DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States

Abstract

Background: The availability of feedstock options is a key to meeting the volumetric requirement of 136.3 billion liters of renewable fuels per year beginning in 2022, as required in the US 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. Life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of sorghum-based ethanol need to be assessed for sorghum to play a role in meeting that requirement. Results: Multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways show diverse well-to-wheels (WTW) energy use and GHG emissions due to differences in energy use and fertilizer use intensity associated with sorghum growth and differences in the ethanol conversion processes. All sorghum-based ethanol pathways can achieve significant fossil energy savings. Relative to GHG emissions from conventional gasoline, grain sorghum-based ethanol can reduce WTW GHG emissions by 35% or 23%, respectively, when wet or dried distillers grains with solubles (DGS) is the co-product and fossil natural gas (FNG) is consumed as the process fuel. The reduction increased to 56% or 55%, respectively, for wet or dried DGS co-production when renewable natural gas (RNG) from anaerobic digestion of animal waste is used as the process fuel. These results do not include land-use change (LUC) GHG emissions, which we take as negligible. If LUC GHG emissions for grainmore » sorghum ethanol as estimated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are included (26 g CO2e/MJ), these reductions when wet DGS is co-produced decrease to 7% or 29% when FNG or RNG is used as the process fuel. Sweet sorghum-based ethanol can reduce GHG emissions by 71% or 72% without or with use of co-produced vinasse as farm fertilizer, respectively, in ethanol plants using only sugar juice to produce ethanol. If both sugar and cellulosic bagasse were used in the future for ethanol production, an ethanol plant with a combined heat and power (CHP) system that supplies all process energy can achieve a GHG emission reduction of 70% or 72%, respectively, without or with vinasse fertigation. Forage sorghum-based ethanol can achieve a 49% WTW GHG emission reduction when ethanol plants meet process energy demands with CHP. In the case of forage sorghum and an integrated sweet sorghum pathway, the use of a portion of feedstock to fuel CHP systems significantly reduces fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions. Conclusions: This study provides new insight into life-cycle energy use and GHG emissions of multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways in the US. Our results show that adding sorghum feedstocks to the existing options for ethanol production could help in meeting the requirements for volumes of renewable, advanced and cellulosic bioethanol production in the US required by the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard program.« less

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Energy Systmes Division. Systems Assessment Group
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1626657
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC02-06CH11357
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Biotechnology for Biofuels
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 6; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 1754-6834
Publisher:
BioMed Central
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology; Energy & Fuels; Grain sorghum; Sweet sorghum; Forage sorghum; Ethanol; Life-cycle analysis; Greenhouse gas emissions

