DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels

Abstract

Biofuel and bioenergy systems are integral to most climate stabilization scenarios for displacement of transport sector fossil fuel use and for producing negative emissions via carbon capture and storage (CCS). However, the net greenhouse gas mitigation benefit of such pathways is controversial due to concerns around ecosystem carbon losses from land use change and foregone sequestration benefits from alternative land uses. Here, we couple bottom-up ecosystem simulation with models of cellulosic biofuel production and CCS in order to track ecosystem and supply chain carbon flows for current and future biofuel systems, with comparison to competing land-based biological mitigation schemes. Analyzing three contrasting US case study sites, we show that on land transitioning out of crops or pasture, switchgrass cultivation for cellulosic ethanol production has per-hectare mitigation potential comparable to reforestation and severalfold greater than grassland restoration. In contrast, harvesting and converting existing secondary forest at those sites incurs large initial carbon debt requiring long payback periods. We also highlight how plausible future improvements in energy crop yields and biorefining technology together with CCS would achieve mitigation potential 4 and 15 times greater than forest and grassland restoration, respectively. Finally, we show that recent estimates of induced land use change aremore » small relative to the opportunities for improving system performance that we quantify here. While climate and other ecosystem service benefits cannot be taken for granted from cellulosic biofuel deployment, our scenarios illustrate how conventional and carbon-negative biofuel systems could make a near-term, robust, and distinctive contribution to the climate challenge.« less

Authors:
ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ORCiD logo; ; ORCiD logo
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Illinois, Champaign, IL (United States). Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (CABBI); Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States); USDOE Bioenergy Research Centers (BRC) (United States). Center for Bioenergy Innovation (CBI) and Center for Advanced Bioenergy and Bioproducts Innovation (CABBI)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP); USDA; National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA); Energy Biosciences Institute; Link Foundation
OSTI Identifier:
1650388
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1735527; OSTI ID: 1798724
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725; SC0018420; AC02-06CH11357; 2014/26767-9; 2013-68005-21298; 2012-68005-19703
Resource Type:
Published Article
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America Journal Volume: 117 Journal Issue: 36; Journal ID: ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher:
National Academy of Sciences
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; biofuels; BECCS; ecosystem modeling; life cycle assessment; negative emissions

Citation Formats

Field, John L., Richard, Tom L., Smithwick, Erica A. H., Cai, Hao, Laser, Mark S., LeBauer, David S., Long, Stephen P., Paustian, Keith, Qin, Zhangcai, Sheehan, John J., Smith, Pete, Wang, Michael Q., and Lynd, Lee R. Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels. United States: N. p., 2020. Web. doi:10.1073/pnas.1920877117.
Field, John L., Richard, Tom L., Smithwick, Erica A. H., Cai, Hao, Laser, Mark S., LeBauer, David S., Long, Stephen P., Paustian, Keith, Qin, Zhangcai, Sheehan, John J., Smith, Pete, Wang, Michael Q., & Lynd, Lee R. Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels. United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920877117
Field, John L., Richard, Tom L., Smithwick, Erica A. H., Cai, Hao, Laser, Mark S., LeBauer, David S., Long, Stephen P., Paustian, Keith, Qin, Zhangcai, Sheehan, John J., Smith, Pete, Wang, Michael Q., and Lynd, Lee R. Mon . "Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels". United States. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920877117.
@article{osti_1650388,
title = {Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels},
author = {Field, John L. and Richard, Tom L. and Smithwick, Erica A. H. and Cai, Hao and Laser, Mark S. and LeBauer, David S. and Long, Stephen P. and Paustian, Keith and Qin, Zhangcai and Sheehan, John J. and Smith, Pete and Wang, Michael Q. and Lynd, Lee R.},
abstractNote = {Biofuel and bioenergy systems are integral to most climate stabilization scenarios for displacement of transport sector fossil fuel use and for producing negative emissions via carbon capture and storage (CCS). However, the net greenhouse gas mitigation benefit of such pathways is controversial due to concerns around ecosystem carbon losses from land use change and foregone sequestration benefits from alternative land uses. Here, we couple bottom-up ecosystem simulation with models of cellulosic biofuel production and CCS in order to track ecosystem and supply chain carbon flows for current and future biofuel systems, with comparison to competing land-based biological mitigation schemes. Analyzing three contrasting US case study sites, we show that on land transitioning out of crops or pasture, switchgrass cultivation for cellulosic ethanol production has per-hectare mitigation potential comparable to reforestation and severalfold greater than grassland restoration. In contrast, harvesting and converting existing secondary forest at those sites incurs large initial carbon debt requiring long payback periods. We also highlight how plausible future improvements in energy crop yields and biorefining technology together with CCS would achieve mitigation potential 4 and 15 times greater than forest and grassland restoration, respectively. Finally, we show that recent estimates of induced land use change are small relative to the opportunities for improving system performance that we quantify here. While climate and other ecosystem service benefits cannot be taken for granted from cellulosic biofuel deployment, our scenarios illustrate how conventional and carbon-negative biofuel systems could make a near-term, robust, and distinctive contribution to the climate challenge.},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.1920877117},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
number = 36,
volume = 117,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Aug 24 00:00:00 EDT 2020},
month = {Mon Aug 24 00:00:00 EDT 2020}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920877117

