Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography

Rudinger, Kenneth; Hogle, Craig W.; Naik, Ravi K.; Hashim, Akel; Lobser, Daniel; Santiago, David I.; Grace, Matthew D.; Nielsen, Erik; Proctor, Timothy; Seritan, Stefan; Clark, Susan M.; Blume-Kohout, Robin; Siddiqi, Irfan; Young, Kevin C.

doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040338

Title: Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography

Abstract

Crosstalk is a leading source of failure in multiqubit quantum information processors. It can arise from a wide range of disparate physical phenomena, and can introduce subtle correlations in the errors experienced by a device. Several hardware characterization protocols are able to detect the presence of crosstalk, but few provide sufficient information to distinguish various crosstalk errors from one another. In this article we describe how gate set tomography, a protocol for detailed characterization of quantum operations, can be used to identify and characterize crosstalk errors in quantum information processors. Furthermore, we demonstrate our methods on a two-qubit trapped-ion processor and a two-qubit subsystem of a superconducting transmon processor.

Authors:

Rudinger, Kenneth; Hogle, Craig W.;

; Hashim, Akel; Lobser, Daniel;

;

; Nielsen, Erik; Proctor, Timothy;

; Clark, Susan M.; Blume-Kohout, Robin; Siddiqi, Irfan; Young, Kevin C.

Publication Date:: Fri Nov 19 00:00:00 EST 2021

Research Org.:: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR)

OSTI Identifier:: 1831543

Alternate Identifier(s):: OSTI ID: 1817642

Grant/Contract Number:: NA0003525; AC02-05CH11231

Resource Type:: Published Article

Journal Name:: PRX Quantum

Additional Journal Information:: Journal Name: PRX Quantum Journal Volume: 2 Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 2691-3399

Publisher:: American Physical Society

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Subject:: 71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; Quantum tomography

Citation Formats


                    Rudinger, Kenneth, Hogle, Craig W., Naik, Ravi K., Hashim, Akel, Lobser, Daniel, Santiago, David I., Grace, Matthew D., Nielsen, Erik, Proctor, Timothy, Seritan, Stefan, Clark, Susan M., Blume-Kohout, Robin, Siddiqi, Irfan, and Young, Kevin C. Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography.  United States: N. p., 2021. 
Web.  doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040338.

Copy to clipboard


                    Rudinger, Kenneth, Hogle, Craig W., Naik, Ravi K., Hashim, Akel, Lobser, Daniel, Santiago, David I., Grace, Matthew D., Nielsen, Erik, Proctor, Timothy, Seritan, Stefan, Clark, Susan M., Blume-Kohout, Robin, Siddiqi, Irfan, & Young, Kevin C. Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography.  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040338

Copy to clipboard


                    Rudinger, Kenneth, Hogle, Craig W., Naik, Ravi K., Hashim, Akel, Lobser, Daniel, Santiago, David I., Grace, Matthew D., Nielsen, Erik, Proctor, Timothy, Seritan, Stefan, Clark, Susan M., Blume-Kohout, Robin, Siddiqi, Irfan, and Young, Kevin C. Fri .  
"Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography".  United States.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040338.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1831543,

  title        = {Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography},

  author       = {Rudinger, Kenneth and Hogle, Craig W. and Naik, Ravi K. and Hashim, Akel and Lobser, Daniel and Santiago, David I. and Grace, Matthew D. and Nielsen, Erik and Proctor, Timothy and Seritan, Stefan and Clark, Susan M. and Blume-Kohout, Robin and Siddiqi, Irfan and Young, Kevin C.},

  abstractNote = {Crosstalk is a leading source of failure in multiqubit quantum information processors. It can arise from a wide range of disparate physical phenomena, and can introduce subtle correlations in the errors experienced by a device. Several hardware characterization protocols are able to detect the presence of crosstalk, but few provide sufficient information to distinguish various crosstalk errors from one another. In this article we describe how gate set tomography, a protocol for detailed characterization of quantum operations, can be used to identify and characterize crosstalk errors in quantum information processors. Furthermore, we demonstrate our methods on a two-qubit trapped-ion processor and a two-qubit subsystem of a superconducting transmon processor.},

  doi          = {10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040338},

  journal      = {PRX Quantum},

  number       = 4,

  volume       = 2,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Fri Nov 19 00:00:00 EST 2021},

  month        = {Fri Nov 19 00:00:00 EST 2021}

}

Copy to clipboard

Journal Article:

Free Publicly Available Full Text

Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040338

Other availability

Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Works referenced in this record:

Bounding quantum gate error rate based on reported average fidelity
journal, December 2015

Sanders, Yuval R.; Wallman, Joel J.; Sanders, Barry C.
New Journal of Physics, Vol. 18, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/1/012002

Machine learning assisted readout of trapped-ion qubits
journal, August 2018

Seif, Alireza; Landsman, Kevin A.; Linke, Norbert M.
Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, Vol. 51, Issue 17
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6455/aad62b

Probing Context-Dependent Errors in Quantum Processors
journal, June 2019

Rudinger, Kenneth; Proctor, Timothy; Langharst, Dylan
Physical Review X, Vol. 9, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.021045

Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking
journal, June 2014

Kelly, J.; Barends, R.; Campbell, B.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 112, Issue 24
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.240504

Universal Quantum Gate Set Approaching Fault-Tolerant Thresholds with Superconducting Qubits
journal, August 2012

Chow, Jerry M.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Córcoles, A. D.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 109, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.060501

Broadband, Narrowband, and Passband Composite Pulses for Use in Advanced NMR Experiments
journal, August 1994

Wimperis, S.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A, Vol. 109, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1006/jmra.1994.1159

Error correction for gate operations in systems of exchange-coupled singlet-triplet qubits in double quantum dots
journal, July 2018

Buterakos, Donovan; Throckmorton, Robert E.; Das Sarma, S.
Physical Review B, Vol. 98, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035406

High-Fidelity Universal Gate Set for ${}^{9}{Be}^{+}$ Ion Qubits
journal, August 2016

Gaebler, J. P.; Tan, T. R.; Lin, Y.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 117, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060505

Detector tomography on IBM quantum computers and mitigation of an imperfect measurement
journal, November 2019

Chen, Yanzhu; Farahzad, Maziar; Yoo, Shinjae
Physical Review A, Vol. 100, Issue 5
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052315

High-Fidelity Quantum Logic Gates Using Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits
journal, August 2016

Ballance, C. J.; Harty, T. P.; Linke, N. M.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 117, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060504

What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures
journal, September 2017

Proctor, Timothy; Rudinger, Kenneth; Young, Kevin
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 119, Issue 13
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502

Performance of quantum error correction with coherent errors
journal, February 2019

Huang, Eric; Doherty, Andrew C.; Flammia, Steven
Physical Review A, Vol. 99, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.022313

Efficient $Z$ gates for quantum computing
journal, August 2017

McKay, David C.; Wood, Christopher J.; Sheldon, Sarah
Physical Review A, Vol. 96, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.022330

A trapped-ion-based quantum byte with 10−5 next-neighbour cross-talk
journal, August 2014

Piltz, C.; Sriarunothai, T.; Varón, A. F.
Nature Communications, Vol. 5, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5679

A new look at the statistical model identification
journal, December 1974

Akaike, H.
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 19, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
journal, April 2014

Barends, R.; Kelly, J.; Megrant, A.
Nature, Vol. 508, Issue 7497
DOI: 10.1038/nature13171

Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors
journal, September 2020

Sarovar, Mohan; Proctor, Timothy; Rudinger, Kenneth
Quantum, Vol. 4
DOI: 10.22331/q-2020-09-11-321

Realisation of high-fidelity nonadiabatic CZ gates with superconducting qubits
journal, October 2019

Li, Shaowei; Castellano, Anthony D.; Wang, Shiyu
npj Quantum Information, Vol. 5, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-019-0202-7

A programmable two-qubit quantum processor in silicon
journal, February 2018

Watson, T. F.; Philips, S. G. J.; Kawakami, E.
Nature, Vol. 555, Issue 7698
DOI: 10.1038/nature25766

Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes
journal, May 2011

Magesan, Easwar; Gambetta, J. M.; Emerson, Joseph
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 106, Issue 18
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.180504

Probing quantum processor performance with pyGSTi
journal, July 2020

Nielsen, Erik; Rudinger, Kenneth; Proctor, Timothy
Quantum Science and Technology, Vol. 5, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1088/2058-9565/ab8aa4

Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction
journal, December 1997

Kitaev, A. Yu
Russian Mathematical Surveys, Vol. 52, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1070/RM1997v052n06ABEH002155

Comparing Experiments to the Fault-Tolerance Threshold
journal, October 2016

Kueng, Richard; Long, David M.; Doherty, Andrew C.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 117, Issue 17
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.170502