Citation Formats

Cai, Hao, Dunn, Jennifer B., Wang, Zhichao, Han, Jeongwoo, and Wang, Michael Q. Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States. United States: N. p., 2013. Web. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-141.
Cai, Hao, Dunn, Jennifer B., Wang, Zhichao, Han, Jeongwoo, & Wang, Michael Q. Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States. United States. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-141
Cai, Hao, Dunn, Jennifer B., Wang, Zhichao, Han, Jeongwoo, and Wang, Michael Q. Tue . "Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States". United States. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-141. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1626657.
@article{osti_1626657,
title = {Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of production of bioethanol from sorghum in the United States},
author = {Cai, Hao and Dunn, Jennifer B. and Wang, Zhichao and Han, Jeongwoo and Wang, Michael Q.},
abstractNote = {Background: The availability of feedstock options is a key to meeting the volumetric requirement of 136.3 billion liters of renewable fuels per year beginning in 2022, as required in the US 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. Life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of sorghum-based ethanol need to be assessed for sorghum to play a role in meeting that requirement. Results: Multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways show diverse well-to-wheels (WTW) energy use and GHG emissions due to differences in energy use and fertilizer use intensity associated with sorghum growth and differences in the ethanol conversion processes. All sorghum-based ethanol pathways can achieve significant fossil energy savings. Relative to GHG emissions from conventional gasoline, grain sorghum-based ethanol can reduce WTW GHG emissions by 35% or 23%, respectively, when wet or dried distillers grains with solubles (DGS) is the co-product and fossil natural gas (FNG) is consumed as the process fuel. The reduction increased to 56% or 55%, respectively, for wet or dried DGS co-production when renewable natural gas (RNG) from anaerobic digestion of animal waste is used as the process fuel. These results do not include land-use change (LUC) GHG emissions, which we take as negligible. If LUC GHG emissions for grain sorghum ethanol as estimated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are included (26 g CO2e/MJ), these reductions when wet DGS is co-produced decrease to 7% or 29% when FNG or RNG is used as the process fuel. Sweet sorghum-based ethanol can reduce GHG emissions by 71% or 72% without or with use of co-produced vinasse as farm fertilizer, respectively, in ethanol plants using only sugar juice to produce ethanol. If both sugar and cellulosic bagasse were used in the future for ethanol production, an ethanol plant with a combined heat and power (CHP) system that supplies all process energy can achieve a GHG emission reduction of 70% or 72%, respectively, without or with vinasse fertigation. Forage sorghum-based ethanol can achieve a 49% WTW GHG emission reduction when ethanol plants meet process energy demands with CHP. In the case of forage sorghum and an integrated sweet sorghum pathway, the use of a portion of feedstock to fuel CHP systems significantly reduces fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions. Conclusions: This study provides new insight into life-cycle energy use and GHG emissions of multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways in the US. Our results show that adding sorghum feedstocks to the existing options for ethanol production could help in meeting the requirements for volumes of renewable, advanced and cellulosic bioethanol production in the US required by the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard program.},
doi = {10.1186/1754-6834-6-141},
journal = {Biotechnology for Biofuels},
number = 1,
volume = 6,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013},
month = {Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2013}
}

Works referenced in this record:

Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation
journal, January 2010


Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use
journal, May 2011

  • Seabra, Joaquim E. A.; Macedo, Isaias C.; Chum, Helena L.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 5, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.289

Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum and Sorghum × Sudangrass Hybrids as Feedstocks for Ethanol Production
journal, June 2008


Repeated-Batch Ethanol Production from Sweet Sorghum Juice by Saccharomyces cerevisiae Immobilized on Sweet Sorghum Stalks
journal, April 2012

  • Ariyajaroenwong, Pongthep; Laopaiboon, Pattana; Jaisil, Prasit
  • Energies, Vol. 5, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.3390/en5041215

Opportunities and roadblocks in utilizing forages and small grains for liquid fuels
journal, January 2008

  • Sarath, Gautam; Mitchell, Robert B.; Sattler, Scott E.
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Vol. 35, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10295-007-0296-3

Performance of Annual and Perennial Biofuel Crops: Nutrient Removal during the First Two Years
journal, March 2010


Probability distributions of placental morphological measurements and origins of variability of placental shapes
journal, June 2013


Cloning two P5CS genes from bioenergy sorghum and their expression profiles under abiotic stresses and MeJA treatment
journal, December 2011


Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills
journal, August 2010

  • Kim, Misook; Day, Donal F.
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Vol. 38, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0812-8

Processing of materials derived from sweet sorghum for biobased products
journal, May 2012


Performance of Annual and Perennial Biofuel Crops: Yield during the First Two Years
journal, January 2010


Optimizing Sweet Sorghum Production for Biofuel in the Southeastern USA Through Nitrogen Fertilization and Top Removal
journal, May 2011

  • Erickson, John E.; Woodard, Kenneth R.; Sollenberger, Lynn E.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-011-9129-3

Energy Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Cropland Production in the United States, 1990–2004
journal, January 2009

  • Nelson, Richard G.; Hellwinckel, Chad M.; Brandt, Craig C.
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 38, Issue 2, p. 418-425
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0262

