DOE PAGES title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery: How Many Protein Configurations from Molecular Dynamics Simulations are Needed To Reproduce Known Ligand Binding?

Abstract

Ensemble docking in drug discovery or chemical biology uses dynamical simulations of target proteins to generate binding site conformations for docking campaigns. We demonstrate that 600 ns molecular dynamics simulations of four G-protein-coupled receptors in their membrane environments generate ensembles of protein configurations that, collectively, are selected by 70–99% of the known ligands of these proteins. Thus, the process of ligand recognition by conformational selection can be reproduced by combining molecular dynamics and docking calculations. Clustering of the molecular dynamics trajectories, however, does not necessarily identify the protein conformations that are most often selected by the ligands.

Authors:
 [1];  [2]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [4]
  1. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States); Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (United States); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  2. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  3. Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (United States); Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
  4. Univ. of Alabama, Huntsville, AL (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE; Univ. of Alabama; Univ. of Kentucky
OSTI Identifier:
1523730
Grant/Contract Number:  
AC05-00OR22725
Resource Type:
Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, Condensed Matter, Materials, Surfaces, Interfaces and Biophysical Chemistry
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: TBD; Journal Issue: TBD; Journal ID: ISSN 1520-6106
Publisher:
American Chemical Society
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Evangelista Falcon, Wilfredo, Ellingson, Sally R., Smith, Jeremy C., and Baudry, Jerome. Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery: How Many Protein Configurations from Molecular Dynamics Simulations are Needed To Reproduce Known Ligand Binding?. United States: N. p., 2019. Web. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11491.
Evangelista Falcon, Wilfredo, Ellingson, Sally R., Smith, Jeremy C., & Baudry, Jerome. Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery: How Many Protein Configurations from Molecular Dynamics Simulations are Needed To Reproduce Known Ligand Binding?. United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11491
Evangelista Falcon, Wilfredo, Ellingson, Sally R., Smith, Jeremy C., and Baudry, Jerome. Tue . "Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery: How Many Protein Configurations from Molecular Dynamics Simulations are Needed To Reproduce Known Ligand Binding?". United States. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11491. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1523730.
@article{osti_1523730,
title = {Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery: How Many Protein Configurations from Molecular Dynamics Simulations are Needed To Reproduce Known Ligand Binding?},
author = {Evangelista Falcon, Wilfredo and Ellingson, Sally R. and Smith, Jeremy C. and Baudry, Jerome},
abstractNote = {Ensemble docking in drug discovery or chemical biology uses dynamical simulations of target proteins to generate binding site conformations for docking campaigns. We demonstrate that 600 ns molecular dynamics simulations of four G-protein-coupled receptors in their membrane environments generate ensembles of protein configurations that, collectively, are selected by 70–99% of the known ligands of these proteins. Thus, the process of ligand recognition by conformational selection can be reproduced by combining molecular dynamics and docking calculations. Clustering of the molecular dynamics trajectories, however, does not necessarily identify the protein conformations that are most often selected by the ligands.},
doi = {10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b11491},
journal = {Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, Condensed Matter, Materials, Surfaces, Interfaces and Biophysical Chemistry},
number = TBD,
volume = TBD,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Jan 29 00:00:00 EST 2019},
month = {Tue Jan 29 00:00:00 EST 2019}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 42 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Efficient Drug Lead Discovery and Optimization
journal, June 2009

  • Jorgensen, William L.
  • Accounts of Chemical Research, Vol. 42, Issue 6
  • DOI: 10.1021/ar800236t

Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery
journal, May 2018


Discovery of Novel Nonactive Site Inhibitors of the Prothrombinase Enzyme Complex
journal, February 2016

  • Kapoor, Karan; McGill, Nicole; Peterson, Cynthia B.
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol. 56, Issue 3
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00596

Ensemble docking to difficult targets in early-stage drug discovery: Methodology and application to fibroblast growth factor 23
journal, November 2017

  • Velazquez, Hector A.; Riccardi, Demian; Xiao, Zhousheng
  • Chemical Biology & Drug Design, Vol. 91, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.13110

Identification and Structure–Activity Relationships of Novel Compounds that Potentiate the Activities of Antibiotics in Escherichia coli
journal, July 2017


