DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Simulation Comparisons of Particulate Emissions from Fires under Marginal and Critical Conditions

Abstract

Using a particulate emissions model developed for FIRETEC, we explore differences in particle emission profiles between high-intensity fires under critical conditions and low-intensity fires under marginal conditions. Simulations were performed in a chaparral shrubland and a coniferous pine forest representative of the southeast United States. In each case, simulations were carried out under marginal and critical fire conditions. Marginal fire conditions include high moisture levels and low winds, often desired for prescribed fires as these conditions produce a low-intensity burn with slower spread rates. Critical fire conditions include low moisture levels and high winds, which easily lead to uncontrollable wildfires which produce a high-intensity burn with faster spread rates. These simulations’ resultant particle emission profiles show critical fire conditions generate larger particle emission factors, higher total mass emissions, and a higher lofting potential of particles into the atmosphere when compared against marginal fire conditions but similar particle size distrubtions. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of the emissions model was performed to evaluate key parameters which govern particle emission factor and particle size.

Authors:
ORCiD logo [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDA; USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1597361
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-19-29898
Journal ID: ISSN 2073-4433; ATMOCZ
Grant/Contract Number:  
89233218CNA000001
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Atmosphere (Basel)
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Name: Atmosphere (Basel); Journal Volume: 10; Journal Issue: 11; Journal ID: ISSN 2073-4433
Publisher:
MDPI
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; Earth Sciences; CFD Simulation; Particulate Emissions; Soot Formation

Citation Formats

Josephson, Alexander Jon, Castano, Daniel, Holmes, Marlin Jamell, and Linn, Rodman Ray. Simulation Comparisons of Particulate Emissions from Fires under Marginal and Critical Conditions. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.3390/atmos10110704.
Josephson, Alexander Jon, Castano, Daniel, Holmes, Marlin Jamell, & Linn, Rodman Ray. Simulation Comparisons of Particulate Emissions from Fires under Marginal and Critical Conditions. United States. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110704
Josephson, Alexander Jon, Castano, Daniel, Holmes, Marlin Jamell, and Linn, Rodman Ray. Wed . "Simulation Comparisons of Particulate Emissions from Fires under Marginal and Critical Conditions". United States. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110704. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1597361.
@article{osti_1597361,
title = {Simulation Comparisons of Particulate Emissions from Fires under Marginal and Critical Conditions},
author = {Josephson, Alexander Jon and Castano, Daniel and Holmes, Marlin Jamell and Linn, Rodman Ray},
abstractNote = {Using a particulate emissions model developed for FIRETEC, we explore differences in particle emission profiles between high-intensity fires under critical conditions and low-intensity fires under marginal conditions. Simulations were performed in a chaparral shrubland and a coniferous pine forest representative of the southeast United States. In each case, simulations were carried out under marginal and critical fire conditions. Marginal fire conditions include high moisture levels and low winds, often desired for prescribed fires as these conditions produce a low-intensity burn with slower spread rates. Critical fire conditions include low moisture levels and high winds, which easily lead to uncontrollable wildfires which produce a high-intensity burn with faster spread rates. These simulations’ resultant particle emission profiles show critical fire conditions generate larger particle emission factors, higher total mass emissions, and a higher lofting potential of particles into the atmosphere when compared against marginal fire conditions but similar particle size distrubtions. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of the emissions model was performed to evaluate key parameters which govern particle emission factor and particle size.},
doi = {10.3390/atmos10110704},
journal = {Atmosphere (Basel)},
number = 11,
volume = 10,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Nov 13 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Wed Nov 13 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 3 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere
journal, December 2009


Chaparral shrub recovery after fuel reduction: a comparison of prescribed fire and mastication techniques
journal, March 2010


Speciation of Gas-Phase and Fine Particle Emissions from Burning of Foliar Fuels
journal, June 2002

  • Hays, Michael D.; Geron, Christopher D.; Linna, Kara J.
  • Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 36, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.1021/es0111683

Simulating smoke transport from wildland fires with a regional-scale air quality model: Sensitivity to spatiotemporal allocation of fire emissions
journal, September 2014


Combustion Aerosols: Factors Governing Their Size and Composition and Implications to Human Health
journal, September 2000

  • Lighty, JoAnn Slama; Veranth, John M.; Sarofim, Adel F.
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 50, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10464197

Chemical Speciation of PM 2.5 Collected during Prescribed Fires of the Coconino National Forest near Flagstaff, Arizona
journal, September 2004

  • Robinson, Marin S.; Chavez, Jesus; Velazquez, Sergio
  • Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 54, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470985

Wildland fire emissions, carbon, and climate: Emission factors
journal, April 2014


The effect of fireline intensity on woody fuel consumption in southern Australian eucalypt forest fires
journal, January 2011


Smoke Plume Trajectory Modeling
journal, August 2003


Linking local wildfire dynamics to pyroCb development
journal, January 2015

  • McRae, R. H. D.; Sharples, J. J.; Fromm, M.
  • Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 15, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.5194/nhess-15-417-2015

Modeling aerosol dynamics during forest fires
journal, February 2009


Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models
journal, January 2011

  • Akagi, S. K.; Yokelson, R. J.; Wiedinmyer, C.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011

Wildfire particulate matter in Europe during summer 2003: meso-scale modeling of smoke emissions, transport and radiative effects
journal, January 2007

  • Hodzic, A.; Madronich, S.; Bohn, B.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 7, Issue 15
  • DOI: 10.5194/acp-7-4043-2007

Note on maximum rise of fire plumes in temperature-stratified ambients
journal, January 1989


Characteristics and consequences of soot in the atmosphere
journal, January 1985


Fire spread in chaparral—'go or no-go?'
journal, January 2005

  • Weise, David R.; Zhou, Xiangyang; Sun, Lulu
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire, Vol. 14, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1071/WF04049

Modeling dispersion and deposition of smoke generated from chemical fires
journal, April 2011

  • Khajehnajafi, Shahryar; Pourdarvish, Reza; Shah, Hardik
  • Process Safety Progress, Vol. 30, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/prs.10450

Chemical Composition of Wildland Fire Emissions
book, January 2008


Pore structure of soot deposits from several combustion sources
journal, October 2000


Laboratory characterization of PM emissions from combustion of wildland biomass fuels: PARTICLE EMISSIONS FROM BIOMASS BURNING
journal, September 2013

  • Hosseini, S.; Urbanski, S. P.; Dixit, P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 17
  • DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50481

Partial penetration of an elevated inversion layer by chimney plumes
journal, January 1979


The impact of the atmosphere on the Eyjafjallajökull 2010 eruption plume: EYJAFJALLAJÖKULL ERUPTION AND ATMOSPHERE
journal, January 2012

  • Petersen, G. N.; Bjornsson, H.; Arason, P.
  • Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 117, Issue D20
  • DOI: 10.1029/2011JD016762

Studying wildfire behavior using FIRETEC
journal, January 2002

  • Linn, Rodman; Reisner, Jon; Colman, Jonah J.
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire, Vol. 11, Issue 4
  • DOI: 10.1071/WF02007

Wildfire particulate matter in Europe during summer 2003: meso-scale modeling of smoke emissions, transport and radiative effects
journal, January 2007

  • Hodzic, A.; Madronich, S.; Bohn, B.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 7, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-7-4705-2007

Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models
journal, January 2010

  • Akagi, S. K.; Yokelson, R. J.; Wiedinmyer, C.
  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, Vol. 10, Issue 11
  • DOI: 10.5194/acpd-10-27523-2010