Effect of decortication and protease treatment on the kinetics of liquefaction, saccharification, and ethanol production from sorghum
journal, June 2010

  • Alvarez, Mario M.; Pérez-Carrillo, Esther; Serna-Saldívar, Sergio O.
  • Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, Vol. 85, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2408

Energy Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Cropland Production in the United States, 1990-2004
journal, January 2008

  • Nelson, R. G.; Hellwinckel, C. H.; Brandt, C. C.
  • Journal of Environmental Quality
  • DOI: 10.3334/cdiac/tcm.011

Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: Effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations
journal, September 2009


Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol
journal, January 2013

  • Dunn, Jennifer B.; Mueller, Steffen; Kwon, Ho-young
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-51

Are we ready to cultivate sweet sorghum as a bioenergy feedstock? A review on field management practices
journal, May 2012


Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Biofuels’ Indirect Land Use Change Are Uncertain but May Be Much Greater than Previously Estimated
journal, November 2010

  • Plevin, Richard J.; Jones, Andrew D.; Torn, Margaret S.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/es101946t

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Biofuels’ Indirect Land Use Change Are Uncertain but May Be Much Greater than Previously Estimated
journal, November 2010

  • Plevin, Richard J.; Jones, Andrew D.; Torn, Margaret S.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 44, Issue 21
  • DOI: 10.1021/es101946t

Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from enzyme and yeast manufacture for corn and cellulosic ethanol production
journal, October 2012


Production, transportation and milling costs of sweet sorghum as a feedstock for centralized bioethanol production in the upper Midwest
journal, February 2009


Soil Organic Carbon Changes in Diversified Rotations of the Western Corn Belt
journal, March 2006


Farm-scale anaerobic storage and aerobic stability of high dry matter sorghum as a biomass feedstock
journal, November 2012


Ethanol yield and energy potential of stems from a spectrum of sorghum biomass types
journal, January 1988


Dryland Performance of Sweet Sorghum and Grain Crops for Biofuel in Nebraska
journal, January 2010


Energy Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Cropland Production in the United States, 1990–2004
journal, January 2009

  • Nelson, Richard G.; Hellwinckel, Chad M.; Brandt, Craig C.
  • Journal of Environment Quality, Vol. 38, Issue 2, p. 418-425
  • DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0262

Reduction of irreversibility generation in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane
journal, May 2009


Conservation Agriculture and Soil Carbon Sequestration: Between Myth and Farmer Reality
journal, April 2009

  • Govaerts∗, B.; Verhulst∗, N.; Castellanos-Navarrete, A.
  • Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, Vol. 28, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1080/07352680902776358

Land-use change and greenhouse gas emissions from corn and cellulosic ethanol
journal, January 2013

  • Dunn, Jennifer B.; Mueller, Steffen; Kwon, Ho-young
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 6, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-51

Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice in repeated-batch fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on corncob
journal, July 2011

  • Laopaiboon, Lakkana; Laopaiboon, Pattana
  • World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 28, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11274-011-0848-6

Grain sorghum is a viable feedstock for ethanol production
journal, January 2008

  • Wang, D.; Bean, S.; McLaren, J.
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Vol. 35, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0313-1

Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context
journal, October 2011


Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills
journal, August 2010

  • Kim, Misook; Day, Donal F.
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Vol. 38, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0812-8

Opportunities and roadblocks in utilizing forages and small grains for liquid fuels
journal, January 2008

  • Sarath, Gautam; Mitchell, Robert B.; Sattler, Scott E.
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Vol. 35, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10295-007-0296-3

Grain sorghum is a viable feedstock for ethanol production
journal, January 2008

  • Wang, D.; Bean, S.; McLaren, J.
  • Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Vol. 35, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10295-008-0313-1

Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use
journal, December 2012


Conservation Agriculture and Soil Carbon Sequestration: Between Myth and Farmer Reality
journal, April 2009

