DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Clouds and Radiation Processes in Regional Climate Models Evaluated Using Observations Over the Ice‐free Arctic Ocean

Abstract

Abstract The presence of clouds in the Arctic regulates the surface energy budget (SEB) over the sea‐ice surface and the ice‐free ocean. Following several previous field campaigns, the cloud‐radiation relationship, including cloud vertical structure and phase, has been elucidated; however, modeling of this relationship has matured slowly. In recognition of the recent decline in the Arctic sea‐ice extent, representation of the cloud system in numerical models should consider the effects of areas covered by sea ice and ice‐free areas. Using an in situ stationary meteorological observation data set obtained over the ice‐free Arctic Ocean by the Japanese Research Vessel Mirai (September 2014), coordinated evaluation of six regional climate models (RCMs) with nine model runs was performed by focusing on clouds and the SEB. The most remarkable findings were as follows: (1) reduced occurrence of unstable stratification with low‐level cloud water in all models in comparison to the observations, (2) significant differences in cloud water representations between single‐ and double‐moment cloud schemes, (3) extensive differences in partitioning of hydrometeors including solid/liquid precipitation, and (4) pronounced lower‐tropospheric air temperature biases. These issues are considered as the main sources of SEB uncertainty over ice‐free areas of the Arctic Ocean. The results from amore » coupled RCM imply that the SEB is constrained by both the atmosphere and the ocean (and sea ice) with considerable feedback. Coordinated improvement of both stand‐alone atmospheric and coupled RCMs would promote a more comprehensive and improved understanding of the Arctic air‐ice‐sea coupled system.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]; ORCiD logo [5]; ORCiD logo [6]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [7]; ORCiD logo [7]; ORCiD logo [8];  [9];  [10]
  1. Meteorology and Glaciology Group, National Institute of Polar Research Tachikawa Japan
  2. School of Earth, Energy and Environmental Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology Kitami Japan
  3. Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research Potsdam Germany
  4. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USA, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Colorado Boulder CO USA
  5. Department of Geography University of Liége Liége Belgium
  6. Department of Environmental Meteorology University of Trier Trier Germany
  7. British Antarctic Survey, National Environmental Research Council Cambridge UK
  8. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USA
  9. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USA, Physical Sciences Division NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Boulder CO USA
  10. Met Office Exeter UK
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1755242
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1786754
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Journal Volume: 126 Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-897X
Publisher:
American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Inoue, Jun, Sato, Kazutoshi, Rinke, Annette, Cassano, John J., Fettweis, Xavier, Heinemann, Günther, Matthes, Heidrun, Orr, Andrew, Phillips, Tony, Seefeldt, Mark, Solomon, Amy, and Webster, Stuart. Clouds and Radiation Processes in Regional Climate Models Evaluated Using Observations Over the Ice‐free Arctic Ocean. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1029/2020JD033904.
Inoue, Jun, Sato, Kazutoshi, Rinke, Annette, Cassano, John J., Fettweis, Xavier, Heinemann, Günther, Matthes, Heidrun, Orr, Andrew, Phillips, Tony, Seefeldt, Mark, Solomon, Amy, & Webster, Stuart. Clouds and Radiation Processes in Regional Climate Models Evaluated Using Observations Over the Ice‐free Arctic Ocean. United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033904
Inoue, Jun, Sato, Kazutoshi, Rinke, Annette, Cassano, John J., Fettweis, Xavier, Heinemann, Günther, Matthes, Heidrun, Orr, Andrew, Phillips, Tony, Seefeldt, Mark, Solomon, Amy, and Webster, Stuart. Tue . "Clouds and Radiation Processes in Regional Climate Models Evaluated Using Observations Over the Ice‐free Arctic Ocean". United States. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033904.
@article{osti_1755242,
title = {Clouds and Radiation Processes in Regional Climate Models Evaluated Using Observations Over the Ice‐free Arctic Ocean},
author = {Inoue, Jun and Sato, Kazutoshi and Rinke, Annette and Cassano, John J. and Fettweis, Xavier and Heinemann, Günther and Matthes, Heidrun and Orr, Andrew and Phillips, Tony and Seefeldt, Mark and Solomon, Amy and Webster, Stuart},
abstractNote = {Abstract The presence of clouds in the Arctic regulates the surface energy budget (SEB) over the sea‐ice surface and the ice‐free ocean. Following several previous field campaigns, the cloud‐radiation relationship, including cloud vertical structure and phase, has been elucidated; however, modeling of this relationship has matured slowly. In recognition of the recent decline in the Arctic sea‐ice extent, representation of the cloud system in numerical models should consider the effects of areas covered by sea ice and ice‐free areas. Using an in situ stationary meteorological observation data set obtained over the ice‐free Arctic Ocean by the Japanese Research Vessel Mirai (September 2014), coordinated evaluation of six regional climate models (RCMs) with nine model runs was performed by focusing on clouds and the SEB. The most remarkable findings were as follows: (1) reduced occurrence of unstable stratification with low‐level cloud water in all models in comparison to the observations, (2) significant differences in cloud water representations between single‐ and double‐moment cloud schemes, (3) extensive differences in partitioning of hydrometeors including solid/liquid precipitation, and (4) pronounced lower‐tropospheric air temperature biases. These issues are considered as the main sources of SEB uncertainty over ice‐free areas of the Arctic Ocean. The results from a coupled RCM imply that the SEB is constrained by both the atmosphere and the ocean (and sea ice) with considerable feedback. Coordinated improvement of both stand‐alone atmospheric and coupled RCMs would promote a more comprehensive and improved understanding of the Arctic air‐ice‐sea coupled system.},
doi = {10.1029/2020JD033904},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres},
number = 1,
volume = 126,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Dec 29 00:00:00 EST 2020},
month = {Tue Dec 29 00:00:00 EST 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033904

