental frameworks, ice flowmore » is sensitive to the choice of basal friction law. To study this sensitivity, we evaluate friction laws that vary the connectivity between the basal hydrological system and the ocean near the grounding line. CISM yields accurate results in steady-state and perturbation experiments at a resolution of ~2 km (arguably 4 km) when the connectivity is low or moderate and ~1 km (arguably 2 km) when the connectivity is strong.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]
  1. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Boulder, CO (United States). Climate and Global Dynamics Lab.
  2. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC). Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC); National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI Identifier:
1833251
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-20-28324
Journal ID: ISSN 1994-0424
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001; 1852977
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
The Cryosphere (Online)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: The Cryosphere (Online); Journal Volume: 15; Journal Issue: 7; Journal ID: ISSN 1994-0424
Publisher:
Copernicus Publications, EGU
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Earth Sciences

Citation Formats

Leguy, Gunter R., Lipscomb, William H., and Asay-Davis, Xylar S. Marine ice sheet experiments with the Community Ice Sheet Model. United States: N. p., 2021. Web. doi:10.5194/tc-15-3229-2021.
Leguy, Gunter R., Lipscomb, William H., & Asay-Davis, Xylar S. Marine ice sheet experiments with the Community Ice Sheet Model. United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3229-2021
Leguy, Gunter R., Lipscomb, William H., and Asay-Davis, Xylar S. Wed . "Marine ice sheet experiments with the Community Ice Sheet Model". United States. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-3229-2021. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1833251.
@article{osti_1833251,
title = {Marine ice sheet experiments with the Community Ice Sheet Model},
author = {Leguy, Gunter R. and Lipscomb, William H. and Asay-Davis, Xylar S.},
abstractNote = {Ice sheet models differ in their numerical treatment of dynamical processes. Simulations of marine-based ice are sensitive to the choice of Stokes flow approximation and basal friction law and to the treatment of stresses and melt rates near the grounding line. We study the effects of these numerical choices on marine ice sheet dynamics in the Community Ice Sheet Model (CISM). In the framework of the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project 3d (MISMIP3d), we show that a depth-integrated, higher-order solver gives results similar to a 3D (Blatter–Pattyn) solver. We confirm that using a grounding line parameterization to approximate stresses in the grounding zone leads to accurate representation of ice sheet flow with a resolution of ~2 km, as opposed to ~0.5 km without the parameterization. In the MISMIP+ experimental framework, we compare different treatments of sub-shelf melting near the grounding line. In contrast to recent studies arguing that melting should not be applied in partly grounded cells, it is usually beneficial in CISM simulations to apply some melting in these cells. This suggests that the optimal treatment of melting near the grounding line can depend on ice sheet geometry, forcing, or model numerics. In both experimental frameworks, ice flow is sensitive to the choice of basal friction law. To study this sensitivity, we evaluate friction laws that vary the connectivity between the basal hydrological system and the ocean near the grounding line. CISM yields accurate results in steady-state and perturbation experiments at a resolution of ~2 km (arguably 4 km) when the connectivity is low or moderate and ~1 km (arguably 2 km) when the connectivity is strong.},
doi = {10.5194/tc-15-3229-2021},
journal = {The Cryosphere (Online)},
number = 7,
volume = 15,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jul 14 00:00:00 EDT 2021},
month = {Wed Jul 14 00:00:00 EDT 2021}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Large-scale ice flow over a viscous basal sediment: Theory and application to ice stream B, Antarctica
journal, April 1989

  • MacAyeal, Douglas R.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, Vol. 94, Issue B4
  • DOI: 10.1029/JB094iB04p04071

Parameterising the grounding line in flow-line ice sheet models
journal, January 2010

  • Gladstone, R. M.; Payne, A. J.; Cornford, S. L.
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 4, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-4-605-2010

A three-dimensional full Stokes model of the grounding line dynamics: effect of a pinning point beneath the ice shelf
journal, January 2012


Regularized Coulomb Friction Laws for Ice Sheet Sliding: Application to Pine Island Glacier, Antarctica
journal, May 2019

  • Joughin, Ian; Smith, Benjamin E.; Schoof, Christian G.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019GL082526

Implementation and Initial Evaluation of the Glimmer Community Ice Sheet Model in the Community Earth System Model
journal, October 2013

  • Lipscomb, William H.; Fyke, Jeremy G.; Vizcaíno, Miren
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00557.1

Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from 1979–2017
journal, January 2019

  • Rignot, Eric; Mouginot, Jérémie; Scheuchl, Bernd
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1812883116

Hydrostatic grounding line parameterization in ice sheet models
journal, January 2014


Adaptive mesh, finite volume modeling of marine ice sheets
journal, January 2013

  • Cornford, Stephen L.; Martin, Daniel F.; Graves, Daniel T.
  • Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 232, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.08.037

Correction to “Finite-element modeling of subglacial cavities and related friction law”
journal, January 2007

  • Gagliardini, O.; Cohen, D.; Råback, P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 112, Issue F4
  • DOI: 10.1029/2007JF000911

Parameterization of basal friction near grounding lines in a one-dimensional ice sheet model
journal, January 2014