  • Govaerts∗, B.; Verhulst∗, N.; Castellanos-Navarrete, A.
  • Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, Vol. 28, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1080/07352680902776358

Soil Organic Carbon Changes in Diversified Rotations of the Western Corn Belt
journal, March 2006


Evaluation of Sweet Sorghum and Sorghum × Sudangrass Hybrids as Feedstocks for Ethanol Production
journal, June 2008


Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation
journal, January 2010


Performance of Annual and Perennial Biofuel Crops: Nutrient Removal during the First Two Years
journal, March 2010


Dryland Performance of Sweet Sorghum and Grain Crops for Biofuel in Nebraska
journal, January 2010


Effect of decortication and protease treatment on the kinetics of liquefaction, saccharification, and ethanol production from sorghum
journal, June 2010

  • Alvarez, Mario M.; Pérez-Carrillo, Esther; Serna-Saldívar, Sergio O.
  • Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, Vol. 85, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2408

Evaluation of Waxy Grain Sorghum for Ethanol Production
journal, November 2011


Reduction of irreversibility generation in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane
journal, May 2009


Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice in repeated-batch fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilized on corncob
journal, July 2011

  • Laopaiboon, Lakkana; Laopaiboon, Pattana
  • World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Vol. 28, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11274-011-0848-6

Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: Effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations
journal, September 2009


Optimizing Sweet Sorghum Production for Biofuel in the Southeastern USA Through Nitrogen Fertilization and Top Removal
journal, May 2011

  • Erickson, John E.; Woodard, Kenneth R.; Sollenberger, Lynn E.
  • BioEnergy Research, Vol. 5, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1007/s12155-011-9129-3

Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use
journal, May 2011

  • Seabra, Joaquim E. A.; Macedo, Isaias C.; Chum, Helena L.
  • Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 5, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1002/bbb.289

Production, transportation and milling costs of sweet sorghum as a feedstock for centralized bioethanol production in the upper Midwest
journal, February 2009


Processing of materials derived from sweet sorghum for biobased products
journal, May 2012


Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context
journal, October 2011


Works referencing / citing this record:

Brown Rot-Type Fungal Decomposition of Sorghum Bagasse: Variable Success and Mechanistic Implications
journal, January 2018

  • Presley, Gerald N.; Ndimba, Bongani K.; Schilling, Jonathan S.
  • International Journal of Microbiology, Vol. 2018
  • DOI: 10.1155/2018/4961726

A novel solid state fermentation coupled with gas stripping enhancing the sweet sorghum stalk conversion performance for bioethanol
journal, January 2014

  • Chen, Hong-Zhang; Liu, Zhi-Hua; Dai, Shu-Hua
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 7, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-53

A hole-conductor-free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability
journal, July 2014


The sorghum SWEET gene family: stem sucrose accumulation as revealed through transcriptome profiling
journal, June 2016

  • Mizuno, Hiroshi; Kasuga, Shigemitsu; Kawahigashi, Hiroyuki
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0546-6

Sweet Sorghum: An Excellent Crop for Renewable Fuels Production
book, January 2019


Strategies for near-term scale-up of cellulosic biofuel production using sorghum and crop residues in the US
journal, November 2018

  • Cui, Xinguang; Kavvada, Olga; Huntington, Tyler
  • Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 13, Issue 12
  • DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aae6e3

Brown Rot-Type Fungal Decomposition of Sorghum Bagasse: Variable Success and Mechanistic Implications
journal, January 2018

  • Presley, Gerald N.; Ndimba, Bongani K.; Schilling, Jonathan S.
  • International Journal of Microbiology, Vol. 2018
  • DOI: 10.1155/2018/4961726

The sorghum SWEET gene family: stem sucrose accumulation as revealed through transcriptome profiling
journal, June 2016

  • Mizuno, Hiroshi; Kasuga, Shigemitsu; Kawahigashi, Hiroyuki
  • Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 9, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0546-6