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes
journal, September 2006

  • Hong, Song-You; Noh, Yign; Dudhia, Jimy
  • Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 134, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1175/MWR3199.1

Confronting Arctic Troposphere, Clouds, and Surface Energy Budget Representations in Regional Climate Models With Observations
journal, March 2020

  • Sedlar, Joseph; Tjernström, Michael; Rinke, Annette
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 125, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1029/2019JD031783

Condensation and Cloud Parameterization Studies with a Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model
journal, August 1989


Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes for Tropical Ocean-Global Atmosphere Coupled-Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment
journal, February 1996

  • Fairall, C. W.; Bradley, E. F.; Rogers, D. P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, Vol. 101, Issue C2
  • DOI: 10.1029/95JC03205

Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean
journal, February 2002


‘Evolution of a Storm-driven Cloudy Boundary Layer in the Arctic’
journal, November 2005

  • Inoue, Jun; Kosović, Branko; Curry, Judith A.
  • Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 117, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10546-004-6003-2

Overview of Arctic Cloud and Radiation Characteristics
journal, August 1996


Summer Arctic clouds in the ECMWF forecast model: an evaluation of cloud parametrization schemes: Summer Arctic Clouds in the IFS Model
journal, October 2015

  • Sotiropoulou, Georgia; Sedlar, Joseph; Forbes, Richard
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 142, Issue 694
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.2658

The atmospheric role in the Arctic water cycle: A review on processes, past and future changes, and their impacts: Atmospheric Role in Arctic Water Cycle
journal, March 2016

  • Vihma, Timo; Screen, James; Tjernström, Michael
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, Vol. 121, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JG003132

On the Relationship between Stratiform Low Cloud Cover and Lower-Tropospheric Stability
journal, December 2006

  • Wood, Robert; Bretherton, Christopher S.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 24
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3988.1

The ERA5 global reanalysis
journal, June 2020

  • Hersbach, Hans; Bell, Bill; Berrisford, Paul
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 146, Issue 730
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.3803

Reconstructions of the 1900–2015 Greenland ice sheet surface mass balance using the regional climate MAR model
journal, January 2017


Comparing Arctic Regional Climate Model
journal, January 2002

  • Curry, J. A.; Lynch, A. H.
  • Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 83, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1029/2002EO000051

On the Representation of High-Latitude Boundary Layer Mixed-Phase Cloud in the ECMWF Global Model
journal, September 2014


Simulation of the Mesocyclonic Activity in the Ross Sea, Antarctica
journal, July 1995


The impact of radiosonde data over the ice-free Arctic Ocean on the atmospheric circulation in the Northern Hemisphere: ARCTIC RADIOSONDES IMPROVE REANALYSES
journal, March 2013

  • Inoue, Jun; Enomoto, Takeshi; Hori, Masatake E.
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/grl.50207

Met Office Unified Model high-resolution simulations of a strong wind event in Antarctica: Simulations of a Strong Wind Event in Antarctica
journal, February 2014

  • Orr, Andrew; Phillips, Tony; Webster, Stuart
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 140, Issue 684
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.2296

PC2: A prognostic cloud fraction and condensation scheme. I: Scheme description
journal, October 2008

  • Wilson, Damian R.; Bushell, Andrew C.; Kerr-Munslow, Amanda M.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 134, Issue 637
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.333