  • Leguy, G. R.; Asay-Davis, X. S.; Lipscomb, W. H.
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-8-1239-2014

Assessment of sub-shelf melting parameterisations using the ocean–ice-sheet coupled model NEMO(v3.6)–Elmer/Ice(v8.3)
journal, January 2019

  • Favier, Lionel; Jourdain, Nicolas C.; Jenkins, Adrian
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-2255-2019

A parallel high-order accurate finite element nonlinear Stokes ice sheet model and benchmark experiments: A PARALLEL FEM STOKES ICE SHEET MODEL
journal, January 2012

  • Leng, Wei; Ju, Lili; Gunzburger, Max
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, Vol. 117, Issue F1
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JF001962

initMIP-Antarctica: an ice sheet model initialization experiment of ISMIP6
journal, January 2019


Assessing the ability of numerical ice sheet models to simulate grounding line migration
journal, January 2005


Adaptive mesh refinement versus subgrid friction interpolation in simulations of Antarctic ice dynamics
journal, May 2016

  • Cornford, S. L.; Martin, D. F.; Lee, V.
  • Annals of Glaciology, Vol. 57, Issue 73
  • DOI: 10.1017/aog.2016.13

Thin-Film Flows with Wall Slip: An Asymptotic Analysis of Higher Order Glacier Flow Models
journal, January 2010

  • Schoof, C.; Hindmarsh, R. C. A.
  • The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 63, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1093/qjmam/hbp025

Results of the third Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (MISMIP+)
journal, January 2020

  • Cornford, Stephen L.; Seroussi, Helene; Asay-Davis, Xylar S.
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 14, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-14-2283-2020

Pine Island glacier ice shelf melt distributed at kilometre scales
journal, January 2013


ISMIP6 Antarctica: a multi-model ensemble of the Antarctic ice sheet evolution over the 21st century
journal, January 2020

  • Seroussi, Hélène; Nowicki, Sophie; Payne, Antony J.
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 14, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-14-3033-2020

The effect of cavitation on glacier sliding
journal, March 2005

  • Schoof, Christian
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 461, Issue 2055
  • DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2004.1350

Marine ice sheet dynamics: Hysteresis and neutral equilibrium
journal, January 2009

  • Durand, G.; Gagliardini, O.; de Fleurian, B.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue F3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JF001170

Sensitivity of grounding line dynamics to the choice of the friction law
journal, October 2017

  • Brondex, Julien; Gagliardini, Olivier; Gillet-Chaulet, Fabien
  • Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 63, Issue 241
  • DOI: 10.1017/jog.2017.51

Mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet from 1992 to 2017
journal, June 2018


Albany/FELIX : a parallel, scalable and robust, finite element, first-order Stokes approximation ice sheet solver built for advanced analysis
journal, January 2015

  • Tezaur, I. K.; Perego, M.; Salinger, A. G.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 8, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-8-1197-2015

Southern Ocean Warming
journal, June 2018


A full Stokes subgrid scheme in two dimensions for simulation of grounding line migration in ice sheets using Elmer/ICE (v8.3)
journal, January 2020

  • Cheng, Gong; Lötstedt, Per; von Sydow, Lina
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-2245-2020

Greenland Ice Sheet Contribution to 21st Century Sea Level Rise as Simulated by the Coupled CESM2.1‐CISM2.1
journal, April 2020

  • Muntjewerf, Laura; Petrini, Michele; Vizcaino, Miren
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019GL086836

Ice-Shelf Melting Around Antarctica
journal, June 2013


Shallow shelf approximation as a “sliding law” in a thermomechanically coupled ice sheet model
journal, January 2009

  • Bueler, Ed; Brown, Jed
  • Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 114, Issue F3
  • DOI: 10.1029/2008JF001179

Experimental design for three interrelated marine ice sheet and ocean model intercomparison projects: MISMIP v. 3 (MISMIP +), ISOMIP v. 2 (ISOMIP +) and MISOMIP v. 1 (MISOMIP1)
journal, January 2016

  • Asay-Davis, Xylar S.; Cornford, Stephen L.; Durand, Gaël
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2471-2016

Parallel finite-element implementation for higher-order ice-sheet models
journal, January 2012

  • Perego, Mauro; Gunzburger, Max; Burkardt, John
  • Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 58, Issue 207
  • DOI: 10.3189/2012JoG11J063

Accelerated Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss Under High Greenhouse Gas Forcing as Simulated by the Coupled CESM2.1‐CISM2.1
journal, October 2020

  • Muntjewerf, Laura; Sellevold, Raymond; Vizcaino, Miren
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS002031

SHMIP The subglacial hydrology model intercomparison Project
journal, October 2018

  • De Fleurian, Basile; Werder, Mauro A.; Beyer, Sebastian
  • Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 64, Issue 248
  • DOI: 10.1017/jog.2018.78

Representation of basal melting at the grounding line in ice flow models
journal, January 2018


The Community Earth System Model: A Framework for Collaborative Research
journal, February 2013

  • Hurrell, James W.; Holland, M. M.; Gent, P. R.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00121

