DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Erratum: “Nonlinear modeling of forced magnetic reconnection in slab geometry with NIMROD” [Phys. Plasmas 24, 052508 (2017)]

Journal Article · · Physics of Plasmas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5029935 · OSTI ID:1544300

The linear layer response time is evaluated inappropriately in Ref. 1. This affects analytic predictions for linear and quasilinear magnetic field penetration due to a resonant, externally applied field according to Eqs. (14) and (19) of Ref. 1, respectively. The linear layer response time for the visco-resistive regime is given according to Ref. 2 as $$τ_{VR}$$ =2.104$$τ_{shA}$$S$$^{2/3}_{sh}$$P$$^{1/6}_{m}$$, where $$τ_{shA}$$ ≡ $$τ_A$$/$$k_ya$$ is the local shear Alfvén time at the rational surface (called the local hydromagnetic time $$τ_H$$ in Ref. 2) and Ssh=$$Sk_ya$$ is the local Lundquist number. However, Ref. 1 inadvertently omits the factor of $$k_y$$a in $$τ_{shA}$$, evaluating $$τ_{VR}$$ using the Alfvén time τA based on the sheared magnetic field strength at the computation boundary. The proper evaluation of $$τ_{VR}$$ results in a linear layer response time that is ($$k_ya$$) 1/3-1/3≃0.68 shorter than that in Ref. 1. The value of the time $$τ'_{VR}$$ used to predict quasilinear equilibria according to Eq. (19) is shorter by the same factor. Using the correct value of $$τ_{VR}$$ has a direct effect on analytic predictions for the magnitude and phase of the linear penetrated field, consistent with Eq. (14) in Ref. 1. Figure 1 replaces Fig. 5 of Ref. 1, exhibiting even better agreement between NIMROD computations and analytic predictions. The highest percent difference in penetrated field magnitude is 11% and in phase is 8%.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Fusion Energy Sciences (FES) (SC-24)
Grant/Contract Number:
FG02-86ER53218; FG02-92ER54139; SC0014664
OSTI ID:
1544300
Journal Information:
Physics of Plasmas, Journal Name: Physics of Plasmas Journal Issue: 4 Vol. 25; ISSN 1070-664X
Publisher:
American Institute of Physics (AIP)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (2)

Nonlinear modeling of forced magnetic reconnection in slab geometry with NIMROD journal May 2017
Interaction of tearing modes with external structures in cylindrical geometry (plasma) journal July 1993

Cited By (1)

Mode penetration induced by transient magnetic perturbations journal August 2018

Similar Records

Parametric dependencies of resonant layer responses across linear, two-fluid, drift-MHD regimes
Journal Article · 2022 · Physics of Plasmas · OSTI ID:1878180

A new algebraic growth of nonlinear tearing mode
Journal Article · 1995 · Physics of Plasmas · OSTI ID:165476

A fast portable implementation of the Secure Hash Algorithm, III.
Technical Report · 1992 · OSTI ID:966238