Ensemble-based docking: From hit discovery to metabolism and toxicity predictions
journal, October 2016

  • Evangelista, Wilfredo; Weir, Rebecca L.; Ellingson, Sally R.
  • Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 24, Issue 20
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.07.064

Drug repurposing to target Ebola virus replication and virulence using structural systems pharmacology
journal, February 2016


GPCR6A Is a Molecular Target for the Natural Products Gallate and EGCG in Green Tea
journal, April 2018

  • Pi, Min; Kapoor, Karan; Ye, Ruisong
  • Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, Vol. 62, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201700770

GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers
journal, September 2015


VinaMPI: Facilitating multiple receptor high-throughput virtual docking on high-performance computers: Software News And Updates
journal, June 2013

  • Ellingson, Sally R.; Smith, Jeremy C.; Baudry, Jerome
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 34, Issue 25
  • DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23367

Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking
journal, July 2012

  • Mysinger, Michael M.; Carchia, Michael; Irwin, John. J.
  • Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 55, Issue 14
  • DOI: 10.1021/jm300687e

Ligand and Decoy Sets for Docking to G Protein-Coupled Receptors
journal, December 2011

  • Gatica, Edgar A.; Cavasotto, Claudio N.
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Vol. 52, Issue 1
  • DOI: 10.1021/ci200412p

Modeling of loops in protein structures
journal, January 2000

  • Fiser, András; Do, Richard Kinh Gian; Šali, Andrej
  • Protein Science, Vol. 9, Issue 9
  • DOI: 10.1110/ps.9.9.1753

The Distribution and Function of Phosphatidylserine in Cellular Membranes
journal, April 2010


Lipid Organization of the Plasma Membrane
journal, October 2014

  • Ingólfsson, Helgi I.; Melo, Manuel N.; van Eerden, Floris J.
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 136, Issue 41
  • DOI: 10.1021/ja507832e

The MARTINI Coarse-Grained Force Field: Extension to Proteins
journal, April 2008

  • Monticelli, Luca; Kandasamy, Senthil K.; Periole, Xavier
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Vol. 4, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/ct700324x

Computational Lipidomics with insane : A Versatile Tool for Generating Custom Membranes for Molecular Simulations
journal, April 2015

  • Wassenaar, Tsjerk A.; Ingólfsson, Helgi I.; Böckmann, Rainer A.
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Vol. 11, Issue 5
  • DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00209

Insertion and Assembly of Membrane Proteins via Simulation
journal, March 2006

  • Bond, Peter J.; Sansom, Mark S. P.
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 128, Issue 8
  • DOI: 10.1021/ja0569104

Coarse-Grained MD Simulations of Membrane Protein-Bilayer Self-Assembly
journal, April 2008


Perspective on the Martini model
journal, January 2013

  • Marrink, Siewert J.; Tieleman, D. Peter
  • Chemical Society Reviews, Vol. 42, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60093a

GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation
journal, September 1995

  • Berendsen, H. J. C.; van der Spoel, D.; van Drunen, R.
  • Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 91, Issue 1-3
  • DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E

MemProtMD: Automated Insertion of Membrane Protein Structures into Explicit Lipid Membranes
journal, July 2015


Peptide Folding: When Simulation Meets Experiment
journal, January 1999


Going Backward: A Flexible Geometric Approach to Reverse Transformation from Coarse Grained to Atomistic Models
journal, January 2014

  • Wassenaar, Tsjerk A.; Pluhackova, Kristyna; Böckmann, Rainer A.
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Vol. 10, Issue 2
  • DOI: 10.1021/ct400617g

AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility
journal, December 2009

  • Morris, Garrett M.; Huey, Ruth; Lindstrom, William
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry, Vol. 30, Issue 16
  • DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21256

Works referencing / citing this record:

Chemical‐Shift Perturbations Reflect Bile Acid Binding to Norovirus Coat Protein: Recognition Comes in Different Flavors
journal, April 2020

  • Creutznacher, Robert; Schulze, Eric; Wallmann, Georg
  • ChemBioChem, Vol. 21, Issue 7
  • DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201900572

Large-Scale Virtual Screening Against the MET Kinase Domain Identifies a New Putative Inhibitor Type
journal, February 2020