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Net-zero emissions energy systems
journal, June 2018


Opinion: Reconsidering bioenergy given the urgency of climate protection
journal, September 2018

  • DeCicco, John M.; Schlesinger, William H.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 39
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1814120115

Is Net Ecosystem Production Equal to Ecosystem Carbon Accumulation?
journal, January 2006


Dynamics of soil Nitrogen and Carbon Accumulation for 61 Years After Agricultural Abandonment
journal, January 2000


Unprecedented rates of land-use transformation in modelled climate change mitigation pathways
journal, May 2018


Making Fischer−Tropsch Fuels and Electricity from Coal and Biomass: Performance and Cost Analysis
journal, January 2011

  • Liu, Guangjian; Larson, Eric D.; Williams, Robert H.
  • Energy & Fuels, Vol. 25, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/ef101184e

Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission impacts of different corn ethanol plant types
journal, April 2007


Biofuels and the need for additional carbon
journal, April 2010


Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels?
journal, March 2012


North American Regional Reanalysis
journal, March 2006

  • Mesinger, Fedor; DiMego, Geoff; Kalnay, Eugenia
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Vol. 87, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-87-3-343

Interpretation of Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics in Agricultural and Afforested Soils
journal, September 2003

  • Paul, E. A.; Morris, S. J.; Six, J.
  • Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 67, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2003.1620

Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States
journal, April 2018

  • Sanchez, Daniel L.; Johnson, Nils; McCoy, Sean T.
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, Issue 19
  • DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719695115

Cellulosic ethanol: status and innovation
journal, June 2017


Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon
journal, April 2019


Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol
journal, January 2013

  • Dunn, Jennifer B.; Mueller, Steffen; Kwon, Ho-young
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-51

Recent grassland losses are concentrated around U.S. ethanol refineries
journal, March 2017

  • Wright, Christopher K.; Larson, Ben; Lark, Tyler J.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 12, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6446

Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land?
journal, November 2017


Projected mature technology scenarios for conversion of cellulosic biomass to ethanol with coproduction thermochemical fuels, power, and/or animal feed protein
journal, March 2009

  • Laser, Mark; Jin, Haiming; Jayawardhana, Kemantha
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.131

Will energy crop yields meet expectations?
journal, June 2014


Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies
journal, January 2011


The global tree restoration potential
journal, July 2019

  • Bastin, Jean-Francois; Finegold, Yelena; Garcia, Claude
  • Science, Vol. 365, Issue 6448
  • DOI: 10.1126/science.aax0848

Coproduction of ethanol and power from switchgrass
journal, March 2009

  • Laser, Mark; Jin, Haiming; Jayawardhana, Kemantha
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.133

Comparative analysis of efficiency, environmental impact, and process economics for mature biomass refining scenarios
journal, March 2009

  • Laser, Mark; Larson, Eric; Dale, Bruce
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 3, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.136

Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes
journal, June 2017

  • Robertson, G. Philip; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Barham, Bradford L.
  • Science, Vol. 356, Issue 6345
  • DOI: 10.1126/science.aal2324

Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies
journal, April 2018

  • van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Stehfest, Elke; Gernaat, David E. H. J.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 8, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0119-8

Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
journal, February 2008


The grand challenge of cellulosic biofuels
journal, October 2017


Biofuel’s carbon balance: doubts, certainties and implications
journal, September 2013


Ecosystem model parameterization and adaptation for sustainable cellulosic biofuel landscape design
journal, February 2016

  • Field, John L.; Marx, Ernie; Easter, Mark
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12316

DAYCENT and its land surface submodel: description and testing
journal, December 1998