A model-based comparison of extreme winds in the Arctic and around Greenland
journal, August 2018

  • Gutjahr, Oliver; Heinemann, Günther
  • International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 38, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1002/joc.5729

Recent Advances in Arctic Cloud and Climate Research
journal, October 2016

  • Kay, Jennifer E.; L’Ecuyer, Tristan; Chepfer, Helene
  • Current Climate Change Reports, Vol. 2, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s40641-016-0051-9

Arctic budget study of intermember variability using HIRHAM5 ensemble simulations
journal, September 2015

  • Sommerfeld, Anja; Nikiema, Oumarou; Rinke, Annette
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023153

The Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Overview, System Efforts, and Future Directions
journal, August 2017

  • Powers, Jordan G.; Klemp, Joseph B.; Skamarock, William C.
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 98, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00308.1

Arctic cloud annual cycle biases in climate models
journal, January 2019

  • Taylor, Patrick C.; Boeke, Robyn C.; Li, Ying
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 19, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-8759-2019

Unprecedented atmospheric conditions (1948–2019) drive the 2019 exceptional melting season over the Greenland ice sheet
journal, January 2020


Contributions of Clouds, Surface Albedos, and Mixed-Phase Ice Nucleation Schemes to Arctic Radiation Biases in CAM5
journal, July 2014

  • English, Jason M.; Kay, Jennifer E.; Gettelman, Andrew
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 27, Issue 13
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00608.1

Satellite-retrieved sea ice concentration uncertainty and its effect on modelling wave evolution in marginal ice zones
journal, January 2020


On the Exchange of Momentum over the Open Ocean
journal, August 2013

  • Edson, James B.; Jampana, Venkata; Weller, Robert A.
  • Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 43, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-12-0173.1

An Improved Mellor–Yamada Level-3 Model: Its Numerical Stability and Application to a Regional Prediction of Advection Fog
journal, March 2006


The impact of radiosonde data on forecasting sea‐ice distribution along the Northern Sea Route during an extremely developed cyclone
journal, January 2016

  • Ono, Jun; Inoue, Jun; Yamazaki, Akira
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 8, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000552

Evaluation of an ensemble of Arctic regional climate models: spatiotemporal fields during the SHEBA year
journal, January 2006


Impact of radiosonde observations on forecasting summertime Arctic cyclone formation: Arctic radiosondes for cyclone forecast
journal, April 2015

  • Yamazaki, Akira; Inoue, Jun; Dethloff, Klaus
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 120, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/2014JD022925

Enhanced Diapycnal Mixing due to Near-Inertial Internal Waves Propagating through an Anticyclonic Eddy in the Ice-Free Chukchi Plateau
journal, August 2016

  • Kawaguchi, Yusuke; Nishino, Shigeto; Inoue, Jun
  • Journal of Physical Oceanography, Vol. 46, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1175/JPO-D-15-0150.1

Additional Arctic observations improve weather and sea-ice forecasts for the Northern Sea Route
journal, November 2015

  • Inoue, Jun; Yamazaki, Akira; Ono, Jun
  • Scientific Reports, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/srep16868

The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system
journal, April 2011

  • Dee, D. P.; Uppala, S. M.; Simmons, A. J.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 137, Issue 656
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.828

Summertime cloud phase strongly influences surface melting on the Larsen C ice shelf, Antarctica
journal, February 2020

  • Gilbert, E.; Orr, A.; King, J. C.
  • Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Vol. 146, Issue 729
  • DOI: 10.1002/qj.3753

Impact of Arctic sea-ice retreat on the recent change in cloud-base height during autumn: RECENT CHANGE IN CLOUD-BASE HEIGHT
journal, May 2012

  • Sato, Kazutoshi; Inoue, Jun; Kodama, Yasu-Masa
  • Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 39, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1029/2012GL051850

Why are mixed-phase altocumulus clouds poorly predicted by large-scale models? Part 1. Physical processes: MIXED-PHASE CLOUDS IN NUMERICAL MODELS
journal, September 2017

  • Barrett, Andrew I.; Hogan, Robin J.; Forbes, Richard M.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, Issue 18
  • DOI: 10.1002/2016JD026321

Predictability of storm wave heights in the ice-free Beaufort Sea
journal, July 2018


Intercomparison of Arctic Regional Climate Models: Modeling Clouds and Radiation for SHEBA in May 1998
journal, September 2006

  • Inoue, Jun; Liu, Jiping; Pinto, James O.
  • Journal of Climate, Vol. 19, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3854.1

Evaluation of cloud properties from reanalyses over East Asia with a radiance-based approach
journal, January 2020