Simple Impedance Response Formulas for the Dispersive Interaction Rates in the Effective Hamiltonians of Low Anharmonicity Superconducting Qubits
journal, March 2019

Solgun, Firat; DiVincenzo, David P.; Gambetta, Jay M.
IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 67, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1109/TMTT.2019.2893639

Characterizing large-scale quantum computers via cycle benchmarking
journal, November 2019

Erhard, Alexander; Wallman, Joel J.; Postler, Lukas
Nature Communications, Vol. 10, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13068-7

Gauge invariant information concerning quantum channels
journal, April 2018

Rudnicki, Łukasz; Puchała, Zbigniew; Zyczkowski, Karol
Quantum, Vol. 2
DOI: 10.22331/q-2018-04-11-60

High-speed low-crosstalk detection of a 171Yb+ qubit using superconducting nanowire single photon detectors
journal, August 2019

Crain, Stephen; Cahall, Clinton; Vrijsen, Geert
Communications Physics, Vol. 2, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/s42005-019-0195-8

Beat note stabilization of mode-locked lasers for quantum information processing
journal, January 2014

Islam, R.; Campbell, W. C.; Choi, T.
Optics Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 11
DOI: 10.1364/OL.39.003238

Calibration of a Cross-Resonance Two-Qubit Gate Between Directly Coupled Transmons
journal, December 2019

Patterson, A. D.; Rahamim, J.; Tsunoda, T.
Physical Review Applied, Vol. 12, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.064013

Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography
journal, February 2017

Blume-Kohout, Robin; Gamble, John King; Nielsen, Erik
Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14485

The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses
journal, March 1938

Wilks, S. S.
The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, Vol. 9, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177732360

Diabatic Gates for Frequency-Tunable Superconducting Qubits
journal, November 2019

Barends, R.; Quintana, C. M.; Petukhov, A. G.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 123, Issue 21
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.210501

Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices
journal, July 2019

Proctor, Timothy J.; Carignan-Dugas, Arnaud; Rudinger, Kenneth
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 123, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.030503

Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking
journal, December 2012

Gambetta, Jay M.; Córcoles, A. D.; Merkel, S. T.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 109, Issue 24
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.240504

Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate
journal, June 2016

Sheldon, Sarah; Magesan, Easwar; Chow, Jerry M.
Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.060302

Benchmarking Coherent Errors in Controlled-Phase Gates due to Spectator Qubits
journal, August 2020

Krinner, S.; Lazar, S.; Remm, A.
Physical Review Applied, Vol. 14, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024042

IBM Q Experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems
journal, January 2020

García-Pérez, Guillermo; Rossi, Matteo A. C.; Maniscalco, Sabrina
npj Quantum Information, Vol. 6, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-019-0235-y

Manipulation and detection of a trapped ${Yb}^{+}$ hyperfine qubit
journal, November 2007

Olmschenk, S.; Younge, K. C.; Moehring, D. L.
Physical Review A, Vol. 76, Issue 5
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.76.052314

On the freedom in representing quantum operations
journal, February 2019

Lin, Junan; Buonacorsi, Brandon; Laflamme, Raymond
New Journal of Physics, Vol. 21, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab075a

Quantum error correction for beginners
journal, June 2013

Devitt, Simon J.; Munro, William J.; Nemoto, Kae
Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 76, Issue 7
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076001

Similar Records in DOE PAGES and OSTI.GOV collections:

Characterizing Midcircuit Measurements on a Superconducting Qubit Using Gate Set Tomography

Journal Article Rudinger, Kenneth ; Ribeill, Guilhem J. ; Govia, Luke C.G. ; ... - Physical Review Applied

Measurements that occur within the internal layers of a quantum circuit—midcircuit measurements—are a useful quantum-computing primitive, most notably for quantum error correction. Midcircuit measurements have both classical and quantum outputs, so they can be subject to error modes that do not exist for measurements that terminate quantum circuits. In this work, we show how to characterize midcircuit measurements, modeled by quantum instruments, using a technique that we call quantum instrument linear gate set tomography (QILGST). We then apply this technique to characterize a dispersive measurement on a superconducting transmon qubit within a multiqubit system. By varying the delay time between the measurement pulse and subsequent gates, we explore the impact of residual cavity photon population on measurement error. QILGST can resolve different error modes and quantify the total error from a measurement; in our experiment, for delay times above 1000 ns we measure a total error rate (i.e., half diamond distance) of ϵmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevapplied.17.014014

