DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Tritium Extraction from Water

Abstract

Tritiated water production is ubiquitous in facilities that handle tritium gas. Sources range from decontamination efforts, to the deliberate conversion of elemental tritium to tritiated water in processes that strive to reduce emissions to the environment, to gaseous effluents to the environment. At low concentrations, ranging from a few μCi/L to mCi/L, high throughputs are required to process the high-volume, low-activity water. Combined Electrolysis Catalytic Exchange (CECE) shows promise by offering high throughput, reliability, economic viability, and facile coupling to isotopic separation systems if necessary. This paper will discuss the features of two production-scale CECE facilities: a 7-m3/h throughput system that uses an alkaline electrolysis cell and a 21-m3/h throughput system that uses a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis cell. Finally, the former is in service and has been modified to improve reliability; the latter is in the initial stages of commissioning.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Univ. of Rochester, NY (United States). Lab. for Laser Energetics
  2. Torion Plasma Corporation, King City, ON (Canada)
  3. Nuclear Services and Sources Inc., Houston, TX (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Rochester, NY (United States). Lab. for Laser Energetics
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1574950
Grant/Contract Number:  
NA0003856
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Fusion Science and Technology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 75; Journal Issue: 8; Conference: Technology of Fusion Energy 2018, Orlando, FL (United States), 11-15 Nov 2018; Journal ID: ISSN 1536-1055
Publisher:
American Nuclear Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; water detritiation; Combine Electrolysis Catalytic Exchange; liquid phase catalytic exchange; heavy water

Citation Formats

Shmayda, W. T., Shmayda, C. R., and Torres, G. Tritium Extraction from Water. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1080/15361055.2019.1658482.
Shmayda, W. T., Shmayda, C. R., & Torres, G. Tritium Extraction from Water. United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2019.1658482
Shmayda, W. T., Shmayda, C. R., and Torres, G. Thu . "Tritium Extraction from Water". United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2019.1658482. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1574950.
@article{osti_1574950,
title = {Tritium Extraction from Water},
author = {Shmayda, W. T. and Shmayda, C. R. and Torres, G.},
abstractNote = {Tritiated water production is ubiquitous in facilities that handle tritium gas. Sources range from decontamination efforts, to the deliberate conversion of elemental tritium to tritiated water in processes that strive to reduce emissions to the environment, to gaseous effluents to the environment. At low concentrations, ranging from a few μCi/L to mCi/L, high throughputs are required to process the high-volume, low-activity water. Combined Electrolysis Catalytic Exchange (CECE) shows promise by offering high throughput, reliability, economic viability, and facile coupling to isotopic separation systems if necessary. This paper will discuss the features of two production-scale CECE facilities: a 7-m3/h throughput system that uses an alkaline electrolysis cell and a 21-m3/h throughput system that uses a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis cell. Finally, the former is in service and has been modified to improve reliability; the latter is in the initial stages of commissioning.},
doi = {10.1080/15361055.2019.1658482},
journal = {Fusion Science and Technology},
number = 8,
volume = 75,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Nov 07 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Thu Nov 07 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}

Works referenced in this record:

The CECE Experimental Industrial Plant for Reprocessing of Tritiated Water Wastes
journal, May 2002

  • Alekseev, I. A.; Bondarenko, S. D.; Fedorchenko, O. A.
  • Fusion Science and Technology, Vol. 41, Issue 3P2
  • DOI: 10.13182/FST02-A22753

Difference in HETP and HTU for Isotopic Mixtures of Protium-Tritium and Protium Deuterium in Isotopic Exchange Between Water and Hydrogen on Hydrophobic Catalyst
journal, May 2002

  • Perevezentsev, A.; Andreev, B. M.; Magomedbekov, E. P.
  • Fusion Science and Technology, Vol. 41, Issue 3P2
  • DOI: 10.13182/FST02-A22755

The deuterium isotope separation factor between hydrogen and liquid water
journal, May 1976

  • Rolston, J. H.; Den Hartog, J.; Butler, J. P.
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Vol. 80, Issue 10
  • DOI: 10.1021/j100551a008

A Comparison of Process Characteristics for the Recovery of Tritium from Heavy Water and Light Water Systems
journal, September 1988


Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model
journal, January 1991

  • Springer, T. E.
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 138, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.2085971

Investigation of Separation Performances of Various Isotope Exchange Catalysts for the Deuterium-Hydrogen System
journal, May 2002

  • Cristescu, I.; Cristescu, Ioana-R.; Tamm, U.
  • Fusion Science and Technology, Vol. 41, Issue 3P2
  • DOI: 10.13182/FST02-A22751

Deuterium exchange between hydrogen and water in a trickle bed reactor
journal, April 1978

  • Enright, J. T.; Chuang, T. T.
  • The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 56, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450560213