Marine ice sheet model performance depends on basal sliding physics and sub-shelf melting
journal, January 2017

  • Gladstone, Rupert Michael; Warner, Roland Charles; Galton-Fenzi, Benjamin Keith
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-11-319-2017

Sensitivity of Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica, to changes in ice-shelf and basal conditions: a model study
journal, January 2002


Ice-shelf buttressing and the stability of marine ice sheets
journal, January 2013


Ice sheet grounding line dynamics: Steady states, stability, and hysteresis
journal, January 2007


Brief communication: Impact of mesh resolution for MISMIP and MISMIP3d experiments using Elmer/Ice
journal, January 2016

  • Gagliardini, O.; Brondex, J.; Gillet-Chaulet, F.
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 10, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-10-307-2016

Sensitivity of centennial mass loss projections of the Amundsen basin to the friction law
journal, January 2019

  • Brondex, Julien; Gillet-Chaulet, Fabien; Gagliardini, Olivier
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 13, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-13-177-2019

Projecting Antarctica's contribution to future sea level rise from basal ice shelf melt using linear response functions of 16 ice sheet models (LARMIP-2)
journal, January 2020

  • Levermann, Anders; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Albrecht, Torsten
  • Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 11, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/esd-11-35-2020

Results of the Marine Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project, MISMIP
journal, January 2012


Century-scale simulations of the response of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet to a warming climate
journal, January 2015


Marine ice-sheet profiles and stability under Coulomb basal conditions
journal, January 2015

  • Tsai, Victor C.; Stewart, Andrew L.; Thompson, Andrew F.
  • Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 61, Issue 226
  • DOI: 10.3189/2015JoG14J221

Description and evaluation of the Community Ice Sheet Model (CISM) v2.1
journal, January 2019

  • Lipscomb, William H.; Price, Stephen F.; Hoffman, Matthew J.
  • Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-387-2019

ISMIP6-based projections of ocean-forced Antarctic Ice Sheet evolution using the Community Ice Sheet Model
journal, January 2021

  • Lipscomb, William H.; Leguy, Gunter R.; Jourdain, Nicolas C.
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 15, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-15-633-2021

Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves
journal, April 2012

  • Pritchard, H. D.; Ligtenberg, S. R. M.; Fricker, H. A.
  • Nature, Vol. 484, Issue 7395
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature10968

Dynamically coupling the non-linear Stokes equations with the shallow ice approximation in glaciology: Description and first applications of the ISCAL method
journal, March 2016

  • Ahlkrona, Josefin; Lötstedt, Per; Kirchner, Nina
  • Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 308
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.12.025

Design and results of the ice sheet model initialisation experiments initMIP-Greenland: an ISMIP6 intercomparison
journal, January 2018


Description of a hybrid ice sheet-shelf model, and application to Antarctica
journal, January 2012


Benchmark experiments for higher-order and full-Stokes ice sheet models (ISMIP–HOM)
journal, January 2008

  • Pattyn, F.; Perichon, L.; Aschwanden, A.
  • The Cryosphere, Vol. 2, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/tc-2-95-2008

Marine ice-sheet dynamics. Part 1. The case of rapid sliding
journal, February 2007


Developments in Simulating and Parameterizing Interactions Between the Southern Ocean and the Antarctic Ice Sheet
journal, October 2017

  • Asay-Davis, Xylar S.; Jourdain, Nicolas C.; Nakayama, Yoshihiro
  • Current Climate Change Reports, Vol. 3, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40641-017-0071-0

Resolution requirements for grounding-line modelling: sensitivity to basal drag and ice-shelf buttressing
journal, January 2012

  • Gladstone, Rupert M.; Payne, Antony J.; Cornford, Stephen L.
  • Annals of Glaciology, Vol. 53, Issue 60
  • DOI: 10.3189/2012AoG60A148

The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)
journal, February 2020

  • Danabasoglu, G.; Lamarque, J. ‐F.; Bacmeister, J.
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001916

Twenty-first-century warming of a large Antarctic ice-shelf cavity by a redirected coastal current
journal, May 2012

  • Hellmer, Hartmut H.; Kauker, Frank; Timmermann, Ralph
  • Nature, Vol. 485, Issue 7397
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11064

The Potsdam Parallel Ice Sheet Model (PISM-PIK) – Part 2: Dynamic equilibrium simulation of the Antarctic ice sheet
journal, January 2011


Assimilation of surface velocities acquired between 1996 and 2010 to constrain the form of the basal friction law under Pine Island Glacier: THE FRICTION LAW UNDER PIG
journal, October 2016

  • Gillet-Chaulet, F.; Durand, G.; Gagliardini, O.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016GL069937

General theory of water flow at the base of a glacier or ice sheet
journal, January 1972


A variationally derived, depth-integrated approximation to a higher-order glaciological flow model
journal, January 2011


Grounding-line migration in plan-view marine ice-sheet models: results of the ice2sea MISMIP3d intercomparison
journal, January 2013

  • Pattyn, Frank; Perichon, Laura; Durand, Gaël
  • Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 59, Issue 215
  • DOI: 10.3189/2013JoG12J129