Full Text Available
Optimization of a solid-state electron spin qubit using gate set tomography

Journal Article Dehollain, Juan P. ; Muhonen, Juha T. ; Blume-Kohout, Robin ; ... - New Journal of Physics

Here, state of the art qubit systems are reaching the gate fidelities required for scalable quantum computation architectures. Further improvements in the fidelity of quantum gates demands characterization and benchmarking protocols that are efficient, reliable and extremely accurate. Ideally, a benchmarking protocol should also provide information on how to rectify residual errors. Gate Set Tomography (GST) is one such protocol designed to give detailed characterization of as-built qubits. We implemented GST on a high-fidelity electron-spin qubit confined by a single ³¹P atom in ²⁸Si. The results reveal systematic errors that a randomized benchmarking analysis could measure but not identify, whereasmore »« less
Cited by 51
https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/10/103018
Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography

Journal Article Blume-Kohout, Robin ; Gamble, John King ; Nielsen, Erik ; ... - Nature Communications

Quantum information processors promise fast algorithms for problems inaccessible to classical computers. But since qubits are noisy and error-prone, they will depend on fault-tolerant quantum error correction (FTQEC) to compute reliably. Quantum error correction can protect against general noise if—and only if—the error in each physical qubit operation is smaller than a certain threshold. The threshold for general errors is quantified by their diamond norm. Until now, qubits have been assessed primarily by randomized benchmarking, which reports a different error rate that is not sensitive to all errors, and cannot be compared directly to diamond norm thresholds. Finally, we usemore »« less
Cited by 136
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14485

Full Text Available
Efficient, Predictive Tomography of Multi-Qubit Quantum Processors

Technical Report Blume-Kohout, Robin J. ; Nielsen, Erik ; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael ; ...

After decades of R&D, quantum computers comprising more than 2 qubits are appearing. If this progress is to continue, the research community requires a capability for precise characterization (“tomography”) of these enlarged devices, which will enable benchmarking, improvement, and finally certification as mission-ready. As world leaders in characterization -- our gate set tomography (GST) method is the current state of the art – the project team is keenly aware that every existing protocol is either (1) catastrophically inefficient for more than 2 qubits, or (2) not rich enough to predict device behavior. GST scales poorly, while the popular randomized benchmarkingmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/1733288

Full Text Available
Systematic Crosstalk Mitigation for Superconducting Qubits via Frequency-Aware Compilation

Conference Ding, Yongshan ; Gokhale, Pranav ; Lin, Sophia Fuhui ; ... - 2020 53rd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO)

One of the key challenges in current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers is to control a quantum system with high-fidelity quantum gates. There are many reasons a quantum gate can go wrong - for superconducting transmon qubits in particular, one major source of gate error is the unwanted crosstalk between neighboring qubits due to a phenomenon called frequency crowding. We motivate a systematic approach for understanding and mitigating the crosstalk noise when executing near-term quantum programs on superconducting NISQ computers. Here, we present a general software solution to alleviate frequency crowding by systematically tuning qubit frequencies according to input programs,more »« less
https://doi.org/10.1109/micro50266.2020.00028

Full Text Available

Similar Records

Title: Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography

Abstract

Citation Formats

Bounding quantum gate error rate based on reported average fidelity journal, December 2015

Machine learning assisted readout of trapped-ion qubits journal, August 2018

Probing Context-Dependent Errors in Quantum Processors journal, June 2019

Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking journal, June 2014

Universal Quantum Gate Set Approaching Fault-Tolerant Thresholds with Superconducting Qubits journal, August 2012

Broadband, Narrowband, and Passband Composite Pulses for Use in Advanced NMR Experiments journal, August 1994

Error correction for gate operations in systems of exchange-coupled singlet-triplet qubits in double quantum dots journal, July 2018

High-Fidelity Universal Gate Set for Be 9 + Ion Qubits journal, August 2016

Detector tomography on IBM quantum computers and mitigation of an imperfect measurement journal, November 2019

High-Fidelity Quantum Logic Gates Using Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits journal, August 2016

What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures journal, September 2017

Performance of quantum error correction with coherent errors journal, February 2019

Efficient Z gates for quantum computing journal, August 2017

A trapped-ion-based quantum byte with 10−5 next-neighbour cross-talk journal, August 2014

A new look at the statistical model identification journal, December 1974

Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance journal, April 2014

Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors journal, September 2020

Realisation of high-fidelity nonadiabatic CZ gates with superconducting qubits journal, October 2019

