skip to main content
DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Validation of Unresolved Neutron Resonance Parameters Using a Thick-Sample Transmission Measurement

Abstract

Often discrepancies can be found in the corresponding cross sections of different evaluated nuclear data libraries. Traditional integral benchmarks that are used to validate such libraries are sensitive to cross-section values across many different energies. This means an erroneously low cross section at one energy may compensate for an erroneously high cross section at another energy, and the integral benchmark value may still be met. While the evaluated cross section may agree with that single benchmark, it could affect other systems differently. To reduce the potential for this error, an energy differential validation method is proposed herein for continuous energy Monte Carlo neutron transport models in the resolved resonance region and the unresolved resonance region (URR). The proposed method exposes the underlying physics of the URR and validates both the average cross section and resonance self-shielding effect driven by the fluctuations in that cross section. This is done by measuring the neutron transmission of a thick sample that, by its nature, exaggerates the resonance self-shielding effect. This validation method is shown to be very sensitive to the cross-section model used (resolved versus unresolved) and the fluctuation correction employed, allowing it to probe the validity of the previously mentioned cross-section evaluations.more » Tantalum-181 is used as an example to demonstrate the impact of different resonance evaluations. It was found that the JEFF-3.3 and JENDL-4.0u evaluations made reasonable choices for cross-section models of 181Ta; none of the current evaluations, however, can be used to properly model the validation transmission over all energies. It was also found that updating resonance parameters in the URR provided better agreement with the validation transmission.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [2]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., Troy, NY (United States)
  2. Naval Nuclear Lab., Schenectady, NY (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1651294
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nuclear Science and Engineering
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 194; Journal Issue: 3; Journal ID: ISSN 0029-5639
Publisher:
American Nuclear Society - Taylor & Francis
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
42 ENGINEERING

Citation Formats

Brown, Jesse M., Block, R. C., Youmans, A., Choun, H., Ney, A., Blain, E., Barry, D. P., Rapp, M. J., and Danon, Y.. Validation of Unresolved Neutron Resonance Parameters Using a Thick-Sample Transmission Measurement. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1688087.
Brown, Jesse M., Block, R. C., Youmans, A., Choun, H., Ney, A., Blain, E., Barry, D. P., Rapp, M. J., & Danon, Y.. Validation of Unresolved Neutron Resonance Parameters Using a Thick-Sample Transmission Measurement. United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1688087
Brown, Jesse M., Block, R. C., Youmans, A., Choun, H., Ney, A., Blain, E., Barry, D. P., Rapp, M. J., and Danon, Y.. Tue . "Validation of Unresolved Neutron Resonance Parameters Using a Thick-Sample Transmission Measurement". United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2019.1688087. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1651294.
@article{osti_1651294,
title = {Validation of Unresolved Neutron Resonance Parameters Using a Thick-Sample Transmission Measurement},
author = {Brown, Jesse M. and Block, R. C. and Youmans, A. and Choun, H. and Ney, A. and Blain, E. and Barry, D. P. and Rapp, M. J. and Danon, Y.},
abstractNote = {Often discrepancies can be found in the corresponding cross sections of different evaluated nuclear data libraries. Traditional integral benchmarks that are used to validate such libraries are sensitive to cross-section values across many different energies. This means an erroneously low cross section at one energy may compensate for an erroneously high cross section at another energy, and the integral benchmark value may still be met. While the evaluated cross section may agree with that single benchmark, it could affect other systems differently. To reduce the potential for this error, an energy differential validation method is proposed herein for continuous energy Monte Carlo neutron transport models in the resolved resonance region and the unresolved resonance region (URR). The proposed method exposes the underlying physics of the URR and validates both the average cross section and resonance self-shielding effect driven by the fluctuations in that cross section. This is done by measuring the neutron transmission of a thick sample that, by its nature, exaggerates the resonance self-shielding effect. This validation method is shown to be very sensitive to the cross-section model used (resolved versus unresolved) and the fluctuation correction employed, allowing it to probe the validity of the previously mentioned cross-section evaluations. Tantalum-181 is used as an example to demonstrate the impact of different resonance evaluations. It was found that the JEFF-3.3 and JENDL-4.0u evaluations made reasonable choices for cross-section models of 181Ta; none of the current evaluations, however, can be used to properly model the validation transmission over all energies. It was also found that updating resonance parameters in the URR provided better agreement with the validation transmission.},
doi = {10.1080/00295639.2019.1688087},
journal = {Nuclear Science and Engineering},
number = 3,
volume = 194,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {12}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Resistance, Emissivities and Melting Point of Tantalum
journal, April 1939


JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering
journal, January 2011

  • Shibata, Keiichi; Iwamoto, Osamu; Nakagawa, Tsuneo
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675

Initial MCNP6 Release Overview
journal, December 2012

  • Goorley, T.; James, M.; Booth, T.
  • Nuclear Technology, Vol. 180, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.13182/NT11-135

The black and white filter method for background determination in neutron time-of-flight spectrometry
journal, July 1982


Resonance Parameters of Tantalum-181 in Neutron Energy Range from 100 to 4,300eV
journal, December 1987

  • Tsubone, Izumi; Nakajima, Yutaka; Kanda, Yukinori
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 24, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1080/18811248.1987.9733533

Neutron Capture Cross Sections of Tantalum from 2.6 to 1900 keV
journal, April 1984


Neutron–nuclear data benchmark for copper and tungsten by slab assembly transmission experiments with DT neutrons
journal, November 2001


Data reduction and uncertainty propagation of time-of-flight spectra with AGS
journal, November 2012


Neutron resonances in181Ta AT 2?70 eV
journal, June 1975

  • Belanova, T. S.; Kolesov, A. G.; Poruchikov, V. A.
  • Soviet Atomic Energy, Vol. 38, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1007/BF01127449

Photoneutron target development for the RPI linear accelerator
journal, December 1999

  • Overberg, M. E.; Moretti, B. E.; Slovacek, R. E.
  • Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 438, Issue 2-3
  • DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00878-5

Neutron Total Cross Sections of 181 Ta and 238 U from 24.3 keV to 1 MeV and Average Resonance Parameters
journal, December 1984

  • Tsubone, Izumi; Nakajima, Yutaka; Furuta, Yutaka
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 88, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE84-A18374

Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes
journal, January 1906


Measurements of keV neutron capture cross sections with a 4π barium fluoride detector: Examples of Nb 93 , Rh 103 , and Ta 181
journal, October 1990


A gamma-ray detector for neutron capture cross-section measurements
journal, July 1963


Atomic weights of the elements 2011 (IUPAC Technical Report)
journal, April 2013

  • Wieser, Michael E.; Holden, Norman; Coplen, Tyler B.
  • Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 85, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1351/PAC-REP-13-03-02

Acid Corrosion Resistance of Tantalum, Columbium, Zirconium, and Titanium
journal, April 1950

  • Taylor, Donald F.
  • Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 42, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/ie50484a023

Experimental and Analytical Studies of Fast Neutron Transport in Iron
journal, March 1972

  • Malaviya, B. K.; Kaushal, N. N.; Becker, M.
  • Nuclear Science and Engineering, Vol. 47, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.13182/NSE72-A22419

Neutron Capture Cross Section Measurements of Nb-93, 1-127, Ho-165, Ta-181 and U-238 between 3.2 and 80keV
journal, August 1980

  • Yamamuro, Nobuhiro; Saito, Kimiaki; Emoto, Takashi
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 17, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1080/18811248.1980.9732628

Isotopic molybdenum total neutron cross section in the unresolved resonance region
journal, August 2015


Mixed Neutron and Gamma Spectra Measurements and Calculations in Pure Iron Benchmark Assembly with Cf-252 Neutron Source
journal, August 2002

  • Janský, Bohumil; Novák, Evžen; Turzík, Zdeněk
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Issue sup2
  • DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2002.10875278

JENDL-4.0: A New Library for Nuclear Science and Engineering
journal, January 2011

  • Shibata, Keiichi; Iwamoto, Osamu; Nakagawa, Tsuneo
  • Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Vol. 48, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.3327/jnst.48.1