Greenhouse Gas Mitigation on Marginal Land: A Quantitative Review of the Relative Benefits of Forest Recovery versus Biofuel Production
journal, January 2015

  • Evans, Samuel G.; Ramage, Benjamin S.; DiRocco, Tara L.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 49, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1021/es502374f

Are wood pellets a green fuel?
journal, March 2018


The potential role of forest management in Swedish scenarios towards climate neutrality by mid century
journal, January 2017


Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals
journal, January 2006


Learning through a portfolio of carbon capture and storage demonstration projects
journal, January 2016


From set-aside grassland to annual and perennial cellulosic biofuel crops: Effects of land use change on carbon balance
journal, December 2013


Serious mismatches continue between science and policy in forest bioenergy
journal, September 2019

  • Norton, Michael; Baldi, Andras; Buda, Vicas
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 11, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12643

Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Systems: Estimating the Energetic, Economic, and Climate Change Potential
journal, January 2010

  • Roberts, Kelli G.; Gloy, Brent A.; Joseph, Stephen
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/es902266r

The physics and ecology of mining carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by ecosystems
journal, January 2019

  • Baldocchi, Dennis; Penuelas, Josep
  • Global Change Biology, Vol. 25, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14559

Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
journal, February 2008


Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets
journal, August 2018


The impact of the rebound effect of the use of first generation biofuels in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions: A critical review
journal, October 2014

  • Smeets, Edward; Tabeau, Andrzej; van Berkum, Siemen
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 38
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.035

Global potential of biospheric carbon management for climate mitigation
journal, November 2014

  • Canadell, Josep G.; Schulze, E. Detlef
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6282

The need for biofuels as part of a low carbon energy future
journal, June 2015

  • Fulton, Lewis M.; Lynd, Lee R.; Körner, Alexander
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 9, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1559

Historical U.S. Cropland Areas and the Potential for Bioenergy Production on Abandoned Croplands
journal, March 2013

  • Zumkehr, A.; Campbell, J. E.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 47, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/es3033132

The potential for land sparing to offset greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture
journal, January 2016

  • Lamb, Anthony; Green, Rhys; Bateman, Ian
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 6, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2910

Challenges in Scaling Up Biofuels Infrastructure
journal, August 2010


Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest
journal, January 2013

  • Gelfand, Ilya; Sahajpal, Ritvik; Zhang, Xuesong
  • Nature, Vol. 493, Issue 7433
  • DOI: 10.1038/nature11811

Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health
journal, November 2014


Reconciling Carbon-cycle Concepts, Terminology, and Methods
journal, November 2006


Carbon debt of field-scale conservation reserve program grasslands converted to annual and perennial bioenergy crops
journal, February 2019

  • Abraha, Michael; Gelfand, Ilya; Hamilton, Stephen K.
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 14, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aafc10

Carbon balance effects of U.S. biofuel production and use
journal, August 2016

  • DeCicco, John M.; Liu, Danielle Yuqiao; Heo, Joonghyeok
  • Climatic Change, Vol. 138, Issue 3-4
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10584-016-1764-4

Monitoring US agriculture: the US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Cropland Data Layer Program
journal, August 2011


Induced Land Use Emissions due to First and Second Generation Biofuels and Uncertainty in Land Use Emission Factors
journal, January 2013

  • Taheripour, Farzad; Tyner, Wallace E.
  • Economics Research International, Vol. 2013
  • DOI: 10.1155/2013/315787

Betting on negative emissions
journal, September 2014

  • Fuss, Sabine; Canadell, Josep G.; Peters, Glen P.
  • Nature Climate Change, Vol. 4, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2392

A handful of carbon
journal, May 2007


Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California
journal, July 2018

  • Dass, Pawlok; Houlton, Benjamin Z.; Wang, Yingping
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aacb39

Enhanced soils information systems from advances in computer technology
journal, December 1993


Influence of spatially dependent, modeled soil carbon emission factors on life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn and cellulosic ethanol
journal, March 2016

  • Qin, Zhangcai; Dunn, Jennifer B.; Kwon, Hoyoung
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12333

ENVIRONMENT: Carbon Mitigation by Biofuels or by Saving and Restoring Forests?
journal, August 2007


Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy
journal, June 2012


Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited
journal, March 2016

  • Robledo-Abad, Carmenza; Althaus, Hans-Jörg; Berndes, Göran
  • GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12338

Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass
journal, December 2006