A programmable two-qubit quantum processor in silicon journal, February 2018

Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes journal, May 2011

Probing quantum processor performance with pyGSTi journal, July 2020

Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction journal, December 1997

Comparing Experiments to the Fault-Tolerance Threshold journal, October 2016

Simple Impedance Response Formulas for the Dispersive Interaction Rates in the Effective Hamiltonians of Low Anharmonicity Superconducting Qubits journal, March 2019

Characterizing large-scale quantum computers via cycle benchmarking journal, November 2019

Gauge invariant information concerning quantum channels journal, April 2018

High-speed low-crosstalk detection of a 171Yb+ qubit using superconducting nanowire single photon detectors journal, August 2019

Beat note stabilization of mode-locked lasers for quantum information processing journal, January 2014

Calibration of a Cross-Resonance Two-Qubit Gate Between Directly Coupled Transmons journal, December 2019

Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography journal, February 2017

The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses journal, March 1938

Diabatic Gates for Frequency-Tunable Superconducting Qubits journal, November 2019

Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices journal, July 2019

Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking journal, December 2012

Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate journal, June 2016

Benchmarking Coherent Errors in Controlled-Phase Gates due to Spectator Qubits journal, August 2020

IBM Q Experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems journal, January 2020

Manipulation and detection of a trapped Yb + hyperfine qubit journal, November 2007

On the freedom in representing quantum operations journal, February 2019

Quantum error correction for beginners journal, June 2013

Bounding quantum gate error rate based on reported average fidelity
journal, December 2015

Machine learning assisted readout of trapped-ion qubits
journal, August 2018

Probing Context-Dependent Errors in Quantum Processors
journal, June 2019

Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking
journal, June 2014

Universal Quantum Gate Set Approaching Fault-Tolerant Thresholds with Superconducting Qubits
journal, August 2012

Broadband, Narrowband, and Passband Composite Pulses for Use in Advanced NMR Experiments
journal, August 1994

Error correction for gate operations in systems of exchange-coupled singlet-triplet qubits in double quantum dots
journal, July 2018

High-Fidelity Universal Gate Set for ${}^{9}{Be}^{+}$ Ion Qubits
journal, August 2016

Detector tomography on IBM quantum computers and mitigation of an imperfect measurement
journal, November 2019

High-Fidelity Quantum Logic Gates Using Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits
journal, August 2016

What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures
journal, September 2017

Performance of quantum error correction with coherent errors
journal, February 2019

Efficient $Z$ gates for quantum computing
journal, August 2017

A trapped-ion-based quantum byte with 10−5 next-neighbour cross-talk
journal, August 2014

A new look at the statistical model identification
journal, December 1974

Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
journal, April 2014

Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors
journal, September 2020

Realisation of high-fidelity nonadiabatic CZ gates with superconducting qubits
journal, October 2019

A programmable two-qubit quantum processor in silicon
journal, February 2018

Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes
journal, May 2011

Probing quantum processor performance with pyGSTi
journal, July 2020

Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction
journal, December 1997

Comparing Experiments to the Fault-Tolerance Threshold
journal, October 2016

Simple Impedance Response Formulas for the Dispersive Interaction Rates in the Effective Hamiltonians of Low Anharmonicity Superconducting Qubits
journal, March 2019

Characterizing large-scale quantum computers via cycle benchmarking
journal, November 2019

Gauge invariant information concerning quantum channels
journal, April 2018

High-speed low-crosstalk detection of a 171Yb+ qubit using superconducting nanowire single photon detectors
journal, August 2019

Beat note stabilization of mode-locked lasers for quantum information processing
journal, January 2014

Calibration of a Cross-Resonance Two-Qubit Gate Between Directly Coupled Transmons
journal, December 2019

Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography
journal, February 2017

The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses
journal, March 1938

Diabatic Gates for Frequency-Tunable Superconducting Qubits
journal, November 2019

Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices
journal, July 2019

Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking
journal, December 2012

Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate
journal, June 2016

Benchmarking Coherent Errors in Controlled-Phase Gates due to Spectator Qubits
journal, August 2020

IBM Q Experience as a versatile experimental testbed for simulating open quantum systems
journal, January 2020

Manipulation and detection of a trapped ${Yb}^{+}$ hyperfine qubit
journal, November 2007

On the freedom in representing quantum operations
journal, February 2019

Quantum error correction for beginners
journal, June 2013